<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reuters RIAA infatuation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alter_Fritz</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/comment-page-1#comment-518907</link>
		<dc:creator>Alter_Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116#comment-518907</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hashes can be easily changed.&quot;

Yes of course. but that is not the point this time: 
The point is the opposite that RIAA (so far only in front of &quot;the press and the court of public oppinion&quot; but not perjuring like in front of judges) claim that if they find files with the SAME hash, that that is &quot;proof&quot; that one of the instances must be illegaly downloaded by the guy where that identical hash showed up.
As pointed out that argument is a blatantly lie since the source material (the &quot;perfect digital copies&quot; produced by the RIAA members themself) is exactly that 100&amp; identical for each pressed dics where the same glass master in the plastic molding machine is used.

back in the 90&#039;s me visited as a class project one of those factories that produce those legitimate companies for &quot;pressed&quot; disks, And the guy that showed us the factory explained in detail how this process of creating industrial style &quot;pressed&quot; MAFIAA-disks is tailored to the fact that every disk is identical to the first master.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hashes can be easily changed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes of course. but that is not the point this time:<br />
The point is the opposite that RIAA (so far only in front of &#8220;the press and the court of public oppinion&#8221; but not perjuring like in front of judges) claim that if they find files with the SAME hash, that that is &#8220;proof&#8221; that one of the instances must be illegaly downloaded by the guy where that identical hash showed up.<br />
As pointed out that argument is a blatantly lie since the source material (the &#8220;perfect digital copies&#8221; produced by the RIAA members themself) is exactly that 100&amp; identical for each pressed dics where the same glass master in the plastic molding machine is used.</p>
<p>back in the 90&#8217;s me visited as a class project one of those factories that produce those legitimate companies for &#8220;pressed&#8221; disks, And the guy that showed us the factory explained in detail how this process of creating industrial style &#8220;pressed&#8221; MAFIAA-disks is tailored to the fact that every disk is identical to the first master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/comment-page-1#comment-518489</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116#comment-518489</guid>
		<description>Hashes can be easily changed. Make the track slightly longer with a blank space, the data a bit bigger with an image included, and the hash they look for is no longer there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hashes can be easily changed. Make the track slightly longer with a blank space, the data a bit bigger with an image included, and the hash they look for is no longer there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidwillisw</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/comment-page-1#comment-518097</link>
		<dc:creator>davidwillisw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116#comment-518097</guid>
		<description>you know what i just don&#039;t understand,and i be as quilty as all others is why we let the record companies and movie studios run the government!?? i mean we are untold numbers out here and we still let them call all the shots!! i tried sometime ago to gather a group together and i mean a real group that would combine the people,the law and nothing happened!! this should have been stopped in it&#039;s tracks the first time lars whats his twit from the heavy metal wanna bes started his first law suite! ah well may be some one will deceide to try again.i&#039;ll help if i canmaybe if it&#039;s serious.we here in my beloved Canada are now facing the threat by the us puppet government we have in power now! we got&#039;s to try to fight the good fight peoples,there are cracks starting to apear,we just have to widen them!! 
                                                                         be well all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know what i just don&#8217;t understand,and i be as quilty as all others is why we let the record companies and movie studios run the government!?? i mean we are untold numbers out here and we still let them call all the shots!! i tried sometime ago to gather a group together and i mean a real group that would combine the people,the law and nothing happened!! this should have been stopped in it&#8217;s tracks the first time lars whats his twit from the heavy metal wanna bes started his first law suite! ah well may be some one will deceide to try again.i&#8217;ll help if i canmaybe if it&#8217;s serious.we here in my beloved Canada are now facing the threat by the us puppet government we have in power now! we got&#8217;s to try to fight the good fight peoples,there are cracks starting to apear,we just have to widen them!!<br />
                                                                         be well all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alter_Fritz</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/comment-page-1#comment-518093</link>
		<dc:creator>Alter_Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116#comment-518093</guid>
		<description>the story isn&#039;t by reuters originally, but by Billboard.

Last time I checked BB isn&#039;t exactly known for its &quot;wikipedia like&quot; NPOV when it comes to reporting in their field of business which is (mostly) Evil4 music.

Those RIAA bastard do not even have scruples to blatantly lie to them/the press!

Give me a break!!
When was the last time that a name change of a file will alter its (CRC) hashvalue?

