<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holland nixes download law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16236/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16236</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16236/comment-page-1#comment-553925</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16236#comment-553925</guid>
		<description>&quot;A law similar to the US Home recording act, âallows consumers to make copies of CDs and other media that they had legally purchased,â and, âSince it is impossible to verify if a user downloading a file was entitled to do so under the Home Recording Act, all downloading was sanctioned.â

So downloading music is legal in US?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A law similar to the US Home recording act, âallows consumers to make copies of CDs and other media that they had legally purchased,â and, âSince it is impossible to verify if a user downloading a file was entitled to do so under the Home Recording Act, all downloading was sanctioned.â</p>
<p>So downloading music is legal in US?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16236/comment-page-1#comment-552954</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16236#comment-552954</guid>
		<description>In late 2001, NL court ruled against Kazaa BV - reversed on appeal. But by then the infamous P2P network had been sold to Sharman in Australia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In late 2001, NL court ruled against Kazaa BV &#8211; reversed on appeal. But by then the infamous P2P network had been sold to Sharman in Australia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


