Comments on: Napster accumulated deficit of $199 million http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16705 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Wendy http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16705/comment-page-1#comment-803915 Wendy Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:31:26 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16705#comment-803915 NAPSTER SERVICE IS SOOO DISHONEST!!. I went on naptster to purchase a few songs and they used my credit card info to sign me up for a “free trial” which I didn’t know I was signed up for until 3 months later! - I told them that I didn’t want the membership and to refund me but they wouldn’t do it . Extremely dishonest people. NAPSTER SERVICE IS SOOO DISHONEST!!. I went on naptster to purchase a few songs and they used my credit card info to sign me up for a “free trial” which I didn’t know I was signed up for until 3 months later! – I told them that I didn’t want the membership and to refund me but they wouldn’t do it . Extremely dishonest people.

]]> By: Free Thinker http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16705/comment-page-1#comment-690235 Free Thinker Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:12:52 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16705#comment-690235 Jon, unfortunately, I'm not sure that these losses mean much when it comes to Crapster. They are the RIAA corporate icon of what a legal filesharing outfit is supposed to be, so they'll just keep this corporate corpse alive for as long as it takes, forcing it down the throats of universities and schools. I hope I'm wrong. What do you think? Jon, unfortunately, I’m not sure that these losses mean much when it comes to Crapster.

They are the RIAA corporate icon of what a legal filesharing outfit is supposed to be, so they’ll just keep this corporate corpse alive for as long as it takes, forcing it down the throats of universities and schools.

I hope I’m wrong. What do you think?

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16705/comment-page-1#comment-689062 Reader's Write Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:50:36 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16705#comment-689062 well, if napster II just had done what allofmp3 was doing (selling music instead of renting DRMinfected crapware with soundfilling inside) then they could have been successful, But as one of those label bosses back some time admitted publicly they "had no clue" and everybody would have been able to sell them anything. And exactly that happend! Anybody sold them anything and this idiots were just so stupid to buy from the guys that were no musiclovers but vendors for a technology that can and will not work and therefor keeps those vendors in a business relationship with those "no clue havers" for updating the DRM sheme that they sold them instead of a business modell like the russians used. well, if napster II just had done what allofmp3 was doing (selling music instead of renting DRMinfected crapware with soundfilling inside) then they could have been successful,
But as one of those label bosses back some time admitted publicly they “had no clue” and everybody would have been able to sell them anything.
And exactly that happend! Anybody sold them anything and this idiots were just so stupid to buy from the guys that were no musiclovers but vendors for a technology that can and will not work and therefor keeps those vendors in a business relationship with those “no clue havers” for updating the DRM sheme that they sold them instead of a business modell like the russians used.

]]>