Comments on: Charlie Angus Net Neutrality bill http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16065 p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:45:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: torrent lover http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16065#comment-500809 torrent lover Sat, 31 May 2008 01:46:09 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16065#comment-500809 Too many wiggle words, not enough punch. You can bet they'll argue that blocking P2P traffic is done in accordance with clause 2a. The bill practically gives the ISPs permission to screw with us. Too many wiggle words, not enough punch.

You can bet they’ll argue that blocking P2P traffic is done in accordance with clause 2a.

The bill practically gives the ISPs permission to screw with us.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16065#comment-497655 Reader's Write Thu, 29 May 2008 14:33:32 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16065#comment-497655 Sorry no good they'll cop out blocking/degrading any traffic they don't want as "managing" just like comcasts statements. They could even use (3) to dissalow computers running traffic hungry apps as they "substantially degrade the use of the network by other subscribers." I'd also be interested how/if VOIP will be affected as the anti-neutrality side claims these apps need proiretized packets for best usage Sorry no good they’ll cop out blocking/degrading any traffic they don’t want as “managing” just like comcasts statements. They could even use (3) to dissalow computers running traffic hungry apps as they “substantially degrade the use of the network by other subscribers.”

I’d also be interested how/if VOIP will be affected as the anti-neutrality side claims these apps need proiretized packets for best usage

]]>