<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $12 computer &#8212; on the way!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16615/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16615</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gr33n3gg</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16615/comment-page-1#comment-675154</link>
		<dc:creator>Gr33n3gg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16615#comment-675154</guid>
		<description>Nah, its built on the NES. http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/06/1925225
Great article though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, its built on the NES. <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/06/1925225" rel="nofollow">http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/06/1925225</a><br />
Great article though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Venegas</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16615/comment-page-1#comment-673296</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Venegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16615#comment-673296</guid>
		<description>RECYCLING

There is no way a computer can be made at such a low cost.
Besides, who is going to tool up to make an obsolete processor and set of support chips?

The lowest possible computer is a donated and re-manufactured by volunteers and students using donated funds for expenses.
Perhaps then the can give away the computers for at least $50.

There are many old computers, monitors, disk drives, etc. out there that are no longer used by individuals and firms because they are obsolete for advanced and power users but could work fine in some poor neighborhood or country. Re-cycling by is the green way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RECYCLING</p>
<p>There is no way a computer can be made at such a low cost.<br />
Besides, who is going to tool up to make an obsolete processor and set of support chips?</p>
<p>The lowest possible computer is a donated and re-manufactured by volunteers and students using donated funds for expenses.<br />
Perhaps then the can give away the computers for at least $50.</p>
<p>There are many old computers, monitors, disk drives, etc. out there that are no longer used by individuals and firms because they are obsolete for advanced and power users but could work fine in some poor neighborhood or country. Re-cycling by is the green way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16615/comment-page-1#comment-671712</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 22:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16615#comment-671712</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen used but working Apple IIs on sale at thrift shops and worse (you don&#039;t want to know the kind of places I frequent) for anywhere from $5 to $20.

I threw mine out.

The last &quot;upgrade&quot; to the II line was the IIgs, which was a new and (even then) slow 16-bit chip that emulated the old 8-bit architecture, and did a poor job of it.

No further upgrades to it is one major reason the PC-based architecture took over and became the most common hardware in use today. (Another reason involved IBM not prosecuting makers of clone machines.)

More power to them, but the entire venture is not going to accomplish anything remotely intended. The &quot;Computers for everyone&quot; projects have been doomed from the start.

What kind of CPU are we talking about here? An 8-bit one like the 6502 has nowhere near the computing power needed to run powerful enough applications, no matter what kind of programming wizardry they use. I was an Apple II programmer and couldn&#039;t make the kind of interfaces modern computing needs (which is why I had to make the switch in the 1990s!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen used but working Apple IIs on sale at thrift shops and worse (you don&#8217;t want to know the kind of places I frequent) for anywhere from $5 to $20.</p>
<p>I threw mine out.</p>
<p>The last &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to the II line was the IIgs, which was a new and (even then) slow 16-bit chip that emulated the old 8-bit architecture, and did a poor job of it.</p>
<p>No further upgrades to it is one major reason the PC-based architecture took over and became the most common hardware in use today. (Another reason involved IBM not prosecuting makers of clone machines.)</p>
<p>More power to them, but the entire venture is not going to accomplish anything remotely intended. The &#8220;Computers for everyone&#8221; projects have been doomed from the start.</p>
<p>What kind of CPU are we talking about here? An 8-bit one like the 6502 has nowhere near the computing power needed to run powerful enough applications, no matter what kind of programming wizardry they use. I was an Apple II programmer and couldn&#8217;t make the kind of interfaces modern computing needs (which is why I had to make the switch in the 1990s!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


