Comments on: Interesting look at RIAA v Jeffrey Howell

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:35:09 +0000

He is guilty by default (no evidence is needed), and his hard drive suppose to proof he is innocent…
Good job judge! Justice upside down.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:19:21 +0000

Fat chance collecting on your $40,850 judgement, RIAA. Given
this guy has no money, he’ll probably declare bankruptcy. So
your chances of getting any money out of him are about equal
to that of squeezing blood out of a turnip.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:14:05 +0000

Howell wasn’t restricted to do with his OWN PC whatever he wants to do. It’s a little bit odd they charge him certain operations not prohibited by laws.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:00:38 +0000

“So, what’s the point?”

Each time I hear an RIAA paid troll open their pipe hole I charge them with a message to their masters:

1) Troll! Tell your master of evil that we will never but I mean never ever buy anything froim them!

But I mean NEVER!

2) Also we just hired a company of exterminators to come and spray your rat hole with pest killer.

Start running now like the cook-roaches you are!

By: Mike Ox-Small

Mike Ox-Small — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:30:23 +0000

Just move your computer somewhere else, get another one with no music on it, “Here it is, search all ye want!” RIAA, FBI, Pigs, come and get me!!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:05:18 +0000

Cool! soon ppl in usa will be hang on trees for turning on computer and connecting it to internet!!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:59:59 +0000

So, what’s the point?
A murderer wipes out the fingerprints but forgets about one on the weapon…

“Your Honor, my client did not know what he was doing, otherwise he wouldn’t have been caught. On that fact alone he should be found not guilty.”