Comments on: ‘Innocent infringer’ defense in RIAA cases

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:32:10 +0000

This innocent infringer reminds me of one of the early suits where the victum bought into one of those “download all the music you want for a low fee” pages (you pay, they give you kazza ect.). Got caught, claimed she had perchased leggaly, and like above they had no mercy.

It is so easy to create a legal looking page now a days.
I’m waiting for the Itunes clone lawsuit.

By: A_F

A_F — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:21:45 +0000

Thanks Ray that you arranged with Jon to put the “disclaimer” in front of the reprint.

Reading for example what Judge Xavier R. wrote about the complaining of defendant(s) about the affidavid of Dr. J. not being a “competent” one;

It reads as if defendant got something wrong from reading your experts report about Dr J.’s work in Lindor and confused the competence of his work with given some competent testimonies/affidavits or any other kind of paperwork where competence is measured not in the “intelligence or correctness” of the person, but only in formal stuff like having the stuff sworn under penalty of perjury or some other kind of purly FORMAL stuff.

By: chronoss

chronoss — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:08:59 +0000

and when the new copyright law comes to canada , the new anti circumvention aspect will get me over 200,000 in fines for MATERIAL NOT EVEN COPYRIGHTED, all cause the format was ripped from a dvdr.

NICE:
CAN YOU SAY:section 12 charter violation:CRUEL and UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT