5 reasons to steer clear of the iPhone
p2pnet news view Open Source | Mobiles:- Rogers has given people plenty of reason to keep well away from Apple’s iPhone 3G, aka the Jesus phone in honour of its second coming.
Now the Free Software Foundation has come up with five more, namely:
- iPhone completely blocks free software. Developers must pay a tax to Apple, who becomes the sole authority over what can and can’t be on everyone’s phones.
- iPhone endorses and supports Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) technology.
- iPhone exposes your whereabouts and provides ways for others to track you without your knowledge.
- iPhone won’t play patent- and DRM-free formats like Ogg Vorbis and Theora.
- iPhone is not the only option. There are better alternatives on the horizon that respect your freedom, don’t spy on you, play free media formats, and let you use free software — like the FreeRunner.
Says the post >>>
“This is the phone that has changed phones forever,” Mr. Jobs said.
We agree. A snake oil salesman not satisfied with his business of pushing proprietary software and Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) technology into your home, Jobs has set his sights on getting DRM and proprietary software into your pocket as well.
There is a reason so much emphasis was put on the visual design of the iPhone. There is a reason that Apple is so concerned about unsightly seams that they won’t even let you change the battery in your own phone.
Apple, through its marketing and visual design techniques, is manufacturing an illusion that merely buying an Apple makes you part of an alternative community.
But the technology they use is explicitly chosen to divide people into separate digital cells, and to position Apple as sole warden. When your business depends on people paying for the privilege of being locked up, the prison better look and feel luxurious, and the bars better not be too visible.
Wait, locked up? Prison? It’s a phone. Aren’t we being a little extreme?
Unfortunately, we are not. The extreme here is represented by Jobs and Apple. The iPhone is an attack on very old and fundamental values — the value of people having control over their stuff rather than their stuff having control over them, the right to freely communicate and share with others, and the importance of privacy.
The iPhone does make phone calls, but it is not just a phone. It is a general-purpose computer, more powerful in terms of hardware than the ones we might have had sitting on our desks just a few years ago. It’s also a tracking device, and like other proprietary GPS-enabled phones, can transmit your location without your knowledge.
As of November 2007, 3.3 billion people in the world had mobile telephones, and the number continues to rise rapidly. For many of these people, phones are becoming the most important computers they own. They are vital to their communications and they are with them all the time. Of all the technology people use that could be turned against them, this is one of the most frightening possibilities.
But there is an important difference between the iPhone and prior general-purpose computers: The iPhone is broken, on purpose. It is in theory capable of running many different kinds of programs, but software applications and media will be limited via Apple’s ironically named Digital Restrictions Management technology — “FairPlay”.
FoulPlay
Apple’s DRM system monitors your activities and tells you what you are and are not allowed to do. What you are not allowed to do is install any software that Apple doesn’t like. This restriction prevents you from installing free software — software whose authors want you to freely share, copy and modify their work.
Free software has given us many exciting things on the desktop — the GNU/Linux operating system, the Firefox web browser, the OpenOffice.org suite, the Apache webserver that runs most of the web sites on the internet. Why would we want to buy a computer that goes out of its way to obstruct the freedom of such creators?
This system is not Apple’s only FoulPlay. iPhones can now also only be activated in stores — despite the fact that in the U.S., the Register of Copyrights ruled that consumers have the right to unlock their phones and switch to a different carrier.
Fingerpointing (and we don’t mean the touch screen)
Jobs would have us believe that all of these restrictions are necessary. He nods and agrees when we complain about them, and says that he doesn’t like them either. He claims that Apple is forced to include them for our own good — for the safety of the whole telephone network, and to allow access to all the movies and music we want.
But it’s been a year and a half since Jobs, under pressure from the public, spoke out strongly against DRM and in favor of freedom. With great hesitation, he allowed a handful of files to go DRM-free on iTunes, but kept in place the requirement that they be purchased using the proprietary, DRM-infected iTunes software. Since then, he has done absolutely nothing to act on those words. In his movie and video ventures, he has continued to push DRM. And now he’s bringing it to mobile software applications as well. It’s become clear that those words were a ploy to defuse opposition.
The truth is that there are thousands of software, music, and media creators who want to share their work more freely. It’s funny — as in reprehensible — because Apple’s OS X operating system was in fact largely built on software written by people who voluntarily made their work free to others for further copying, modification and improvement. When people have the freedom to tinker, create, and innovate, they make exciting and useful creations. People have already been writing their own free software to run mobile platforms. The telephone network is still standing.
We know Jobs is afraid of competition, and is manufacturing threats and excuses. This is simply a business decision, and it’s a kind of business we shouldn’t support. Jobs wants the iPhone to restrict you because he wants your money and increased control is a means to that — he wants to take as much from you as possible, give you back as little as possible, and keep his costs at the absolute minimum. He’s trying to make sure that nobody writes software for the iPhone to do things that he doesn’t want the iPhone to be able to do — such software might make FoulPlay less foul, play alternative media formats, show the user exactly what’s being communicated from the phone to the people monitoring it, or even disable transmission of that information.
