<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google page ranking and Schröedinger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16653/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16653</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:08:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dda</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16653/comment-page-1#comment-680137</link>
		<dc:creator>dda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16653#comment-680137</guid>
		<description>hey, certainly it&#039;s not dying. Quantum mechanics describes too many important things. For example tunneling.  Without this effect no transistors would work and in particular microprocessors would not exist. So you would not have an ability to post your message at all. 
BTW, if you have another good theory to replace quantum mechanics, that will describe all the effects and suggest new ones, feel free to publish it and get Nobel prize (or two)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, certainly it&#8217;s not dying. Quantum mechanics describes too many important things. For example tunneling.  Without this effect no transistors would work and in particular microprocessors would not exist. So you would not have an ability to post your message at all.<br />
BTW, if you have another good theory to replace quantum mechanics, that will describe all the effects and suggest new ones, feel free to publish it and get Nobel prize (or two)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16653/comment-page-1#comment-677368</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 23:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16653#comment-677368</guid>
		<description>someone care to translate that into something a NORMAL geek can understand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someone care to translate that into something a NORMAL geek can understand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16653/comment-page-1#comment-676759</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16653#comment-676759</guid>
		<description>Since quantum mechanics is dying of it deserved death I don&#039;t see the point for still using the Schröedinger equation on anything except for fun. 

The problem with quantum mechanic is the uncertainty principle that turn every equation into rubber. 

This flexibility is extremely small indeed but is enough to make the theory fit any BS you can through at it. 


The quantum mechanic advocate has made the universe fuzzy at a very very small scale, at a scale so small in fact that we can not prove it or unprove it for the time being because it require an energy scale we can not probe yet.

How convenient!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since quantum mechanics is dying of it deserved death I don&#8217;t see the point for still using the Schröedinger equation on anything except for fun. </p>
<p>The problem with quantum mechanic is the uncertainty principle that turn every equation into rubber. </p>
<p>This flexibility is extremely small indeed but is enough to make the theory fit any BS you can through at it. </p>
<p>The quantum mechanic advocate has made the universe fuzzy at a very very small scale, at a scale so small in fact that we can not prove it or unprove it for the time being because it require an energy scale we can not probe yet.</p>
<p>How convenient!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
