<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big 4 labels, studios, totally out of control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519/comment-page-1#comment-635247</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519#comment-635247</guid>
		<description>these are the govts you voted in. Think about it.

No Jon, I don&#039;t think we&#039;re still buying the &quot;cookie cutter crap&quot; (ccc), but a small element who want this and can&#039;t find it online or don&#039;t have access to a PC and whose parents can afford it seem to be. Maybe they just need educating in file sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these are the govts you voted in. Think about it.</p>
<p>No Jon, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re still buying the &#8220;cookie cutter crap&#8221; (ccc), but a small element who want this and can&#8217;t find it online or don&#8217;t have access to a PC and whose parents can afford it seem to be. Maybe they just need educating in file sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Roy Garner</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519/comment-page-1#comment-633749</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Roy Garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519#comment-633749</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s time right here/right now.  All programers for bit-torrent clients must come together and figure out a way to properly mask ones IP address and/or scramble all data.  Its NO LONGER an option.  Trackers going private isn&#039;t going to help either, how does one know if one is a &quot;whitelist&quot; person verses a &quot;blacklist&quot; person.  You can&#039;t, no way to know...

all I know is that the time is right, the time for action is needed, it is now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s time right here/right now.  All programers for bit-torrent clients must come together and figure out a way to properly mask ones IP address and/or scramble all data.  Its NO LONGER an option.  Trackers going private isn&#8217;t going to help either, how does one know if one is a &#8220;whitelist&#8221; person verses a &#8220;blacklist&#8221; person.  You can&#8217;t, no way to know&#8230;</p>
<p>all I know is that the time is right, the time for action is needed, it is now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richuk</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519/comment-page-1#comment-632180</link>
		<dc:creator>Richuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519#comment-632180</guid>
		<description>I keep reading reports on The Reg and BBC news that some guy from the government wants to do the next &#039;big&#039; thing to stamp out file-sharing and disconnect users who do it. IMO, those who suggest this must know as much about the Internet as I do about flower arranging (basically nothing). Also aggravating is hearing about &#039;educating&#039; users that what they&#039;re doing is wrong.

Nearly as horrifically amusing as the BBC article earlier this year about some minister &#039;suggesting&#039; proposals in the near future that *might* make copying a CD to a computer legal. I sometimes wonder how anyone in the government can turn their computer on in the morning if they&#039;re that technologically unaware.

I have a small weep every time I hear anyone in authority say the words &#039;copyright&#039; and &#039;infringement&#039; in the same sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep reading reports on The Reg and BBC news that some guy from the government wants to do the next &#8216;big&#8217; thing to stamp out file-sharing and disconnect users who do it. IMO, those who suggest this must know as much about the Internet as I do about flower arranging (basically nothing). Also aggravating is hearing about &#8216;educating&#8217; users that what they&#8217;re doing is wrong.</p>
<p>Nearly as horrifically amusing as the BBC article earlier this year about some minister &#8217;suggesting&#8217; proposals in the near future that *might* make copying a CD to a computer legal. I sometimes wonder how anyone in the government can turn their computer on in the morning if they&#8217;re that technologically unaware.</p>
<p>I have a small weep every time I hear anyone in authority say the words &#8216;copyright&#8217; and &#8216;infringement&#8217; in the same sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hippie</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519/comment-page-1#comment-630300</link>
		<dc:creator>Hippie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519#comment-630300</guid>
		<description>&quot; Maybe in Britain this could make sense, but in the US it wouldn’t. &quot;

 Already happening here.
 Those lawsuits aren&#039;t throwing up any red flags at all.
 Nothing is going to throw up a red flag if the US media DOES NOT REPORT IT TRUTHFULLY.
 It doesn&#039;t.

 &quot; The “pay us or else you can’t hear or disseminate the free speech you’d like to” probably would throw up all kinds of red flags in the US. Or at least I like to think it would. &quot;

 That&#039;s becuase it&#039;s being masked as a crusade against piracy to &#039;protect the artist&#039; .
 When people recognize that as bullshit, it becomes a crusade against &#039;kiddie porn&#039;.
 No one wants to look like they support that, right ?
 
 The US media is marketing such control in a way that no one notices.

 In the US we are very used to losing rights as well.. some of them we won&#039;t notice till its to late.

