Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Interesting look at RIAA v Jeffrey Howell

p2pnet news view | RIAA News:- Yesterday, we posted an item saying a judge found Jeffrey Howell, who’d kept about 2,000 music recordings on his PC, guilty of, “willfully and intentionally” destroying evidence of his alleged P2P activities, “after being notified of pending legal action by the RIAA”.

Did he in fact try to scrub his hard drive?And if he did, was it necessarily for nefarious purposes? Or was it because he’d simply had enough and wanted Kazaa  and everything to do with it off his system?

Only he really knows, but meanwhile, p2pnet reader Rekrul has an interesting take.

“I don’t know the details of what happened (probably nobody except the tech experts do), but I’d like to make a guess,” he says, going on »»»

 He uninstalled Kazaa, but didn’t clean the registry so there were still traces of it. Also, if it’s like most Windows software, it probably left directories and files all over the place.

Any reformat he did was probably a ‘quick’ format that simply wipes the FAT and directory info, but leaves all the data.

If he’d zero-filled the drive, the data would have been *GONE*, and it would take a hugely expensive piece of equipment and the complete disassembly of his drive to get anything back.

Downloading a file shredding program and nuking the logs wouldn’t be necessary after a true format of the drive, which is pretty much proof that he didn’t know what he was doing. Even if the order is listed wrong, he probably had no real idea how to remove all traces of something from his system, which is probably why he got caught.

Windows is notorious for leaving scraps of information all over the place.”

It’s, “almost like a scavenger hunt to try and find every location that Windows has squirrelled away information on what the computer has been doing,” adds Rekrul.

JN

Add to Technorati Favorites



Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe
to p2pnet.net
| | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.

HOME

7 Responses to “Interesting look at RIAA v Jeffrey Howell”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    So, what’s the point?
    A murderer wipes out the fingerprints but forgets about one on the weapon…

    “Your Honor, my client did not know what he was doing, otherwise he wouldn’t have been caught. On that fact alone he should be found not guilty.”

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    Cool! soon ppl in usa will be hang on trees for turning on computer and connecting it to internet!!

  3. Mike Ox-Small Says:

    Just move your computer somewhere else, get another one with no music on it, “Here it is, search all ye want!” RIAA, FBI, Pigs, come and get me!!

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    “So, what’s the point?”

    Each time I hear an RIAA paid troll open their pipe hole I charge them with a message to their masters:

    1) Troll! Tell your master of evil that we will never but I mean never ever buy anything froim them!

    But I mean NEVER!

    2) Also we just hired a company of exterminators to come and spray your rat hole with pest killer.

    Start running now like the cook-roaches you are!

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    Howell wasn’t restricted to do with his OWN PC whatever he wants to do. It’s a little bit odd they charge him certain operations not prohibited by laws.

  6. Jeff Says:

    Fat chance collecting on your $40,850 judgement, RIAA. Given
    this guy has no money, he’ll probably declare bankruptcy. So
    your chances of getting any money out of him are about equal
    to that of squeezing blood out of a turnip.

  7. Reader's Write Says:

    He is guilty by default (no evidence is needed), and his hard drive suppose to proof he is innocent…
    Good job judge! Justice upside down.

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®