<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fined for posting porn on girlfriend&#8217;s page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bah</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025/comment-page-1#comment-494460</link>
		<dc:creator>bah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025#comment-494460</guid>
		<description>Rekrul, you mean and people forget that Enlightenment Sheep Mentality and return to being human because we can&#039;t maintain the debilitating pretense of what we call rationality in the face of something that calls up our true humanity from the depths of layered sophistry? Cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rekrul, you mean and people forget that Enlightenment Sheep Mentality and return to being human because we can&#8217;t maintain the debilitating pretense of what we call rationality in the face of something that calls up our true humanity from the depths of layered sophistry? Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bah</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025/comment-page-1#comment-494456</link>
		<dc:creator>bah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025#comment-494456</guid>
		<description>Jay, the court just overturned that ruling in the last month, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, the court just overturned that ruling in the last month, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rekrul</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025/comment-page-1#comment-492283</link>
		<dc:creator>Rekrul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025#comment-492283</guid>
		<description>Use the words &quot;minor&quot; and &quot;porn&quot; in the same sentence and all common sense goes out the window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use the words &#8220;minor&#8221; and &#8220;porn&#8221; in the same sentence and all common sense goes out the window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025/comment-page-1#comment-490967</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025#comment-490967</guid>
		<description>its teh kidz!  gotta protect the kidz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its teh kidz!  gotta protect the kidz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025/comment-page-1#comment-490753</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 17:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025#comment-490753</guid>
		<description>I can see how that would be defamatory or slanderous---and since the subject in question is a minor, a more serious offense----but I hardly see how they could consider it child pornography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see how that would be defamatory or slanderous&#8212;and since the subject in question is a minor, a more serious offense&#8212;-but I hardly see how they could consider it child pornography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025/comment-page-1#comment-490025</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 06:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025#comment-490025</guid>
		<description>http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080225.wgtdigitalpics0225/BNStory/Technology/home

&quot;Child pornography is illegal in the United States, but the Supreme Court in 2002 struck down on free-speech grounds a 1996 federal ban on material that &quot;appears to be&quot; a child in a sexually explicit situation. That ruling covers computer-generated images, though morphing â such as the grafting of a child&#039;s school picture onto a naked body â remains illegal.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080225.wgtdigitalpics0225/BNStory/Technology/home" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080225.wgtdigitalpics0225/BNStory/Technology/home</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Child pornography is illegal in the United States, but the Supreme Court in 2002 struck down on free-speech grounds a 1996 federal ban on material that &#8220;appears to be&#8221; a child in a sexually explicit situation. That ruling covers computer-generated images, though morphing â such as the grafting of a child&#8217;s school picture onto a naked body â remains illegal.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025/comment-page-1#comment-489994</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 06:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025#comment-489994</guid>
		<description>But if the subject&#039;s face is the only thing that is shown.  And the nude part is that of an adult?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if the subject&#8217;s face is the only thing that is shown.  And the nude part is that of an adult?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025/comment-page-1#comment-489788</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 03:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025#comment-489788</guid>
		<description>If the subjects underage, then yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the subjects underage, then yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025/comment-page-1#comment-489770</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025#comment-489770</guid>
		<description>How would living in the US make him a sex offender?  Is it illegal to photoshop a pic of someone?  I mean Ive seen photos of people faces on the bodies of naked people.  Is putting a underage face on an adult nude picture illegal??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would living in the US make him a sex offender?  Is it illegal to photoshop a pic of someone?  I mean Ive seen photos of people faces on the bodies of naked people.  Is putting a underage face on an adult nude picture illegal??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025/comment-page-1#comment-489462</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16025#comment-489462</guid>
		<description>In the united states, he would have been a sex offender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the united states, he would have been a sex offender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


