Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
p2pnet Digests
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3Rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

IMSLP re-starts on July 1

p2pnet news | Music:- Canadian online Wiki library site IMSLP was offering sheet music mainly from dead composers until it was forced offline by Austrian company Universal Edition

Now, however, IMSLP is reporting it’ll be business as (was) usual starting July 1.

“The International Music Score Library Project was a repository of more than 15,000 musical scores that are in the public domain here in Canada,” it says, going on it had to close down, “after receiving lawsuit threats from music publishers that do not want the public domain to exist”.

“The immediate threat was from Universal Edition, a publisher in Austria,” it says, going on:

“Whereas copyright in Canada lasts until 50 years after the author’s death, copyright in Austria lasts 20 years longer. Universal Edition threatened to sue me, perhaps in Canada or perhaps in Austria, for violating Austrian law.

“There is no reason why Austrian law should apply to this site in Canada, but as a student I did not have the resources to resist even an absurd threat from a company with money to pay lawyers to attack music.”

IMSLP was launched on February 16, 2006, says the Wikipedia, continuing:

“The library consisted mainly of scans of old musical editions out of copyright. In addition, it admitted scores by contemporary composers who wished to share their music with the world by releasing it under a Creative Commons license. One of the main projects of IMSLP was the sorting and uploading of the complete works of Johann Sebastian Bach in the Bach-Gesellschaft Ausgabe (1851-1899). Besides J.S. Bach’s, Frédéric Chopin’s nearly complete oeuvre was available on IMSLP.

“Besides providing a digital repository, IMSLP offered possibilities as a musicological encyclopaedia, since multiple and historical editions of a single composition could be uploaded, and musicological analyses and historical commentaries accompany the scores.”

.Add to Technorati Favorites .Stumble It!

forced offline - Universal Edition to IMSLP …, October 23, 2007


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe
to p2pnet.net
| |
rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.

HOME

4 Responses to “IMSLP re-starts on July 1”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Ok, so licensing in Canada the public domain work of a composer wo died over 50 years ago is fraud.

    Is anyone counting the frauds or doing anything about the frauds?

    Where are the copyright cops when the criminals are big music publishers who peddle public doamin works?

    Is Mickey Mouse licensed in Canada? It is fraud, a crime.

  2. Don Kee Says:

    Dead composers. Now quietly decomposing? Pity Boathaven can’t come back to sue isn’t it? The cartels will do it FOR him. Or rather, for themselves. What gives them the right? Nothing. Did he have a contract with them? It’s ok for them to steal his work and profit by it, but to then claim copyright? That’s absurd. They can claim copyright on a derivative work only, since these excomposers are not around to defend themselves. Even if they were, the cartels would steal it from under their noses, and sue them if they chose not to contract with them.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    Don Kee Says:
    “What gives them the right? Nothing.”
    “They can claim copyright on a derivative work only,”

    Don is right. But the lawa ae wrong. Derivative works (for example, a recording of Chopin by pianist X) should also be at the outset in the public domain. The reasoning is simple: If derivative works are not in the public domain, then nothing is in de facto public domain, and pianist X (or his/her record company) owns de facto the work by Chopin.

    The idea of public domain exists because the laws limit copyright duration, but the idea is defeated by the idea that derivative works of public domain works are not themselves in the public domain.

    Who is fooling who?

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    As the owner of copyrighted works I can forbid derivative works (NC, ND) and I do so to prevent some parasites from the majors to claim copyright on my stuff.

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
TekSavvy