 It&#039;s very nearly too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Maybe in Britain this could make sense, but in the US it wouldn’t. &#8221;</p>
<p> Already happening here.<br />
 Those lawsuits aren&#8217;t throwing up any red flags at all.<br />
 Nothing is going to throw up a red flag if the US media DOES NOT REPORT IT TRUTHFULLY.<br />
 It doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p> &#8221; The “pay us or else you can’t hear or disseminate the free speech you’d like to” probably would throw up all kinds of red flags in the US. Or at least I like to think it would. &#8221;</p>
<p> That&#8217;s becuase it&#8217;s being masked as a crusade against piracy to &#8216;protect the artist&#8217; .<br />
 When people recognize that as bullshit, it becomes a crusade against &#8216;kiddie porn&#8217;.<br />
 No one wants to look like they support that, right ?</p>
<p> The US media is marketing such control in a way that no one notices.</p>
<p> In the US we are very used to losing rights as well.. some of them we won&#8217;t notice till its to late.</p>
<p> It&#8217;s very nearly too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519/comment-page-1#comment-630030</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519#comment-630030</guid>
		<description>Maybe in Britain this could make sense, but in the US it wouldn&#039;t. Not to knock Britain, but as the article says, they are used to paying to listen to radio. But in the US we have no such requirements, and logically, what is the difference between sharing and recording from the radio ? If you really want the best recording just plug the output jacks into a computer or DVD recorder. Near perfect results.
Plus, with the rapid forsaking of print newspapers for the electronic media of the web, this could probably be seen as a freedom of speech and info issue in the US. The &quot;pay us or else you can&#039;t hear or disseminate the free speech you&#039;d like to&quot; probably would throw up all kinds of red flags in the US. Or at least I like to think it would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe in Britain this could make sense, but in the US it wouldn&#8217;t. Not to knock Britain, but as the article says, they are used to paying to listen to radio. But in the US we have no such requirements, and logically, what is the difference between sharing and recording from the radio ? If you really want the best recording just plug the output jacks into a computer or DVD recorder. Near perfect results.<br />
Plus, with the rapid forsaking of print newspapers for the electronic media of the web, this could probably be seen as a freedom of speech and info issue in the US. The &#8220;pay us or else you can&#8217;t hear or disseminate the free speech you&#8217;d like to&#8221; probably would throw up all kinds of red flags in the US. Or at least I like to think it would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hippie</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519/comment-page-1#comment-629720</link>
		<dc:creator>Hippie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519#comment-629720</guid>
		<description>&quot; But this is about control, nothing else.  &quot;

 Absolutely.
 Time and time again, numbers like the ones for this film prove that internet access to
 &#039;previews&#039; of these films make NO difference.
 The Harvard/Yale study proved that downloading has NO EFFECT on sales.

 The &#039;piracy&#039; crap is just a smokescreen to insure that all artists, if they want to have anything more
 than a limited local presence, MUST go through the labels as gatekeepers. This is even to the point
 where harware manufacturers are pressured to cripple features that could allow someone to use their
 PC as a home recording studio, ( the dell disabled stereo mix, attempts to plug analog access on pc&#039;s .. etc.. )

 They urgently need to bring the internet ... a potential GLOBAL distribution system, under their control.
 The government helps them, not only because of bribes, but because they too have a vested interest in
 controlling information. Just look at the part the internet played in the US primaries.
 Politicians need this door closed, and they&#039;ll use whatever rallying cry is convenient.
 The fact that the cartels will pay them for it as well is icing on the cake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; But this is about control, nothing else.  &#8221;</p>
<p> Absolutely.<br />
 Time and time again, numbers like the ones for this film prove that internet access to<br />
 &#8216;previews&#8217; of these films make NO difference.<br />
 The Harvard/Yale study proved that downloading has NO EFFECT on sales.</p>
<p> The &#8216;piracy&#8217; crap is just a smokescreen to insure that all artists, if they want to have anything more<br />
 than a limited local presence, MUST go through the labels as gatekeepers. This is even to the point<br />
 where harware manufacturers are pressured to cripple features that could allow someone to use their<br />
 PC as a home recording studio, ( the dell disabled stereo mix, attempts to plug analog access on pc&#8217;s .. etc.. )</p>
<p> They urgently need to bring the internet &#8230; a potential GLOBAL distribution system, under their control.<br />
 The government helps them, not only because of bribes, but because they too have a vested interest in<br />
 controlling information. Just look at the part the internet played in the US primaries.<br />
 Politicians need this door closed, and they&#8217;ll use whatever rallying cry is convenient.<br />
 The fact that the cartels will pay them for it as well is icing on the cake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519/comment-page-1#comment-629403</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519#comment-629403</guid>
		<description>@ A bit pissed are we?

Nope. I&#039;m &lt;I&gt;very&lt;/I&gt; pissed.

It wouldn&#039;t take much to put things right -- a little goodwill on the part of the labels and studios and a willingness to treat their customers as reasonable people who&#039;ll behave reasonably if they&#039;re given half a chance. 

But this is about control, nothing else. And the cartels have made it plain they&#039;ll settle for nothing less.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ A bit pissed are we?</p>
<p>Nope. I&#8217;m <i>very</i> pissed.</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t take much to put things right &#8212; a little goodwill on the part of the labels and studios and a willingness to treat their customers as reasonable people who&#8217;ll behave reasonably if they&#8217;re given half a chance. </p>
<p>But this is about control, nothing else. And the cartels have made it plain they&#8217;ll settle for nothing less.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comeoncomcast</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519/comment-page-1#comment-629371</link>
		<dc:creator>Comeoncomcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519#comment-629371</guid>
		<description>Ahh, The Dark Knight will probably one of the films of the year to make $200 Million dollars

...and the Charity Government Tax that they give them and all the lawsuits

Suffering? Oh Please

Sad, Much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, The Dark Knight will probably one of the films of the year to make $200 Million dollars</p>
<p>&#8230;and the Charity Government Tax that they give them and all the lawsuits</p>
<p>Suffering? Oh Please</p>
<p>Sad, Much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519/comment-page-1#comment-629364</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16519#comment-629364</guid>
		<description>A bit pissed are we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit pissed are we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