Being the future we want to see
Fortunately, we will soon be able to have all the convenience of a mobile computer that also makes phone calls without selling our freedom to Apple, Microsoft, BlackBerry, or anyone else. The Neo FreeRunner is a promising free-software phone, being developed in cooperation with the same worldwide community responsible for the GNU/Linux operating system. These are creators who want to share their work and who want you and others to be able to do what they did — build on the work of people who came before them to make new, empowering devices.
Jobs built on the work of people before him too, only his answer is to kick away the ladder and try to prevent anyone else from doing what he did. His customers are fighting back — according to Apple in October 2007, over 250,000 of the 1.4 million iPhones sold were unlocked by their users. Rather than embracing this, Jobs thinks it should be stopped.
“We have a choice,” says the post, adding:
“The FreeRunner doesn’t yet do as much as the iPhone and it’s certainly not as pretty. But in terms of potential, the fact that it’s supported by a worldwide community of people rather than a single greedy, dishonest and secretive entity puts it light-years ahead. We can trade our freedom and our money to get something flashy on the surface, or we can spend a little more money, keep our freedom, and support a better kind of business. If we want businesses to be ethical, we have to reward the ones that are. By not enriching companies that want to take away our freedom and by rewarding those that respect us, we will be helping to bring about a better future.”
For more information
http://www.gnu.org
http://defectivebydesign.org
http://playogg.org
http://www.openmoko.com
http://wiki.openmoko.org
http://creativecommons.org
With iPhone, ‘Security’ Is Code for ‘Control’ – Bruce Schneier
.
.Stumble It!
plenty of reason – Rogers fact adjustment specialist caught out, July 11, 2008
Free Software Foundation – 5 reasons to avoid iPhone 3G, July 10, 2008
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.
July 12th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
Well, I know that if my iMac and Macbook prevented me from doing any of the things that the iPhone doesn’t want me to, they would be kicked to the kerb in a day.
I would say that over 95% of my day with my iMac is spent using software that hasn’t been authorised by Apple and doesn’t need to be either.
Keeping the iPhone a closed platform is simply too much control.
I control my Macs and I’m very happy about it.
July 13th, 2008 at 6:59 am
I don’t see how making a link available to Freerunner as an alternative is a positive thing. It looks like something from 1973 and it is in NO way in the same league as the multi touch compatible itouch/phone. In all honestly its their platform, they have invested millions of dollars on it, they are trying to control it as they see fit. We will most likely see hacks on it just like on previous generation touches/phones. I don’t think there is a need to despair.
July 13th, 2008 at 2:05 pm
Even better just say NO to the iphone, and jailbreak an iPod Touch. You won’t have to worry about DRM or GPS tracking with a touch.
I’ve enjoyed the benefits of MORE innovation than Apple’s idiotic ‘appstore’ for the past *2 years*. Why would I want to move to Apple’s *inferior* platform??
If you run Apple kit, then control it. Yourself.
July 13th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
DRM is in all Apple products, including Touch. Otherwise, Touch would not be able to play Apple’s C.R.A.P. from iTunes store.
July 13th, 2008 at 6:58 pm
Oh for God’s sake Jon, “snake oil salesman?”, “an attack”?, “a prison”? It’s a sleek handheld gizmo, a fancy, pricey GADGET that nobody needs if they don’t want it. And the best part is: NOBODY has to buy it. NObody, not you, or me or anyone else.
What’s all this about? A-run-of-the-mill household AIR conditioner—for crying out loud– has more rights management on it than the iPHONE.
It’s branded by a single manufacturer and the front plastic bezel fits only on that one model. You have to use their proprietary filters because the others won’t fit. A GE’s condenser coil won’t install or work in a Freidrich or a Panasonic, either. You can’t even turn it up any higher that they allow you to: it’s all preset with limits at the factory. The power cord is the length that they dictate and that’s that. It comes in ONE color. You take it (or not) with the features they offer. Period. And horrors, you MUST use an “authorized” repair technician, in fact you CANNOT open it or even repair it yourself, and you must pay for and use only authorized parts from the manufacturers factory at whatever price they specify or you void your own warranty and then they can walk away from you and never look back. And it’s a freakin’ AC, Jon, an AIR CONDITIONER.
And you know what? You run your very good website on YOUR terms, don’t you?
They have every right to design, market and sell the products they wish to sell, and offer them and warranty them precisely as they wish, with features and under terms they specify and enforce exactly as they see fit.
And you can buy it as it is, or buy a different air conditioner……or you can buy none at all or even build your own from scratch.
All perfectly legal, all your freedom of choice.
Geeze, Jon. Don’t buy the iPHONE either.
July 14th, 2008 at 8:12 pm
For someone who’s apparently read the article and shared his two cents, it seems to have escaped him that Jon didn’t write any of the quoted words above. Or maybe it doesn’t matter to him that he can’t tell between Jon and the FSF.
Oh, wait. It doesn’t matter.