If that would be true, then would be dupefilefinders be useless. 
And I can declare under penalty of perjury based on personal knowledge (not just thru the grapevine, but by personal viewing of it) that those dupefinders are not functionless just because one rip of a CD has another name.

And the argument that every rip is a bit different is nonsense also. Unless some busy MAFIAA monkeys handcraft every single CD that is for sale seperately with slightly different digital songdata, there are thousands of CDs out there that produce EXACTLY the same resulting files no matter what Operating system or what software used to read those &quot;perfect digital copies&quot; of the CDs, As long as the software used to read the digital data makes sure it really just writes EXACTLY the same bitinformation to the HDD as it is found on the CDs then EVERY copy out there will hash the same way and yet 2 particular songs could be ripped by 2 different persons on 2 different countries, if they used the same exactsource CD data and used the same mp3 encoder with the exact same settings the results will be 100% identical even though the used both their own purchased CD for exercising the fair use of transcoding their CDs themself!

But what should we expect? 
&quot;RIAA-still national lead counsel but soon to be judge himself (man would I feel ashamed if I were a honorable judge in that court where a vulture like gabriel is appointed to that me would get such a bad apple as collegue!)-Richard&quot; spouted that lie already in one of the interviews after the sua sponte remark of the thomas case judge!

Me mentioned that new tactic by RIAA already here

http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2008/05/judge-in-capitol-v-thomas-says.html?showComment=1210953780000#c267086126627253024</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the story isn&#8217;t by reuters originally, but by Billboard.</p>
<p>Last time I checked BB isn&#8217;t exactly known for its &#8220;wikipedia like&#8221; NPOV when it comes to reporting in their field of business which is (mostly) Evil4 music.</p>
<p>Those RIAA bastard do not even have scruples to blatantly lie to them/the press!</p>
<p>Give me a break!!<br />
When was the last time that a name change of a file will alter its (CRC) hashvalue?</p>
<p>If that would be true, then would be dupefilefinders be useless.<br />
And I can declare under penalty of perjury based on personal knowledge (not just thru the grapevine, but by personal viewing of it) that those dupefinders are not functionless just because one rip of a CD has another name.</p>
<p>And the argument that every rip is a bit different is nonsense also. Unless some busy MAFIAA monkeys handcraft every single CD that is for sale seperately with slightly different digital songdata, there are thousands of CDs out there that produce EXACTLY the same resulting files no matter what Operating system or what software used to read those &#8220;perfect digital copies&#8221; of the CDs, As long as the software used to read the digital data makes sure it really just writes EXACTLY the same bitinformation to the HDD as it is found on the CDs then EVERY copy out there will hash the same way and yet 2 particular songs could be ripped by 2 different persons on 2 different countries, if they used the same exactsource CD data and used the same mp3 encoder with the exact same settings the results will be 100% identical even though the used both their own purchased CD for exercising the fair use of transcoding their CDs themself!</p>
<p>But what should we expect?<br />
&#8220;RIAA-still national lead counsel but soon to be judge himself (man would I feel ashamed if I were a honorable judge in that court where a vulture like gabriel is appointed to that me would get such a bad apple as collegue!)-Richard&#8221; spouted that lie already in one of the interviews after the sua sponte remark of the thomas case judge!</p>
<p>Me mentioned that new tactic by RIAA already here</p>
<p><a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2008/05/judge-in-capitol-v-thomas-says.html?showComment=1210953780000#c267086126627253024" rel="nofollow">http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2008/05/judge-in-capitol-v-thomas-says.html?showComment=1210953780000#c267086126627253024</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/comment-page-1#comment-517919</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116#comment-517919</guid>
		<description>&quot;Reuters is supposed to be a reliable, impartial news service presenting carefully balanced reports, not what look like spin pieces from hard-core commercial companies&quot;

Who care about Reuter and it&#039;s rats! 

The RIAA probably spent a fortune corrupting somebody at Reuter not knowing that Reuter is irrelevant since most people get their news from internet theses days.

