Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
p2pnet Digests
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

Napster and the Three Musketeers

p2pnet news | Music:- “Hoping for a market with the brain dead zombie niche? It’s like Audiogalaxy coming back 10 years later with a pay service. Who’d bite?”

That’s a Reader’s Write to a p2pnet post saying the latest move by an increasingly desperate Crapster to stay afloat involves doing what the original Napster did before it was chewed up and regurgitated as a corporate music ’service’.

Sell DRM-free MP3s —- but with Apple as the front end.

Good luck.

Meanwhile, “Perry Rod thinks he has the solution,” says Peter Kafka on Silicon Alley Insider, “Put him and two of his buddies on the Napster board.”

So, who are Perry and friends? - asks the story, answering with an SEC filing “announcing their candidacy,” to wit >>>

Perry is an “independent professional investor” from Encino. He’s also president of Market Rap, which he says is developing a “collaborative community website for investors” and is chairman of something called The Paradise Project, a “non-profit religious organization”. He has “performed professionally as a musician in the Los Angeles area.” He’s 29.

Thomas Sailors manages Cloverdale Investments LLC, his personal holding company. He was an MD at Banc of America Securities and put in stints and Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch. He’s 49.

Kavan Singh owns and operates 10 Cold Stone Creamery stores. He’s 26.

The “three crusaders own 483,180 shares of NAPS,” says Kafka, adding, “about 1.1% of shares outstanding. Thomas owns almost all of the group’s holding - 401,000 shares.”

Poor guy <:(

Says the SEC filing >>>

In our view, the current Board, while impressive in experience, has not been effective in inspiring the progress we believe is required for success.”

No! Really? ;)

“Since January 2005, common stock value has fallen by approximately 85%,” the SECĀ filing notes, also stating >>>

The nominees’ intent in pursuing this effort is to focus upon our shared interest in building stockholder value. It should be emphasized that the nominees are music enthusiasts, as well as investors, who subscribe to and enjoy the Napster music subscription service. We believe that Napster can benefit greatly from the involvement of individuals with a deep interest who are willing to commit considerable time and effort at the board level in helping this company achieve its goals. Although any and all strategic options should be considered, we believe that Napster’s subscription- based business model can be successful as an independent entity if the brand is positioned properly and certain emphases within the company’s portfolio of strategic objectives receive additional attention.

Specific areas of immediate concern include, but are not limited to,

1) positioning, developing, and perhaps transforming, the Napster brand with a strategy that better explains and promotes the value proposition,

2) further development of an in-home music solution with additional AV hardware manufacturing partners,

3) capturing the attention of adult music consumers who wish to avoid piracy and could benefit from multiple family members on subscription, 4) utilizing the viral effects of social networking combined with streaming to promote the brand and the value proposition, 5) better utilization of relatively inexpensive but creative marketing opportunities available in today’s internet marketplace, and 6) cost effective outsourcing opportunities.

The nominees believe that their combined depth of interest in Napster and their willingness to act as a catalyst for changes necessary to rebuild shareholder value are what is needed at this time. Mr. Gorog was informed of our interest on March 24, 2008, and the names of these nominees were submitted for consideration by the board of directors by letter dated April 10, 2008.

We acknowledge the many challenges facing the music industry that have largely been beyond management’s control. Peer to peer piracy of copyrighted digital content, for example, is causing a dramatic shift in consumer attitudes and behavior, especially among young people, with respect to the perception of value and methods of procuring recorded music. Napster’s challenge is magnified by the dynamics of this shift. However, despite these acknowledgements, we believe much more can be done at the board level to represent shareholder interests and that the nominees are uniquely qualified for that role.

No need to stay tuned.

.Add to Technorati Favorites .Stumble It!

p2pnet - Napster looks to Apple for salvation, May 20, 2008
Silicon Alley Insider - Napster Shareholders’ Plan To Save Company: Put Themselves On The Board , May 21, 2008


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe
to p2pnet.net
| |
rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.

HOME

5 Responses to “Napster and the Three Musketeers”

  1. Andrew Wise Says:

    Why don’t the Napster folks focus on building their business around other already popular subscription-based offerings. The cable industry manages to bilk you for $100 a month, even though you only watch 20% or less of your total channels. Sirius gets you to pay for radio that you get for free in your car –

    If Napster worked on developing better hardware relationships they could really build a killer product. Imagine if Napster created a head-unit for cars, you could listen to any of the music from their catalog on-demand, right from your car. Then, when you want to load up your mp3 player, you simply “star” each song you hear on the radio, and it automatically downloads to your napster player. That’s a pretty cool value I wouldn’t mind paying for, but right now what they are doing is trying to get you to pay for something that you can already get for free, in a better format, higher quality, and from a larger selection — it’s amazing they have any subscribers at all..

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    Guilty as charged! I thought someone was telling me off but a quote! All my life I’ve been waiting for a quote. Thanks I’m fattered, er flattered. No charge for copyright, and keep the change Jon ;)

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    Hey, at least these guys are taking some initiative. Napster’s board is apparently packed with Gorog cronies or people who know nothing about the business. They just gave management 950,000 additional shares of the suffering shareholders’ stock in exchange for the outstanding performance they did over the last year. If I were a Napster shareholder I would be raising hell and firing real bullets.

  4. Jon Says:

    @ Guilty as charged!

    You’ll get my bill by snailmail ;)

    Cheers!

  5. Brian Jones (RW) Says:

    ^^ But it shifts the focus from caring and sharing to capitalistic profiteering. An ugly business. Better if they did a deal whereby they could still offer free music but make it ad funded. That’s better than nothing. I sided with them originally but no more. Not that I could ever use their app. For some reason it would never work for me, and I had to wait for Audiogalaxy (RIP).

    ^ Jon u really are a scamp aren’t u? Don’t copyright issues become ridiculous in the extreme? Love your work tho. Keep it up :)
    (it’s me reader’s write)

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
Blubster
MP3Rocket