<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Child Online Protection Act &#8216;unconstitutional&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-627436</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-627436</guid>
		<description>haha above post said "hocker"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha above post said &#8220;hocker&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-626834</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-626834</guid>
		<description>@ bah

not sure if you were sarcastic, in case you weren't:

What the hell has children to do alone unsuperwised by a parent sitting in front of a PC monitor and "surfing on the internet"?
you don't allow your kid to explore the "interesting" districts of your city alone. (And if you do and the police spots your kid lonely wandering around the red light district and talking to a hocker I bet child protection will have some serious talking with you)

you don't need new laws to "protect" children online! you need serious education that children do not belong alone on the internet! 
This stupid mother of this mentally sick girl for example that killed herself allegedly because of that phony boyfriend incidnet with that female adult neighbor is/was one of the candidates for child protection services! 
Why the hell is it that the most incompetent parents and the most stupid politicians alwasy claim "child protection" to try to ban stuff that is perfectly fine for adults that are mature enough to wander around alone on the internet?

These guys are all censoring control freak nazi's.

And nowadays those guys from the MAFIAA are using the disguise of "protecting the children online" too to tighten their grip on this medium of free expression among mature adults!
The internet is not "a children playground". 
Children KEEP OUT (or only visiting under constant tight supervision)
Leave this adult space alone!
This also goes for the New York AG that allegedly cooperates and gets his data from those cybercriminals Randy S. and Octavio (sp?) H. from Artist Direct Company MediaDefender according to the emails that were publicly viewable on that internetpage back then.

Shame on all of you control freaks and shame on your false flag agendas. In reality you give a shit about the children. It's just your controlfreak desire that you want to satisfy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ bah</p>
<p>not sure if you were sarcastic, in case you weren&#8217;t:</p>
<p>What the hell has children to do alone unsuperwised by a parent sitting in front of a PC monitor and &#8220;surfing on the internet&#8221;?<br />
you don&#8217;t allow your kid to explore the &#8220;interesting&#8221; districts of your city alone. (And if you do and the police spots your kid lonely wandering around the red light district and talking to a hocker I bet child protection will have some serious talking with you)</p>
<p>you don&#8217;t need new laws to &#8220;protect&#8221; children online! you need serious education that children do not belong alone on the internet!<br />
This stupid mother of this mentally sick girl for example that killed herself allegedly because of that phony boyfriend incidnet with that female adult neighbor is/was one of the candidates for child protection services!<br />
Why the hell is it that the most incompetent parents and the most stupid politicians alwasy claim &#8220;child protection&#8221; to try to ban stuff that is perfectly fine for adults that are mature enough to wander around alone on the internet?</p>
<p>These guys are all censoring control freak nazi&#8217;s.</p>
<p>And nowadays those guys from the MAFIAA are using the disguise of &#8220;protecting the children online&#8221; too to tighten their grip on this medium of free expression among mature adults!<br />
The internet is not &#8220;a children playground&#8221;.<br />
Children KEEP OUT (or only visiting under constant tight supervision)<br />
Leave this adult space alone!<br />
This also goes for the New York AG that allegedly cooperates and gets his data from those cybercriminals Randy S. and Octavio (sp?) H. from Artist Direct Company MediaDefender according to the emails that were publicly viewable on that internetpage back then.</p>
<p>Shame on all of you control freaks and shame on your false flag agendas. In reality you give a shit about the children. It&#8217;s just your controlfreak desire that you want to satisfy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-626093</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-626093</guid>
		<description>Aaaah, the brainwashed masses just simply can not see Political Posturing for what it REALLY is....................................... So who are YOU going to "vote" for in November??????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaah, the brainwashed masses just simply can not see Political Posturing for what it REALLY is&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; So who are YOU going to &#8220;vote&#8221; for in November??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-625002</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-625002</guid>
		<description>"Hey, we’re all against any protection of children here, right?" 

Not true. But their is a constitution; it is one of the best in the world and it should be enforced.

True protecting or kids is very important but every thing is a question of balance and some are too happy to use this pretext that we have to protect our kid to infringe the freedom of speach.

Amaxingly enought it is those same neo-con pederasts in congress that are the most likly to harm our kid and our freedom of speach at the same time! We definitively don't need them to protect our kid! 

We are doing the job ourselves and a lot better than them indeed! Obviously we don't need them eiyher to protect our country agaisnt terrorists! And by the way where is Ben Laden?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hey, we’re all against any protection of children here, right?&#8221; </p>
<p>Not true. But their is a constitution; it is one of the best in the world and it should be enforced.</p>
<p>True protecting or kids is very important but every thing is a question of balance and some are too happy to use this pretext that we have to protect our kid to infringe the freedom of speach.</p>
<p>Amaxingly enought it is those same neo-con pederasts in congress that are the most likly to harm our kid and our freedom of speach at the same time! We definitively don&#8217;t need them to protect our kid! </p>
<p>We are doing the job ourselves and a lot better than them indeed! Obviously we don&#8217;t need them eiyher to protect our country agaisnt terrorists! And by the way where is Ben Laden?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bah</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-624840</link>
		<author>bah</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-624840</guid>
		<description>Hey, we're all against any protection of children here, right? I mean, screw kids--who do they think they are needing protection? Let them suffer like the rest of us. And what's all this about innocence? Pfft. . .let's get them integrated into our corrupt society as soon as possible! Who's with me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, we&#8217;re all against any protection of children here, right? I mean, screw kids&#8211;who do they think they are needing protection? Let them suffer like the rest of us. And what&#8217;s all this about innocence? Pfft. . .let&#8217;s get them integrated into our corrupt society as soon as possible! Who&#8217;s with me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rekrul</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-624570</link>
		<author>Rekrul</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16486#comment-624570</guid>
		<description>Anyone wanna take bets on what the next version of this law will be called after this one is declared unconstitutional? After all, two defeats of basically the same law aren't nearly enough to discourage them from wasting more money by trying again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone wanna take bets on what the next version of this law will be called after this one is declared unconstitutional? After all, two defeats of basically the same law aren&#8217;t nearly enough to discourage them from wasting more money by trying again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