Talk about a bunch of obsolete fogies infesting the major entertainement companies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Reuters is supposed to be a reliable, impartial news service presenting carefully balanced reports, not what look like spin pieces from hard-core commercial companies&#8221;</p>
<p>Who care about Reuter and it&#8217;s rats! </p>
<p>The RIAA probably spent a fortune corrupting somebody at Reuter not knowing that Reuter is irrelevant since most people get their news from internet theses days.</p>
<p>Talk about a bunch of obsolete fogies infesting the major entertainement companies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/comment-page-1#comment-517760</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116#comment-517760</guid>
		<description>&quot; Its time to change the legal system and return it to the people. &quot;

 True, but only to a point.

 Lynchings, Witch hunts ( yes, yhose witch hunts ) McCarthyism, etc ... are what happens
 when &#039;Justice&#039; is in the &#039;Peoples&#039; hands. It&#039;s balance that is needed, but does not exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Its time to change the legal system and return it to the people. &#8221;</p>
<p> True, but only to a point.</p>
<p> Lynchings, Witch hunts ( yes, yhose witch hunts ) McCarthyism, etc &#8230; are what happens<br />
 when &#8216;Justice&#8217; is in the &#8216;Peoples&#8217; hands. It&#8217;s balance that is needed, but does not exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinker</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/comment-page-1#comment-517508</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116#comment-517508</guid>
		<description>&quot;a judge has admitted he made a âmanifest error of lawâ in ruling Jammie Thomas was guilty of copyright infringement&quot;

In a normal business, if an executive commits a blunder similar in magnitude that executive would be forced to quit (the preferred method of firing executives).  But judges are exempt of being fired after major blunders, even after sending an inocent person to jail or after deciding cases in favor of lawyer friends, which are all over the palce for picking like plums by the parties in a lawsuit. Its time to change the legal system and return it to the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a judge has admitted he made a âmanifest error of lawâ in ruling Jammie Thomas was guilty of copyright infringement&#8221;</p>
<p>In a normal business, if an executive commits a blunder similar in magnitude that executive would be forced to quit (the preferred method of firing executives).  But judges are exempt of being fired after major blunders, even after sending an inocent person to jail or after deciding cases in favor of lawyer friends, which are all over the palce for picking like plums by the parties in a lawsuit. Its time to change the legal system and return it to the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/comment-page-1#comment-517125</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116#comment-517125</guid>
		<description>Hey, are you really an RIAA rep? Coz you sound like you hate yourself, and they don&#039;t. BTW I think the days of music idol worship are gone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, are you really an RIAA rep? Coz you sound like you hate yourself, and they don&#8217;t. BTW I think the days of music idol worship are gone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/comment-page-1#comment-516517</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116#comment-516517</guid>
		<description>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15000

And here in the comment are those who are higher up the ladder, and do not protect their identities at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15000" rel="nofollow">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15000</a></p>
<p>And here in the comment are those who are higher up the ladder, and do not protect their identities at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/comment-page-1#comment-516362</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116#comment-516362</guid>
		<description>On ACTA better yet &gt; http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16053 and http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16050</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On ACTA better yet &gt; <a href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16053" rel="nofollow">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16053</a> and <a href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16050" rel="nofollow">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16050</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIAA rrepp</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116/comment-page-1#comment-516273</link>
		<dc:creator>RIAA rrepp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16116#comment-516273</guid>
		<description>Yup, weâve got so much power, that even when weâre blatantly caught out, we continue right on pulling the strings of our sock puppet media. hahahhahahha!!!! And you thought that Reuters was âneutralâ? Grow up.

Just you wait and see, us and the rest of Big Media whoâs âstarsâ you morons worship will have the law and infrastructure worldwide rigged so that you as much as *look* at a digital file the wrong way and weâve got you! DRM dead? Donât you believe it. Itâs just hibernatingâ¦

And if you think this shit isnât already happening to you, just remember ACTA: http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080603/1247531301.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, weâve got so much power, that even when weâre blatantly caught out, we continue right on pulling the strings of our sock puppet media. hahahhahahha!!!! And you thought that Reuters was âneutralâ? Grow up.</p>
<p>Just you wait and see, us and the rest of Big Media whoâs âstarsâ you morons worship will have the law and infrastructure worldwide rigged so that you as much as *look* at a digital file the wrong way and weâve got you! DRM dead? Donât you believe it. Itâs just hibernatingâ¦</p>
<p>And if you think this shit isnât already happening to you, just remember ACTA: <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080603/1247531301.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080603/1247531301.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


