Comments on: Users dragged into Echostar, Freetech row http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16772 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: RE:anonymouse Says http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16772/comment-page-1#comment-735312 RE:anonymouse Says Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:19:42 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16772#comment-735312 I personnaly know of a user who bought a Coolsat Free to air and is using it to watch free dish network his name is Edward xxxxxx and he lives at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,ohio but I doubt if echostar will do anything about him. Thats about as low as you can go? Ehy not grow a backbone and face that guy in Person and settle whatever it is that made you post this. I personnaly know of a user who bought a Coolsat Free to air and is using it to watch free dish network
his name is Edward xxxxxx and he lives at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,ohio
but I doubt if echostar will do anything about him.

Thats about as low as you can go? Ehy not grow a backbone and face that guy in Person and settle whatever it is that made you post this.

]]> By: anonymouse http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16772/comment-page-1#comment-726315 anonymouse Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:24:08 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16772#comment-726315 I personnaly know of a user who bought a Coolsat Free to air and is using it to watch free dish network his name is Edward napier and he lives at 13088 baumhart road in amherst,ohio but I doubt if echostar will do anything about him. I personnaly know of a user who bought a Coolsat Free to air and is using it to watch free dish network
his name is Edward napier and he lives at 13088 baumhart road in amherst,ohio
but I doubt if echostar will do anything about him.

]]> By: ... http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16772/comment-page-1#comment-712112 ... Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:32:09 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16772#comment-712112 Hey, didn't the Supreme Court in a fairly recent case against one of the peer-to-peer software creators say that if a device (or software) has significant non-infringing uses, the user can not be held liable for contributory infringement just because the item *could* be used to infringe copyrights? I forget which one, but it was an important declaration, and gave rise to the t-shirt motto (I have one) of "Source Code == Free Speech". Hmm, on second thought I think the t-shirt saying was coined from the Napster declaration that source code is defined as being a derivative creative work. Or something like that. Hey, didn’t the Supreme Court in a fairly recent case against one of the peer-to-peer software creators say that if a device (or software) has significant non-infringing uses, the user can not be held liable for contributory infringement just because the item *could* be used to infringe copyrights? I forget which one, but it was an important declaration, and gave rise to the t-shirt motto (I have one) of “Source Code == Free Speech”. Hmm, on second thought I think the t-shirt saying was coined from the Napster declaration that source code is defined as being a derivative creative work. Or something like that.

]]>