Wikileaks reports on Mohawk debacle
p2pnet news view P2P | Freedom:- On June 29, 2007, people from the Tyendinaga Mohawk territory in southeastern Ontario blocked the CN Railway Line running through their land the Highway 401, and Highway 2.
They were protesting conditions on First Nations reservations across Canada and the Government of Canada’s sluggishness in resolving outstanding land claims, says Wikileaks, going on »»»
“Blockade spokesman Shawn Brant faces multiple charges stemming from these actions, and the Crown prosecutor is currently seeking a 12 year minimum sentence.
“During the preliminary inquiry to Shawn Brant’s trial, it came out that the Ontario Provincial Police, headed by Commissioner Julian Fantino, had been using wiretaps on more than a dozen different Mohawks without a judge’s authorization, an action almost unheard of recent history in Canada.
Those conversations between Julian Fantino and Shawn Brant were presented as testimony during the pre-trial hearing.
The Crown obtained a publication ban during the preliminary inquiry, which was challenged last week by the Canadian Broadcasting Company after they found out that the O.P.P. had officers posing as cameramen during the Day of Action, a tactic that has recently been condemned by the Ipperwash Inquiry.
The publication ban was lifted by a judge last Thursday (July 17th).
Various news agencies published initial analysis on the testimony and on July 18th, the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered the publication ban re-instated until an appeal hearing next week.
Wikileaks has zipped some of news stories covering the incident. Click here to download it, as well as a CBC video of the incident.
Says a CBC report in part »»»
Brant’s defence lawyer, Peter Rosenthal has called on the province to launch a review of the statements and actions of Fantino, who personally came to Napanee at the time of the standoff despite regular contact between protesters and other OPP officers.
Fantino testified at the preliminary hearing that he gave Brant a deadline, and was prepared to move in if the protesters didn’t lift the blockades. He said he believed the public interest demanded that the highway be reopened.
“There were in fact plans underway at that time for a forced removal of the blockade, were there?” Rosenthal asked him during his testimony.
“Yes, there was,” Fantino replied. “There comes a time when the balance of the greater public good shifts, and the feeling was that under the circumstances, this situation could no longer continue, and we were, in fact, preparing to move on the blockades.”
The raid ultimately did not happen, and protesters removed the blockades peacefully later in the day. But the closures snarled traffic and brought commercial rail traffic to a standstill for several hours on a day that featured peaceful protests across the country.
The documents include court transcripts of Rosenthal reading out statements from the police wiretaps of at least three conversations between Fantino and Brant in the early hours of June 29 about removing the barriers.
Rosenthal quoted Fantino as saying: “I think we’re running out of time, Shawn. You know, we’ve been back and forth all night on this, and we’ve got a lot of very angry people who are absolutely beyond themselves with what’s going on, and, you know, we just have to close shop here, and we can’t go on any longer to be honest with you.”
Brant is quoted as replying that he needed to speak with several members of the group in order to reach “consensus” on ending the blockade.
“Sometimes the wheels turn slowly, but, you know, it’s important that, you know, we came in here on a consensus and we need to resolve this on a consensus,” he is quoted as saying.
Fantino then told Rosenthal he believed that was a “stalling tactic” and that Brant had full control over the protesters.
Rosenthal also brought up the provincial police document titled A Framework for Police Preparedness for Aboriginal Critical Incidents, which was created after the Ipperwash affair.
The document calls for building a “trusting relationship” with “mutual respect” between the culture of aboriginals and police, as well as a need for “special concerns” with respect to aboriginal protests and blockades, given their historical rights.
“And doesn’t, though, that document and many other documents speak to the way you should do that in situations involving aboriginal protesters?” Rosenthal asked.
“Mr. Rosenthal, these are guidelines and they’re principles,” Fantino replied. “They’re not a firm and fixed mandated way of doing business.”
Police wiretapped calls without judicial approvalThe legality of the wiretaps was called into question by Brant’s lawyer during his pre-trial hearing, as police did not receive judicial approval for the recordings. Police have said the recordings were legal, citing a little-known emergency provision in the Criminal Code of “interception in exceptional circumstances.”
But Brant’s lawyer said the police’s use of wiretapping in the case was “outrageous.”
“How often are the OPP using wiretaps without a judge’s permission in the province?” Rosenthal told CBC News in an interview outside the courtroom.
Fantino testified that he was aware the conversations with Brant were being recorded, but said he had no role in the decision to wiretap the calls.
In Canada, proceedings from preliminary hearings are usually protected by publication bans in order to protect the accused person’s right to a fair trial, especially when the case might later go before a jury.
However, Brant, whose trial is scheduled to begin in January, waived his right to a publication ban in this case, saying he wanted the testimony from the preliminary hearing to be made public.
The judge imposed a ban anyway, after the Crown requested one, but a different judge lifted it Friday in Napanee after a CBC News legal team argued for the right to publish the material. On Friday afternoon, the Crown won a stay on the order lifting the publication ban, reinstationg the publication ban.
But Friday evening, after a legal challenge by CBC News, the publication ban was lifted again.
Jon Newton - p2pnet
(Thanks, Mireille)





p2pnet - rss feed: 
July 21st, 2008 at 3:23 pm
This is just sad, were turning into America, corporation get everything they want, our police force is above the law, and now were even looking for an excuse to get rid of the Indians.
July 21st, 2008 at 3:38 pm
I hope the privacy commissioner gets involved and sues on their behalf.
July 21st, 2008 at 4:21 pm
well, that happends when the supperiour white male has a problem with some redskins!
There were times those indians where not wiretabbed, they were shot!
Good ol’ days of wild west!
warning comment can contain cynism!
July 21st, 2008 at 4:23 pm
we need indiana greegs interent passports agaisnt the new wild west when those indians start again in attacking trains…
Last time I saw that was in a legal torrent western with john wayne!
July 22nd, 2008 at 11:59 pm
If they would have spent one tenth the energy they wasted on the whole spying process in simply carrying the message from the Mohawk to the Federal government that:
They, the government, are not obeying their own law
They, the police, are charged with enforcing the law
Ergo…
The whole thing could have been taken care of with grace and wit, and the police could have performed their duty in a way that would set them in history forever.