Nobody is talking about your article. Everybody is talking about a chick called “indiana”! So it should be obvious that I am talking about her article!

But I must admit, you are good in being stupid!
You managed to drive me to break my own rule to not react further once I consider a discussion EOD.
Sincere congratulation for that.

cheers mate

Given that you have not done that in your latest comment I guess the other poster(s) were right, you are indeed just a sockpuppet employing troll.

So I guess I call it now too EOD with a stupid person like you.

Have a nice weekend and happy editing on monday when the sockpuppet protection on the article is lifted. I guess you and your idiot collegue sockpuppet article vandalisers will have fun then again, wont you?

*EOD*

I guess you don’t remember that you kept asking “ART” questions and then there was a long message from
you explaining to me that those are the things with “?” behind them, etc.

I see no questions I had asked you?
Are you implying you are not only DNSCyberguy like you had confessed too elsewhere when accused of that, but that you have also other sockpuppets here under even more Posternames?
because I had asked a few persons a few questions, but I’m quite sure recalling my mind that I have not asked you any so far.
Should I have asked you questions non the less, then take my apology for forgetting about it and be so nice to post a link to the questions please.

The ‘questions’ that you kept asking me to answer? remember? Those were the questions I was referring to my dear Pirate.

I don’t understand what do you mean here with “is this where those famous questions were?”!

I can further not comprehend why you are trying to engage into a discussion about “constructiveness”.

In case you haven’t grasp it, I better explicitely state it then I guess.
What I did with my before standing piece with you is called “jdn. verarschen” in german. Some also call something like i did Sarcasm!

Everybody with an IQ above toastbread would see that my classification of your discussion cababilities as “constructive” can not be ment as to be taken 100% verbatim

http://tinyurl.com/5ebd43

and thanks for proving testemony to the world how stupid some allegedly british independent filmmakers are!

*EOD*

At least from what it is publicly viewable for everyone it seems that the article indead was only created at:
14:53, 6 April 2007
and not already “6 month earlier” (thats where ksdde seems to had a slip in his selfpromoting reading compehension since it seems he confused the mentioned 06 date with november 2007) in November 2006.

Of course it could be that there was indeed an article about her already present before the 6th of April 2007 and that that one was subject to a non public revisionable page deletion!
But if that is the case then it simply makes no sense that some commenters here, at TF and elsewhere beside the WP are refering to that non publicly viewable alleged incident in contrast to all those other commenters that are refering to the “vandalism”-incident with respect to what the alleged label boss did to the artist page because he allegedly wanted people to visit only the official pages of indiana gregg for infos about her instead of the wikipedia!
THESE vandalism by user IANMORROW were done roughly a month after the publicly viewable creation date at 18 May 2007!
So it seems a few people (including the wikipedian “littleredm&m”!) are refering to alleged vandalisms prior to the date of the “official” creation time and using that when they argue with public users like Alter_Fritz, those readers writes that followed them or ksdde who seems to refere in his argumentative construct to the May 18 vandalism!
Then it must be that those few peoples are obviously insiders in the form of the artist at issue, her husband and labelboss, wikipedia administrative personal or those “journalist” that claims to have gotten info from indiana about the incident.
I doubt that wikipedia admin personal takes the time to engage in damagecontrol revisionistic commenting at the mentioned palces. So the only logical consequences that are left are it must be persons that are extremely closely related to Indiana Gregg and Ian Morrow. Probably they themself are doing this sockpuppeteering under so many different commenters names.

I think it is telling about the state of mind of those 2 persons!

Anyway Art, as I said I don’t want to interfere your “constructive” discussion with ksdde. So just ignore my observations and lets us all wait if he will show up here later and reacts to your eloquent answers!

You spoke like a true souvereign brit!

deary deary… 18 May 2007 is only 6 months AFTER November 2006… (get your time line together). I don’t understand your question about ian morrow vandalism. Guess you may know? Sounds like the ex…. The ex. The ex… lol or crazy stalker psychopath. and Who is Melissa and Ian? I think we will all have a laugh if your posts were to be looked up kraut!

