<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foul-mouthed superhero earns $185.3 million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:56:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305/comment-page-1#comment-576803</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305#comment-576803</guid>
		<description>&quot; Popular movies make shitloads of money, intelligent ones don’t (but they still might get an oscar nominee). &quot;

 Who can explain it ?
 I can&#039;t.

 The item of pertinence here is that the popular movies that make a shitload of money, do so at the same time
 they are being downloaded and shared.
 The fact of downloading has zero effect on their moneymaking success.

 Zero.

 The less popular fare less well in BOTH the box office and downloading areas.

 Downloading showing ZERO apparent effect .. again.


 &quot; Nice piece of “lies , damned lies and statistics” , your piece neglects the films that dont make a profit . &quot;

 This particular poster fails to mention the biggest lies, damned lies etc .. of all of them.

   A Download equals a Lost sale.

 That&#039;s the whopper the industry rests its whole entire argument on, and has proven
 time and time again to be completely false.

 This poster neglects facts that don&#039;t support his/her bullshit.

 I too wish to see that posters own supporting facts, but we all know .. we wont.
 That poster will simply return and sling more industry hash and mix it with Ad Hominem.

 There are simply no facts to back up that poster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Popular movies make shitloads of money, intelligent ones don’t (but they still might get an oscar nominee). &#8221;</p>
<p> Who can explain it ?<br />
 I can&#8217;t.</p>
<p> The item of pertinence here is that the popular movies that make a shitload of money, do so at the same time<br />
 they are being downloaded and shared.<br />
 The fact of downloading has zero effect on their moneymaking success.</p>
<p> Zero.</p>
<p> The less popular fare less well in BOTH the box office and downloading areas.</p>
<p> Downloading showing ZERO apparent effect .. again.</p>
<p> &#8221; Nice piece of “lies , damned lies and statistics” , your piece neglects the films that dont make a profit . &#8221;</p>
<p> This particular poster fails to mention the biggest lies, damned lies etc .. of all of them.</p>
<p>   A Download equals a Lost sale.</p>
<p> That&#8217;s the whopper the industry rests its whole entire argument on, and has proven<br />
 time and time again to be completely false.</p>
<p> This poster neglects facts that don&#8217;t support his/her bullshit.</p>
<p> I too wish to see that posters own supporting facts, but we all know .. we wont.<br />
 That poster will simply return and sling more industry hash and mix it with Ad Hominem.</p>
<p> There are simply no facts to back up that poster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305/comment-page-1#comment-576606</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305#comment-576606</guid>
		<description>&quot;Good movies make money, bad movies don’t. It’s as simple as that.&quot;

Define &quot;good&quot;.  The most profitable films being churned out of the cultural cesspool known as Hollywood are the most crude, ill-conceived, poorly written low-brow humour flicks or the latest CGI-filled action/adventure/fantasy that reaks of Disney.  The studios know this sort of thing appeals to the masses, which is why profits continue to skyrocket, while the quality of movies is at an all-time low.  Popular movies make shitloads of money, intelligent ones don&#039;t (but they still might get an oscar nominee).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Good movies make money, bad movies don’t. It’s as simple as that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Define &#8220;good&#8221;.  The most profitable films being churned out of the cultural cesspool known as Hollywood are the most crude, ill-conceived, poorly written low-brow humour flicks or the latest CGI-filled action/adventure/fantasy that reaks of Disney.  The studios know this sort of thing appeals to the masses, which is why profits continue to skyrocket, while the quality of movies is at an all-time low.  Popular movies make shitloads of money, intelligent ones don&#8217;t (but they still might get an oscar nominee).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rekrul</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305/comment-page-1#comment-576595</link>
		<dc:creator>Rekrul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305#comment-576595</guid>
		<description>&quot;your piece neglects the films that dont make a profit&quot;

Good movies make money, bad movies don&#039;t. It&#039;s as simple as that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;your piece neglects the films that dont make a profit&#8221;</p>
<p>Good movies make money, bad movies don&#8217;t. It&#8217;s as simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hippie</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305/comment-page-1#comment-573880</link>
		<dc:creator>Hippie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305#comment-573880</guid>
		<description>I wonder how many times Hancock has been downloaded.
Obviously that didn&#039;t affect the box office returns.

