Eve Burton, RIAA ’supervising attorney’
p2pnet news | RIAA News:- It’s getting harder and harder for the multi-billion-dollar Big 4 record labels, Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony BMG, and their RIAA, to maintain the illusion they’re being “devastated” by the likes of Marie Lindor, the elderly New York health aide they accused of being a massive online distributor of copyrighted music.
It’s Standard Operating Procedure for the Big 4 to first sic their RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) onto parents, knowing full well the mums and dads are completely innocent of any and all allegations of file sharing.
Then they turn on the kids, their real targets.
The RIAA has been bullying and harassing Marie Lindor for three years, finally dropping the case, instead lining up on Lindor’s daughter, Yannick Raymond-Wright, as per the SOP.
Richard Gabriel, a Holmes Owen and Bird attack lawyer, used to be in the lead, terrorising innocent American men, women and even children, on behalf of the labels.
Incredibly, however, this dedicated RIAA factotum is soon to become a judge and now stepping up is Eve Burton (right), yet another HO&B lawyer.
She’s listed as “supervising attorney for the Recording Industry Association of America”.
“Having made Marie Lindor’s life utterly miserable by falsely accusing her of illegally distributing copyrighted music, the RIAA now wants a voluntary dismissal without prejudice, says her lawyer, Ray Beckerman,” p2pnet posted yesterday.
Burton has drawn up a whole litany of fresh allegations centring on Raymond-Wright and computer she’s said to have used.
But, “that computer has now been destroyed and the evidence is gone, and Plaintiffs’ ability to prove their case has been severely and irreparably prejudiced,” claims Burton in a court document, also declaring >>>
Plaintiffs, therefore, now seek to dismiss this case, without prejudice and to file a motion to sanctions against Defendant and her counsel for discovery abuse.
Plaintiffs had expended enormous time and effort to try to find the computer at issue, while Defendant and her family have concealed evidence and denied responsibility in the face of irrefutable evidence of infringement over Defendant’s Internet account.”
Burton winds up by demanding the case be stayed until her motion has been upheld, or thrown out.
“It never ceases to amaze me the things these people will attempt to say to a judge with a straight face,” says Lindor’s lawyer, Ray Beckerman, who also runs Recording Industry vs The People which archives numerous other examples of equally egregious RIAA cases, and documents pertaining to them.
“This has got to be the most ludicrous thing I have ever seen from these attorneys, and I have seen many, many ludicrous things from these attorneys on a daily basis,” he states.
.
.Stumble It!
maintain the illusion – Marie Lindor, RIAA copyright crook, September 14, 2007
become a judge – Thomas lawyer Toder praises RIAA’s Gabriel, May 7, 2008
p2pnet – RIAA caves in over Lindor case, June 18, 2008
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.
June 19th, 2008 at 11:16 am
The piece of crap of Gabriel a judge? We can let this hapen! It would be a total discreditation of the proffession.
If this low life can be a judge then what type of other piece of shit are judge right now.
I am sorry but we definitively can not let this guy be a judge!
June 19th, 2008 at 11:58 am
well, readers write tell that the GOV guy that appointed him to be a judge!
http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite?c=Page&cid=1209635776488&pagename=GovRitter%2FGOVRLayout
via
http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2008/05/richard-gabriel-appointed-to-serve-as.html
June 19th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
come on Jon, afraid of Mc Donald’s or of Eve?
Just this tiny picture please!
http://data1.blog.de/blog/m/mechafanboy/img/euro_vs_america.jpg
June 19th, 2008 at 12:20 pm
^^ There you go
FYI, I’ve been deleting your posts (and similar ones) because I don’t allow stuff that denigrates people purely because of size, religion, gender, and so on. Doesn’t matter who they are.
Cheers!
June 19th, 2008 at 5:23 pm
Jon, that seems fair enough.
But I guess denigerating her is not based because of her adiposity, but because she is an RIAA vulture.
Because she is a RIAA vulture, IMO it is fair to poke on secondary factors like “size, religion, gender, and so on.”!
She and Her lawoffice are clearly using those “secondary”-factors as a key in what kind of cases she handles normaly!
Read her resumee, you don’t need to be a DR J. to see from that that she herself is “playing” that card when she handles cases where “size, religion, gender, and so on.” plays a factor to the keys why her client needs her help.
Thats clearly a cool calculated psychological reaction this Vultureine is hoping for:
One juror to the other in expressing his own prejudicial/racist believes wispering: “hey Pete, look what a fat lady the plaintiff has as attorney. Man is she fat”!
“ssshhh, be silent I want to here what she’s talking about”
Later in the Jury room when the jurors debate -what the plaintiffs should recieve as compensation for the pain and herrasment and all that what plaintiff has to live thru just because plaintiffs were too fat, too thin, too short, too tall, too white, too black, too asian looking or what ever other prejudicial discriminating factor based on these “secondary factors” beside Plaintiffs qualitfications for the job- they will remember how they themself experienced that human reaction of dicriminating one for his apearences and in a psychological shortcut reaction they will mirror their own guilt for having such feelings upon the defendant and will award the plaintiffs a higher judgement based on that well known and understood sheme of projection.
And this RIAA vulture is clearly playing that cart and she seems good at it, why else would her bosses dedicate so much lines for infos about that area of her practice in her “about us”-page?
She’s fair game when it comes to rediculing someone because of secondary factors i guess!
Avenue Q – Everyone’s a little bit Racist!
June 19th, 2008 at 5:28 pm
the mentioned song:
http://www.sideload.com/cb/track/?id=226084
June 19th, 2008 at 7:57 pm
shit me gets the psychological reaction totally wrong based on my wrongly reading of her resumee what “side” she works for in such cases. my first reading impression was that she woud act for the poor guy that was fired! (no idea how me came to that cocclusion since this lawyer firm does not seem to care for the “small guys” as clients anyway. Maybe me still thinks to much about gthe good in people, even when they are HRO or R&C lawyers)
It’s the other way round!
This “to much pounds for her hight”-lady works for the evil employer that fires the poor employee that has the wrong “secondary factors” for the job!
And the psychological shortcut works the other way round but as good as before;
“look Pete this defendant can’t be so bad, he has even hired this fat lawyer to defend him. Probably the Plaintiff is exagerating the secondary factors and he was fired because he is incompetent non the less. We don’t want to support incompetent Plaintiffs that play the racist card for getting big money from that nice defandant that even has such a fat counsle himself!
NOT liable, next case please!!
June 19th, 2008 at 11:39 pm
too many french fries fry the brain