I guess what I’ve written isn’t very convenient for you and obviously what Indiana wrote must have really pissed you guys off. I guess you don’t like it if your users find out that you make money through advertising and tell everyone that the site is legal (without telling them that file-sharing of copyright is ILLEGAL). A few days ago I was wondering whether I should use file-sharing for my films. Now, I think it’s a waste of time because you TPB people are just fat cats sucking away at young indepedent film maker’s chance at a livelihood because no nobody wants to invest in independent films.

sorry, I’m not a complete wank who sits in front of my computer all day waiting for you to ask me a question you idiot. As for you, I think you have some more personal issues mr. kdsde and it is clear that unless you are a complete psychopath (or Sunde, because he probably likes reading about himself, since he seems to be constantly making PR for himself), or you are an ex. It all rings like one : “ugly ex”, “I know Indiana’s real name (which, I don’t even know, maybe it is her real name. Researched it, didn’t find it), “history of wikipedia (which apparently the ex was vandalising last year), combined with a lot of emotional language (nearing hatred) of someone you claim not to know? I don’t think that even someone from TPB would be
that bitter. I mean, since she’s so ’stupid’ and things like they claim.

Sorry mate, you’re definitely the ex.

classic

sorry, noticed your date mentioning only after rereading. What is the significance of that timespan while the IANMOROW “visit our official page”-vandalism took place already a half year before that?
18 May 2007 for example

So please elaborate if you don’t want to have your post looking like smoke and mirrors set up/initiated/payed by Mellissa and Ian to distract from their wrongdoings.

Can you back up your claims in any way with scans of paper proofs of that info?
Would be interesting since that at least would show that ART is a moron when he claims that IANMOROW who changed the page to “visit our official page” is a disgruntled ex.

:The IP address: 62.226.53.35 (recent entries) based in Germany. There were previous attempts at slandering Gregg’s wiki page between the 11th and 27th November 2006, where someone, strongly suspected and presumed to be Indiana’s ex-husband, made alterations to various entries concerning Ms Gregg and her professional activities and history here on Wikipedia, These alterations to the article texts were deemed false, highly defamatory and extremely damaging and therefore the wiki page was removed. The IP addresses originating these amendments were traced as 88.64.10.236 and 88.64.24.172, both codes which relate to the Automotive Research division of Accenture GmbH.

I already told that me isn’t her ex.
Are you able to react in answering my question instead of repeating/reposting what already was posted?

What ever the reason that so few comments are showing up on the blogspot are, here is what me send to be published there:

–
Anonymous not sharing her album guy said…

so “Indi” you changed your mind again?
Is it now better suited to say you are with filesharers?
Last time you opend your mouth you claimed you find it great that a mid 30ty mother of two teenage boys was hit with an idiotic $222k judgement!

What sparked your change in attitude?
some british fucked up filesharing youth with knives already showing up at your home?
your labelboss and husband ian told you that it was a bad idea to say that fileharers (who happends to be most times die hard fans!) should be punished hard?

Or just another incident of your character swineness lurking thru that you would do/say what ever seems to be the most oportunistic at a given situation?

If you weren’t already such a nonentity that nobody cares and/or want her music anyway, then at least after this latest rant of yours that shows how false you are you should deserve to be forgotten and ignored!

July 13, 2008 4:15 PM
–

“who gives a shot that he wrote again a piece?
It’s not that she uses her “homepage” (which by the way last time i visit it is still touting the last year (!) october single release as a “pre order thingy”! or the blogspot page to have some real interaction.
Probaby her imo ugly looking husband told her “you must have such stuff to be “in”.
She is just a false character swine and just should be ignored!”

That sounds like ex or stalker. That doesn’t sound like random comment. Are you the ex that left three children, I just read it in the biography in the homepage you were talking about?
sick

But i’m definetly not the guy that fucked her in highschool! I had rather shoot myself!

but what is “strange” about my observation that her homepage is lying dead for over 11 month now?

what has my observation that she used her homepage only as an (allegedly not successfull) vehicle to promote her album that noone seems to want to do with your ability to “smell a rat”?

Me does not understand!