Jamie Thomas was sharing thousands of files..They said she shared 1,702 songs by downloading them without permission and then offering them online through a Kazaa file-sharing account. Just thought I’d point out the date of the article.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/a111725/townshend-slates-heartless-downloading.html

this is kid rock concerning itunes here:
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/a101582/kid-rock-explains-itunes-refusal.html

however, kid rock also takes a stand against pirating in a cynical way:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpCADfZD-eg

In another relatively chilling blog, you might consider this blog too because this, indeed, may be where government is heading:
benefit of the doubt, maybe there is something Gregg knows that we haven’t considered:

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=41311907&blogID=415405493

cheers and good luck to you all.

T. Duffy

(with regard to your question). When it comes to sourced information, I am afraid that I will not share that information with you. However, you are welcome to read about
it once the story is published.

It seems the squatters that formerly resided on her wiki page are now taking a squat here on P2P net.

Big orchestra comes in (of course, no budget for that because no investor will pay for the mighty philharmonic anymore due to
P2P killing movies, but, hey, let’s pretend) Massive orchestra and the violent sea rips through as the ship heads straight into danger.

The pirates of the titantic grasp their ropes and abandon ship.

and then….

I need another pint mate!

the quote: Last year, in an article on Sky News, I read that a woman was fined a massive fine for file sharing on the Kazaa network. I thought, great! The police are coming.Then my husband sent me a link to another article titled “Should You Pay For Music?”. I instantly thought….eh? Has the world gone mad? It’s like saying “Should you pay for petrol?”or “Should you pay for bread?”….. hey, maybe I was being too ‘traditional’? I guess you could compare it to you, yourself working all week long. You go to the bank and cash your check, and the banker takes your money without putting it into your account.
But, it’s much deeper than this. Whether or not the public is offered music for free or at a cost is not the real issue. The real problem lies in the fact that ’share’ sites are making money by pointing to ‘other people’s copyrighted content’… ” (unquote)

I shall interpunct now: This does not imply that she took pleasure because someone was fined. This implies that at that point she thought that a policing of the internet would follow. I am an english scholar. I can read. I can write. I write and edit scripts for a living mate. Interpunct? You’re a nutter.

do Not change meanings of something someone said by changing the interpunction!

what you cite is NOT what she wrote/said/ment!

Unless you claim she is stupid and not able to use basic interpuntion and wording styles in her mother language!

Remember Reader’s Write: only try to rewrite history if you are the winner and can manipulate the sources as fitting your agenda.
In your case it does not work since we have her original!

She said something completely different!

She didn’t say that attacking Jammie Thomas was a great idea. She said ‘great, the internet police are coming’
which means, something is finally being done about illegal file sharing. Let’s face it kids, stealing is illegal.
There was a trial for the Kazaa woman and there must have been enough evidence to give that woman that penalty.
The penalty was harsh, however, file-sharing has caused people to lose their jobs who also have children. The
point being is that file-sharing of copyright content is, indeed, ILLEGAL. This is something that you absolutely
cannot argue about in any way. It is impossible to argue the fact that it is ILLEGAL. It is written on every CD and
DVD and piece of software. It is in the iTunes terms of agreement. no duplication, etc.

Now, take that to the bank.

Somehow this doesn’t make a lot of sense. Existing fans wouldn’t need to download the album because them being fans would get the real thing anyhow.

Potential fans are completely out the question the moment she thought that attacking Jammie Thomas was a great idea.

I wouldn’t bother anymore, kd.

Art has demonstrated beyond a doubt that he has nothing to hang his hat on, so to speak, and
only intends to stir you up, even to the point of racial slurs.

He’s trolling.

It’s time we stop feeding the troll.

http://img105.imageshack(.)us/img105/5497/onguardbig1df.jpg

HRK-packt sie und zerhackt sie
(ART see your sockpuppet playing field where you play as DNS cyberguy for some comment. And then please come back HERE to be so nice and answer the serious questions that people asked you instead of resorting to your ad hominem attacks if you are man enough to face the truth!)

