Comments on: RIAA caves in over Lindor case http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16140 p2pnet.net - reader powered Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:59:30 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Nuihc http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16140/comment-page-1#comment-534833 Nuihc Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:11:46 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16140#comment-534833 Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791 This only applies to the government. It doesn't apply in civil litigation. Amendment 4 – Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791

This only applies to the government. It doesn’t apply in civil litigation.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16140/comment-page-1#comment-533774 Reader's Write Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:14:54 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16140#comment-533774 After reading the latest "letter" from the RIAA, I have a question on admissable evidence in a court of law. As I understand the law, I am not a lawyer, if you serve a search warrent, you must list specificaly what you are searching for, and other items found that are not in plain site are not admissible in court. The current letter, dated June 17th, states that a resume found on the Lindor computer had a resume on it for someone else. Does this not PROVE that the RIAA investigators look at other files on the computer and opend them while searching for the music files? how is this legal? "Junior Lindor's resume, with his current Brooklyn address, was found on the computer in Defendant's home and, once Junior Lindor was finally located and deposed, he testified that both the Defendant and Woddy Raymond knew that he was living in Brooklyn." Please someone explain this. So Confused....... Shouldn't the RIAA have sanctions for illegal search and seasure: Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. After reading the latest “letter” from the RIAA, I have a question on admissable evidence in a court of law. As I understand the law, I am not a lawyer, if you serve a search warrent, you must list specificaly what you are searching for, and other items found that are not in plain site are not admissible in court. The current letter, dated June 17th, states that a resume found on the Lindor computer had a resume on it for someone else. Does this not PROVE that the RIAA investigators look at other files on the computer and opend them while searching for the music files? how is this legal?

“Junior Lindor’s resume, with his current Brooklyn address, was found on the computer in Defendant’s home and, once Junior Lindor was finally located and deposed, he testified that both the Defendant and Woddy Raymond knew that he was living in Brooklyn.”

Please someone explain this. So Confused…….

Shouldn’t the RIAA have sanctions for illegal search and seasure:

Amendment 4 – Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16140/comment-page-1#comment-533234 Reader's Write Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:24:16 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16140#comment-533234 I hope she turns and sues the RIAA for all they have! I hope she turns and sues the RIAA for all they have!

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16140/comment-page-1#comment-532774 Reader's Write Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:17:40 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16140#comment-532774 I don't think that there is any point wasting time dealing with these parasites in court. Just let spread the pest killer. I don’t think that there is any point wasting time dealing with these parasites in court.
Just let spread the pest killer.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16140/comment-page-1#comment-532767 Reader's Write Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:14:58 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16140#comment-532767 pfft, scumbags with their scumbag lawyers pfft, scumbags with their scumbag lawyers

]]>