This fucker is a bonafide INTERNET MENACE- Which just means that before, maybe he had the population of his home town laughing AT him… But because of his idiocy and stupidity and his persistence in creating 5 x 10 exp 25 fake internet identities, he has become a GLOBAL LAUGHINGSTALK.

And all I want to add to this melee is that I have not enjoyed seeing a person’s public stupidity more than I have enjoyed reading Ian Morrow’s rantings and ravings.

However, if I were Indiana, I would go to English court and have a restraining order written up that bars Ian from using the internet in regards to her business. I certyainly would ntot go to court in California to do that, and I especially would not go to court in Sweden to do that.

But every minute that Iam spends posting his very laughable threats- Not just to TPB but to the whole world, he is making life difficult for his wife. If she had any sense, she would divource his arse… In English court that is, not in Swedish court.

“Revision as of 02:07, 18 May 2007
To whom ever it may be, constantly editing this page…. The violation of our artists page is now subject of legal action in the UK. If you continually edit and defame our artist you will become subject to legal proceedings also.

This page is now down

Ian Morrow

Diector Gr8Pop Ltd

Retrieved from “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Gregg”

This guy is a true IDIOT in every sense of the word, taking on ThePirateBay is one thing: But once you create an article on Wikipedia, you have tacitly given permission for anyone in the world to edit your article, because that is the way the Encyclopedia works.

Wikipedia is not a BBS forum where you can post whatever you want, and it is not a website where you can PAY for your own PRIVATE page. It is a PUBLIC PLACE.

I feel very badly for this Indiana Gregg, because this Ian Morrow cretin/Creep has caused her to become an Internet Dirty Word in very short order.

Jamie Thomas was sharing thousands of files..They said she shared 1,702 songs by downloading them without permission and then offering them online through a Kazaa file-sharing account. Just thought I’d point out the date of the article.

Serious journalists don’t do that, they rather go to jail then give up that!

But do they are also serious enough to refrain from edit warring on wikipedia?

wishing you well,
T.Duffy

Maybe you can shed light into the issue then with respect to what incident the Morrows are refering to be telling a bit more about the infos you got from them.

confused.com

I do not follow. I am not involved in wiki editing. I have a real job at a proper newspaper I’m afraid.

cheers

So can you back up your argument and explain for example the novembr 06(!) relevance while the article appears to be started to be written in early 2007 only?

If you can’t -which seems to be the case since you (like ART!) prefers to resort to some Ad Hominem issues instead to wipe away legit questions toward you guy(s)-

Why should I write Mails to Mrs Morrow when I asked YOU to back up YOUR postings?
That makes no logical sense unless are you saying that “Cqueen” and “littleredm&m” and “IANMORROW” and that IP in the logs at the relevant timeframe are indeed Mr and Mrs Morrow themself and therefor they would be the right person to ask instead of you that just copied that part from the talkpage!
If that is the case, of course I will happily send her an email and ask for infos like you claim you did! But I fear no matter how respectful I will ask, since lying and cheating seems to be normal business fro Mr. and Mrs. Morrow that she will probably jsut complain that I wrote her “hatred e-mail” too.

With regards to you Ad Hominem attack: if you accuse “ME:wikieditor2008″ of being “SoWhy” and/or any other suspected sockpuppet, you are free (In case you have a wikieditorname registered like “Cqueen” or “kleinesrotesmundm” for example) to place the sock puppet accusation template on the respective user talk pages. They are linked behind every ~~~~ signed edit!

Coming back to my initial request.
1) Are you willing to back up your alleged found (which I accuse you of having posted yourself as “littleredm&m”) then and explain about the incosistency in the dates for example?

Since you are claiming you got infos directly from Mrs. Morrow herself, that sounds “journalistic working”-like to me, therefore:

2) Are you willing to admit that you are indeed the user “Carribeanqueen” that claimed to be a journalist too?
3) Are you willing to admit thay you are indeed the user “Reader’s Write July 13th, 2008 at 5:26 am” and “Reader’s Write July 13th, 2008 at 1:28 pm”?
4) In case you admit that you are “Carribeanqueen”, are you further willing to admit that you are “littleredm&m” too?

Thanks in advance for being a honest cooperative discussion participant!
cheers
wikieditor2008

You can also easily write to the source, Ms. Gregg, who’s email address is published in several places on the web (this is what I did).
She has sent me a good deal of information including emails between herself and a wiki editor who intervened regarding the vandalism.

She was also able to send me a document that was sent to her ex. So, I now know the name and address of the ex. It isn’t very difficult to source information if you want it.

Because given as it is and assuming there isn’t a clerical erro in the date your c+p makes no sense because (according to the hsitory at least!) the page was only created in first half of 2007 (not 2006!) and the vandalisms of the IANMORON user were also in that first half but not in November (also not November 2007). At least non vandalisms that are preserved as documented versions in the publicly viewable history.

In short your “foundings” make no sense and you better recheck them unless you want to be considered part of the “morowns swordcrossing clown”-army that seems to be in damage control mode since IAN and Indi fucked this PR stuff up so badly!

I found this on the wiki discussion page (about the stalker guy)

:The IP address: 62.226.53.35 (recent entries) based in Germany. There were previous attempts at slandering Gregg’s wiki page between the 11th and 27th November 2006, where someone, strongly suspected and presumed to be Indiana’s ex-husband, made alterations to various entries concerning Ms Gregg and her professional activities and history here on Wikipedia, These alterations to the article texts were deemed false, highly defamatory and extremely damaging and therefore the wiki page was removed. The IP addresses originating these amendments were traced as 88.64.10.236 and 88.64.24.172, both codes which relate to the Automotive Research division of Accenture GmbH.

thanks,
Art

pardon?
can you say that in english?

indiana’s new blog

What are you talking about?
the edits under the “username” IanMorow has no (publicly visible) IP address attached to them.
Even if we assume that was NOT the husband guy with the same name, but someone else, there is NO connection to a “building in germany where her ex works” viewable for non-administrative wikipedia personal.
So how do you “happen to know” then?
Are you saying you “Reader’s Write” have this admin tools to come to such conlusions?

Anyway, the “blankings” were not done by wiki but by the user with the username “IanMorrow”.

Reader’s Write July 13th, 2008 at 5:26 am <- is that you Carribeanqueen?

For instance, many of the top rap stars are habitual criminals with a long police record (I won’t call it a “rap sheet”) but these important facts, including police mug shots, when posted on Wikipedia will immediately get removed, then downgraded and eventually slowly whittled away until there’s nothing left.

Few people have the time and energy to babysit a Wikipedia page 24/7 — except for vested interests like the record companies, who don’t want anything to tarnish the golden cow they’ve been milking.

We’d be fools to believe that the only people who edit the Wikipedia pages of recording artists are the fans themselves.

In the case of Indiana Gregg, does it not seem strange to anyone that there are a lot of “fans” talking up a storm about this person all over the internet, yet her music is almost completely absent on P2P networks? Usually the two go hand-in-hand — unless the “fans” are actually shills working for the record company.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:IanMorrow

02:20, 18 May 2007 Kurykh (Talk | contribs) blocked “IanMorrow (Talk | contribs)” (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎(legal threats)

We already had Prentice staff editing his Wikipedia page, right?