“Sorry kraut, I don’t fully understand your post.”

Kraut? First and last warning, Art.

Cheers!

Bit comical. Big Torrent (world’s biggest) search engine picks on little indie label? Expects little indie-girl to back off and feel humiliated.
Indie girl speaks up for herself and points out sensitive point of big Engine’s business probs. Big Engine gets mad…. Sounds
like a good film. Kind of David and Goliath eh?

Now big engine tries to make it look like little indie artist had some superpowers. Plot develops. Might speak to some TV channels about
this one. Do a documentary?

I’m here for a laugh, but, what are these questions?

Just taking note of the “PR-worthy” comment above by….oh, of course, kdsde (ex/stalker?). Mate, no idea what you mean. let’s see, we have a ‘reposting of a rant’ made by Indiana. Then something about TF asking if they could repost her rant. ok, some legal publishings? what were those?

Sorry kraut, I don’t fully understand your post. I’ve not been a stalker as long as you I guess. So, you’ll have to explain to me how this new theory of yours works.

later, I hope to make a movie from this.

I do agree that TPB are like diggin’ for gold with any PR they can muster though. Even indie musicians. Bit naf aye?

Cordially
ART

what relevance has the suspected sockpuppet investigation with 3 millions or whith who makes a clown out of whom?

Btw in my opinion I would say its indiana who “did the clown” since she thought that reposting a rant she wrote in october last year as answer to an ACTUAL dispute she has with TPB.
And then she is a bit complaining now that the internet community is calling her names for that and argues that she could not forsee that her piece would for example be republished by TF.
But as she contents, TF did not jsut grab it and reposted it with indifference to the copyrightowner of that rant, she gave her explicit PERMISSIOn to TF do republish it.

SO it was her that though it would be “PR-wothy” to have some even bigger aftermath following the /legal publishings.
Which by the way were probably forgotten relatively unnoticed since the last entry by the prince Charles huckabay freak was so long gone and the visits in the /legal section were (as I alledge without having visit figures at hand now) most likely ignoreable before IAN and INDI draw their swords by rewarming 8 month old postings by themself!

P.S. ART where are you? Me and others are still waiting for answers from you!!

( notice how they are trying so hard to get away from providing supporting sources, by
using personal attacks to divert attention from the fact that they have no facts )

C’mon,

” torrent freak even published that TPB makes $3 million/year. ”

Still waiting for supporting references …

Report submission by

Admiral Norton (talk) 13:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Evidence
Compare Special:Contributions/Carribeanqueen and Special:Contributions/Littleredm&m. All of their contributions revolve around the Indiana Gregg page. Also, Littleredm&m was created in early May ([1]), but became active only today, two days after Carribeanqueen’s activities ceased. This leads me to think Carribeanqueen uses sockpuppets to engage in a dispute.
Comments
I have added 82.9.58.47 to the list of suspected and recently active socks. The account “Littleredm&m” was created on May 19, 2007, a day after IanMorrow (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log), the husband of Indiana Gregg, was blocked indefinitely for legal threats. These accounts most likely belong to him as he has continued editing the article also from IP addresses starting with 82.9.x.x ([2]). Prolog (talk) 14:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Conclusions

The pirate bay boys are so busy trying to be internet superstars that they end up looking
like twats. They make the whole p2p community look stupid. The are constantly raising
up a stink.

The reason why they do so much PR? more users, more advertisers, more dosh! if they
would keep their fucking mouths shut it wouldn’t ruin it for everyone else. our torrent has
no advertising. we don’t have as many people, but, we aren’t criticised constantly either.
when someone wants their link down, we just take it down and don’t create a circus around
it.

So true. Peter Sunde is a complete clown. They look like twats as you say. Publishing emails
and making fuss over little indie artists. TPB are morons.