<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian porn channel: Art? Or what?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16837/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16837</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:56:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rekrul</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16837/comment-page-1#comment-736193</link>
		<dc:creator>Rekrul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16837#comment-736193</guid>
		<description>&quot;But. says an OpEd in the Calgary Herald, the porn channel is, “an abomination,” and “When I read your news article on the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission’s (CRTC) decision to licence a pornography channel, my first thought was ‘What good are they?’ (The CRTC, that is),” posted Peggy Lynn Kelly in the Ottawa Citizen.&quot;

Another uptight prude who&#039;s not getting enough...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But. says an OpEd in the Calgary Herald, the porn channel is, “an abomination,” and “When I read your news article on the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission’s (CRTC) decision to licence a pornography channel, my first thought was ‘What good are they?’ (The CRTC, that is),” posted Peggy Lynn Kelly in the Ottawa Citizen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another uptight prude who&#8217;s not getting enough&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
