<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bell Canada response to CRTC throttling probe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16197/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16197</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:04:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gate's best friends father's roomate's uncle's youngest nephew</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16197/comment-page-1#comment-547268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gate's best friends father's roomate's uncle's youngest nephew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16197#comment-547268</guid>
		<description>You know if Iam reading these numbers correctly, Bell Canda has a very very small congestion problem. And throttling is apparently not doing anything significant about it 5% to 2.5%  is saving you half the congestion, but 5% of 100 is a very small number. And it is definitely not 50% of their available bandwidth, nor has throttling saved them any in total bandwidth. It is apparent to me that their entire network is using high bandwidth ( as indicated by the charts ), and the congestion is not a result of merely p2p, but rather the result an entire country tuning into online offerings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know if Iam reading these numbers correctly, Bell Canda has a very very small congestion problem. And throttling is apparently not doing anything significant about it 5% to 2.5%  is saving you half the congestion, but 5% of 100 is a very small number. And it is definitely not 50% of their available bandwidth, nor has throttling saved them any in total bandwidth. It is apparent to me that their entire network is using high bandwidth ( as indicated by the charts ), and the congestion is not a result of merely p2p, but rather the result an entire country tuning into online offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Concerned citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16197/comment-page-1#comment-546502</link>
		<dc:creator>Concerned citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16197#comment-546502</guid>
		<description>OK A) bell assumes were all idiots
B) shape time = 10 hrs , so you use schedular and migrate p2p use to non shape time, 
C) that logically proves that they have all the bandwidth they need when i can max out my connection every time i need.
D) the addon for firefox called downloadhelper will defeat the shape and allow you to grab youTube videos at max speeds, also other videos as well....
when i can get 500Kbytes ( versus my regular 600 ) that means 2 possibilities.
1) the DPI device causes some of the slowness ( logical)
2) the true network congestion isnt 95% its 15% - 600 times .15 = 90kbytes

so in effect a more friendly idea would have been to0 shape down 40% during that time until upgrades can be done.
ANYone who would whine then would have serious issues with mentality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK A) bell assumes were all idiots<br />
B) shape time = 10 hrs , so you use schedular and migrate p2p use to non shape time,<br />
C) that logically proves that they have all the bandwidth they need when i can max out my connection every time i need.<br />
D) the addon for firefox called downloadhelper will defeat the shape and allow you to grab youTube videos at max speeds, also other videos as well&#8230;.<br />
when i can get 500Kbytes ( versus my regular 600 ) that means 2 possibilities.<br />
1) the DPI device causes some of the slowness ( logical)<br />
2) the true network congestion isnt 95% its 15% &#8211; 600 times .15 = 90kbytes</p>
<p>so in effect a more friendly idea would have been to0 shape down 40% during that time until upgrades can be done.<br />
ANYone who would whine then would have serious issues with mentality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
