Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

CRTC to investigate Bell throttling

p2pnet news | Freedom:- Canadians will have a chance to make their feelings even more clear on Bell Canada’s continuing efforts to stifle net neutrality and block its own customers from freely using the services they’ve paid for.

More than 1,100 people have already filed complaints in support of two CAIP submissions to the CRTC demanding Bell Canada be ordered to stop its traffic throttling activities, p2pnet posted yesterday, going on:

“Yet the CRTC (Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission) has, for the moment, at least, ignored their concerns.

“Instead, it’s turned down the CAIP (Canadian Association of Internet Providers) request for interim relief against the way in which Bell Canada is routinely throttling competitor ISPs’ ADSL traffic.”

The CRTC rejected appeals by 55 small Canadian IPS, represented by CAIP (Canadian Association of Internet Providers) but says it’ll open a public consultation on internet traffic throttling, says the CBC.

“Bell has been slowing the speeds of its own subscribers who use peer-to-peer applications such as BitTorrent since November, and extended the practice to its wholesale customers in March, prompting the complaint by CAIP,” says the story.

‘Bandwidth hogs’

Bell has been unsuccessfully trying to claim P2P file sharers, whom it says represent only 5% of users, are hogging so much bandwidth they’re causing serious online congestion.

However, “According to Danny McPherson, CTO of Arbor Networks, who ‘makes all sorts of network-management and traffic-shaping tools’, used by over 70% of the ISPs around the world,” during peak-load times, 70% of subscribers use http and only 20% are using P2P, says p2pnet’s Ottawa Gal, who was the first to reveal the Bell Canada throttling scandal, going on:

Http still makes up most of the total traffic, of which 45% is traditional web content including text and images. Streaming video and audio content from services such as YouTube account for nearly 50% of the http traffic. Streaming content such as TV shows and YouTube is on the rise.”

This clearly shows the so-called bandwidth hogs, “are, in fact, ordinary, average http users during peak time, and NOT Bell’s fictitious 5% of ‘heavy” P2P users’ who suck up around 50% of the total available bandwidth,” she says.

CRTC decision ‘correct’

CAIP, meanwhile, was asking for temporary relief from the bandwidth throttling while the CRTC continued to ponder the issue, saying in its view, CAIP hadn’t shown its members would suffer irreparable harm if it wasn’t granted.

“The CRTC also said it would address the larger issue of a full probe in a letter to Bell and CAIP to be sent on Thursday,” says the CBC, going on:

“Peggy Nebout, a spokesperson for the regulator, said the letter would start a process that will allow the public to comment on the issue of traffic shaping. The CRTC expects to make a decision in the fall, she said.”

Predictably, Bell spokesman Mirko Bibic lauded the CRTC decision as the correct one.

“We look forward to dealing with the final disposition of the CAIP application in accordance with whatever process the commission sets out tomorrow,” the story has Bibic saying.

“We look forward to that because we’ll be able to get more facts on the table.”

However, Bibic’s facts to date have been considerably less than factual.

Meanwhile, the Net neutrality rally slated on May 27 will go ahead as planned.

“We expect the CRTC decision will encourage even more people to be there,” a spokesman told p2pnet.

Click here for the full CRTC report, and click here for the regularly updated p2pnet traffic throttling digest.

Meanwhile, stay tuned.

=========

UPDATE - Click here for the full CRTC probe document.

.Add to Technorati Favorites .Stumble It!

p2pnet – CRTC Bell throttling decision: full document, May 14, 2008
Ottawa Gal – Bell Canada’s ‘5% of users’ claim trashed, April 25, 2008
first to reveal – Bell Sympatico P2P Black List, November 3, 2007
Net neutrality rally – May 27 confirmed for Net Neutrality rally, May 13, 2008


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.

