<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to defeat Bell Canada traffic throttling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Sanftenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325/comment-page-1#comment-983431</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sanftenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325#comment-983431</guid>
		<description>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22141654-Evading-throttling-with-uTP-uTorrent-19a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22141654-Evading-throttling-with-uTP-uTorrent-19a" rel="nofollow">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22141654-Evading-throttling-with-uTP-uTorrent-19a</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott LeRoc</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325/comment-page-1#comment-981967</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott LeRoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325#comment-981967</guid>
		<description>So how does one defeat the Bell DPI (Deep Packet Inspection) a lot of talk no real explanation.
you can&#039;t just change the TCP port uTorrent uses (It doesn&#039;t work)   how would I use IPSec to Encapsulate my packets?  Wouldn&#039;t I have to have a VPN with Bell?
Anyone wanna break this down to plain english -  maybe provide how to with uTorrent (most prolific)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how does one defeat the Bell DPI (Deep Packet Inspection) a lot of talk no real explanation.<br />
you can&#8217;t just change the TCP port uTorrent uses (It doesn&#8217;t work)   how would I use IPSec to Encapsulate my packets?  Wouldn&#8217;t I have to have a VPN with Bell?<br />
Anyone wanna break this down to plain english &#8211;  maybe provide how to with uTorrent (most prolific)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spike</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325/comment-page-1#comment-579198</link>
		<dc:creator>Spike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325#comment-579198</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re on TekSavvy or any other isp that supports MLPPP (Multilink PPP), this will bypass the throttle. I&#039;ve been using MLPPP over a month to bond my 2 DSL lines together to make 1 faster internet connection, and it also has the added side-effect that the DPI boxes don&#039;t &quot;see&quot; it due to the different PPP packet encapsulation, thus why it bypasses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re on TekSavvy or any other isp that supports MLPPP (Multilink PPP), this will bypass the throttle. I&#8217;ve been using MLPPP over a month to bond my 2 DSL lines together to make 1 faster internet connection, and it also has the added side-effect that the DPI boxes don&#8217;t &#8220;see&#8221; it due to the different PPP packet encapsulation, thus why it bypasses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325/comment-page-1#comment-577849</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325#comment-577849</guid>
		<description>Time to switch up the ports... you think other ISP&#039;s use the same kind of technique?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to switch up the ports&#8230; you think other ISP&#8217;s use the same kind of technique?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325/comment-page-1#comment-577263</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325#comment-577263</guid>
		<description>its at the bottom of page 3/5 of the PDF Document which bell submitted

*The standard VPN TCP port is 1723/TCP, with IPSec key exchange protocol using UDP port 500/UDP, and TCP port 50
and 51 for IPSec Encapsulating Security Protocol, and IPSec Authentication Header traffic respectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its at the bottom of page 3/5 of the PDF Document which bell submitted</p>
<p>*The standard VPN TCP port is 1723/TCP, with IPSec key exchange protocol using UDP port 500/UDP, and TCP port 50<br />
and 51 for IPSec Encapsulating Security Protocol, and IPSec Authentication Header traffic respectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325/comment-page-1#comment-577034</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325#comment-577034</guid>
		<description>And which port is that? 1194, 1723 and 5000 seem to be candidates according to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And which port is that? 1194, 1723 and 5000 seem to be candidates according to:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325/comment-page-1#comment-576949</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325#comment-576949</guid>
		<description>knew someone would figure it out one day.
cheers to all involved</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>knew someone would figure it out one day.<br />
cheers to all involved</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325/comment-page-1#comment-576948</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16325#comment-576948</guid>
		<description>money spent on throttling software = waste of time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>money spent on throttling software = waste of time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


