(Googling the girl’s name only returned a child actress, a photographer, and a belly dancer.)

The RIAA are scum, and the comic books are only brainwashing bullshit to try to attack the prosecutors out of court, which is what the RIAA have always done.

The problem is the comic books use the names and events of currently active court cases, and they draw a conclusion without evidence, so as to humiliate the individuals in the court case. They also put a conclusion on the court cases; when no

conclusion has been reached yet.

The distinction between what is and what isn’t meant to accurately reflect reality is not communicated. The choice of real-world issues blurs that distinction to the point that there isn’t one.

Not to mention the moral high horse on which the first issue ends.

I’ll defend the NCSC and Lorri. But not these comics. They need to stop doing them. They don’t have the expertise to do the correctly.

Dear tap worm I am sorry for using a wormkiller on you, and for all the damage my immune system did on your hugly skin of parasites, NOT!

See, LM is a very nice person! Believe me now, thank me later.

Nice update, too. I hadn’t heard about the latest installment.

Again, the point isn’t the case type/issue, the real story is supposed to be how the courts work. There have been many ‘how courts work” books published but nobody ever reads them because they are boring and sometimes a bit out of context.