<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time to WASTE?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16375/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16375</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:23:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16375/comment-page-1#comment-591166</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16375#comment-591166</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.jesusonic.com/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Last I heard&lt;/a&gt;, Frankel was working on a line of guitar FX pedals - he seems to be a brilliant guy but maybe that doesn&#039;t always imply a long attention span. So is WASTE abandonware? It&#039;s hard to say. How do you distinguish between an invisible success and an invisible failure? Maybe the internet&#039;s full of happy WASTE users, privately chatting and sharing files in groups of ten to fifty, and we just haven&#039;t been invited to the party. But somehow I doubt it - people talk, and even if we weren&#039;t invited to the party I think we&#039;d know there was a party going on.

But even if WASTE hasn&#039;t conquered the world it isn&#039;t completely dead. It looks like someone&#039;s still &lt;a href=&#039;http://sourceforge.net/projects/wasteagain/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;maintaining the code&lt;/a&gt;, and there&#039;s at least &lt;a href=&#039;http://wastekeyexchange.blogspot.com/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one public network&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&#039;http://waste.vimicorp.com/keys/?p=1&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;maybe two&lt;/a&gt;) where you can try out the software with a group of strangers - not quite what WASTE was designed for, but maybe it will encourage a few people to start their own networks. And if it works as intended, we&#039;ll never know. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.jesusonic.com/' rel="nofollow">Last I heard</a>, Frankel was working on a line of guitar FX pedals &#8211; he seems to be a brilliant guy but maybe that doesn&#8217;t always imply a long attention span. So is WASTE abandonware? It&#8217;s hard to say. How do you distinguish between an invisible success and an invisible failure? Maybe the internet&#8217;s full of happy WASTE users, privately chatting and sharing files in groups of ten to fifty, and we just haven&#8217;t been invited to the party. But somehow I doubt it &#8211; people talk, and even if we weren&#8217;t invited to the party I think we&#8217;d know there was a party going on.</p>
<p>But even if WASTE hasn&#8217;t conquered the world it isn&#8217;t completely dead. It looks like someone&#8217;s still <a href='http://sourceforge.net/projects/wasteagain/' rel="nofollow">maintaining the code</a>, and there&#8217;s at least <a href='http://wastekeyexchange.blogspot.com/' rel="nofollow">one public network</a> (<a href='http://waste.vimicorp.com/keys/?p=1' rel="nofollow">maybe two</a>) where you can try out the software with a group of strangers &#8211; not quite what WASTE was designed for, but maybe it will encourage a few people to start their own networks. And if it works as intended, we&#8217;ll never know. <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