HOME

One Response to “CRTC to investigate Bell throttling”

  1. Paul Kambulow Says:

    Bell’s invasion, abuse of my privacy is unacceptable too.. Move to protect Canadians’ privacy on Net irritates police, attracts others especialy while Bell and CRTC have reached a cult status

    From: the paul kambulow
    Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 8:53 PM
    To: pm@pm.gc.ca ; Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca ; Day.S@parl.gc.ca ; Dion.S@parl.gc.ca ; Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca ; allenm@parl.gc.ca ; Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca ; Anders.R@parl.gc.ca ; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca ; Bell.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca ; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca ; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca ; casson@rickcasson.com ; Chong.M@parl.gc.ca ; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca ; davebatters@shaw.ca ; Davidp@parl.gc.ca ; delmad@parl.gc.ca ; DevolB@parl.gc.ca ; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Faille.M@parl.gc.ca ; Finley.D@parl.gc.ca ; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca ; Fletcher.S@parl.gc.ca ; Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca ; hawnL@parl.gc.ca ; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca ; Holland.M@parl.gc.ca ; info@dickharrismp.ca ; jaffer@parl.gc.ca ; Keeper.T@parl.gc.ca ; Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca ; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca ; Lukiwski.T@parl.gc.ca ; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; MacKenzie.D@parl.gc.ca ; martin.paul@parl.gc.ca ; mathyi@parl.gc.ca ; Mayes.C@parl.gc.ca ; Moore.J@parl.gc.ca ; Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca ; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca ; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca ; ottawa@larrymiller.ca ; Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca ; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca ; rajotte.j@parl.gc.ca ; sgroj@parl.gc.ca ; silva.m@parl.gc.ca ; simmssc@parl.gc.ca ; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca ; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca ; sorenson.k@parl.gc.ca ; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca ; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca ; volpej1@parl.gc.ca ; warkentin.c@parl.gc.ca ; Yelich.L@parl.gc.ca ; zedp@parl.gc.ca ; letters@cbc.ca ; news@ctv.ca ; newsroom@herald.ca ; newsdesk@lfpress.com ; submit@theherald.canwest.com ; letters@thegazette.canwest.com ; localnews@tc.canwest.com ; sunnewstips@png.canwest.com ; city@thejournal.canwest.com ; globalnews.reg@globaltv.ca ; mmarshall@leaderpost.canwest.com ; oped@ott.sunpub.com ; editor@tor.sunpub.com ; tabtips@png.canwest.com ; sanderson@thecitizen.canwest.com ; newsroom@canadianchristianity.com ; ministre@finances.gouv.qc.ca ; ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca ; Letters@globeandmail.com

    Subject: Move to protect Canadians’ privacy on Net irritates police, attracts others

    In Canada the bullies, even the corporate , political ones, and governmental ones too, have clearly gone overboard with suppressing our right of free speech as citizens and with invading the citizens internet privacy. I also do not feel sorry for the cops as well who are some of the biggest bullies now too, especially the RCMP. Also an executive with Bell had unacceptable shared my personal info with others on the net too, even before it next was confirmed with me. (It was posted on the Bell’s own site, customer discussion forum, by someone else, that I was going to be next removed from Bell, before I got the official Bell letter next) Bell Sympatico still is one of the biggest unacceptable privacy invaders, bullies too.

    http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/080524/national/internet_privacy

    Subject: Bell and CRTC have reached a cult status

    Cult (totalistic type): A group or movement exhibiting a great or excessive devotion or dedication to some person, idea, or thing and employing unethically manipulative techniques of persuasion and control (e.g. isolation from former friends and family, debilitation, use of special methods to heighten suggestibility and subservience, powerful group pressures, information management, suspension of individuality or critical judgment, promotion of total dependency on the group and fear of leaving it, etc.), designed to advance the goals of the group’s leaders, to the actual or possible detriment of members, their families, or the community. (West & Langone, 1986, pp. 119-120)

    and funny how that describes the past reactions of Both Bell and the CRTC to my post as well.. they also both next had banned me from their own internet sites for my posting the negative truths they do not want others to read..
    http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/bell-bce/

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®