&quot; Nice piece of “lies , damned lies and statistics” , your piece neglects the films that dont make a profit.  &quot;

 The point of this site is to point out that the statements .. a download = a lost sale, and
 downloading hurst the industry is a lie.

 Every blockbuster so far this summer, that has made them a mint, has been a top download.
 As for the films that don&#039;t make a profit, those show to have very FEW downloaders.
 This points out the reason the film didn&#039;t make much profit.
 It flat out sucked.

&quot;Am I a RIAA supporter ? no &quot;

 Stop lying, of course you are.

 &quot; but I believe in truth , &quot;
  No you don&#039;t stop lying .. all you are doing is spouting their talking points.

 &quot; if you wish to swath opinion around numbers do it ,  &quot;

 Please, show us the numbers that support your opinion ?
 Your speech sounds like a doofus that &#039;don&#039;t take no stock in that there book larnin&#039; &quot;
 The RIAA swaths opinion around FAKED numbers all the time, and ignores the numbers that
 don&#039;t support their opinions. Numbers and statistics do show the truth, the truth that once
 again, downloads of this leaked movie did not hurt the box office numbers one bit.
 That&#039;s the truth of it.

 I feel sorry for the shills, they&#039;ll be out of jobs pretty soon, especially you
 if you don&#039;t start doing better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how many times Hancock has been downloaded.<br />
Obviously that didn&#8217;t affect the box office returns.</p>
<p>&#8221; Nice piece of “lies , damned lies and statistics” , your piece neglects the films that dont make a profit.  &#8221;</p>
<p> The point of this site is to point out that the statements .. a download = a lost sale, and<br />
 downloading hurst the industry is a lie.</p>
<p> Every blockbuster so far this summer, that has made them a mint, has been a top download.<br />
 As for the films that don&#8217;t make a profit, those show to have very FEW downloaders.<br />
 This points out the reason the film didn&#8217;t make much profit.<br />
 It flat out sucked.</p>
<p>&#8220;Am I a RIAA supporter ? no &#8221;</p>
<p> Stop lying, of course you are.</p>
<p> &#8221; but I believe in truth , &#8221;<br />
  No you don&#8217;t stop lying .. all you are doing is spouting their talking points.</p>
<p> &#8221; if you wish to swath opinion around numbers do it ,  &#8221;</p>
<p> Please, show us the numbers that support your opinion ?<br />
 Your speech sounds like a doofus that &#8216;don&#8217;t take no stock in that there book larnin&#8217; &#8221;<br />
 The RIAA swaths opinion around FAKED numbers all the time, and ignores the numbers that<br />
 don&#8217;t support their opinions. Numbers and statistics do show the truth, the truth that once<br />
 again, downloads of this leaked movie did not hurt the box office numbers one bit.<br />
 That&#8217;s the truth of it.</p>
<p> I feel sorry for the shills, they&#8217;ll be out of jobs pretty soon, especially you<br />
 if you don&#8217;t start doing better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305/comment-page-1#comment-573839</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16305#comment-573839</guid>
		<description>Nice piece of &quot;lies , damned lies and statistics&quot; , your piece neglects the films that dont make a profit . This whole site is the other side of the RIAA , twisting facts and figures into what it wants to believe , misrepresenting perception and opinion as fact . You really really ought to stand back and take a look . Am I a RIAA supporter ? no , not at all , but I believe in truth , if you wish to swath opinion around numbers do it , but you just sound bitter and twisted , I feel sorry for you if you live like that .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice piece of &#8220;lies , damned lies and statistics&#8221; , your piece neglects the films that dont make a profit . This whole site is the other side of the RIAA , twisting facts and figures into what it wants to believe , misrepresenting perception and opinion as fact . You really really ought to stand back and take a look . Am I a RIAA supporter ? no , not at all , but I believe in truth , if you wish to swath opinion around numbers do it , but you just sound bitter and twisted , I feel sorry for you if you live like that .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
