Comments on: Looking for a lawyer: p2pnet v McAfee http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: an Arse http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866/comment-page-1#comment-749411 an Arse Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:17:37 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866#comment-749411 Hell, if money is the only thing to worry about. Jon could set up a donation fund, where readers can donate money to help him fight legal suits against various corrupt companies. The crap that M$ and various other companies have done over the years definitely needs to be challenged in court. Only reason nobody ever stands up against them is due to lack of money and time. Pooling money together will solve the money issue, but the time issue still remains. Nevertheless, McAfee needs to pay for what they've done. Hell, if money is the only thing to worry about. Jon could set up a donation fund, where readers can donate money to help him fight legal suits against various corrupt companies. The crap that M$ and various other companies have done over the years definitely needs to be challenged in court. Only reason nobody ever stands up against them is due to lack of money and time. Pooling money together will solve the money issue, but the time issue still remains. Nevertheless, McAfee needs to pay for what they’ve done.

]]> By: few bux http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866/comment-page-1#comment-747405 few bux Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:16:59 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866#comment-747405 @Reasonable Person "His logic appears flawless.." HER ty. :p @Reasonable Person
“His logic appears flawless..”

HER

ty.
:p

]]> By: Reasonable Person http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866/comment-page-1#comment-745431 Reasonable Person Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:59:24 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866#comment-745431 I have to agree with few bux. His logic appears flawless in my eyes and if I were Jon I would pursue this to see where it leads. What McAfee is doing is clearly wrong. Ideally, wrong doing should always be corrected at the earliest opportune moment, otherwise it will just continue. Leave it too long and they might be able use that against you in a future argument, kind of like how trademark can be lost of not vigilantly protected at all times. I have to agree with few bux. His logic appears flawless in my eyes and if I were Jon I would pursue this to see where it leads. What McAfee is doing is clearly wrong. Ideally, wrong doing should always be corrected at the earliest opportune moment, otherwise it will just continue. Leave it too long and they might be able use that against you in a future argument, kind of like how trademark can be lost of not vigilantly protected at all times.

]]> By: few bux http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866/comment-page-1#comment-744943 few bux Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:02:44 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866#comment-744943 I don't see why it shouldn't happen Slander defamation loss of readership loss of ad revenue users telling people p2pnet is a crooked site with crooked adware malicious intent after Jon even brought this to their attention a while ago Mcaffee should be made to pay for INTENTIONALY doing this. I don’t see why it shouldn’t happen

Slander
defamation
loss of readership
loss of ad revenue
users telling people p2pnet is a crooked site with crooked adware
malicious intent after Jon even brought this to their attention a while ago

Mcaffee should be made to pay for INTENTIONALY doing this.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866/comment-page-1#comment-744414 Reader's Write Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:26:23 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866#comment-744414 lol this should definitely make some headlines if it actually happens lol
this should definitely make some headlines if it actually happens

]]> By: lordpake http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866/comment-page-1#comment-744228 lordpake Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:47:18 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866#comment-744228 Out of curiousity, what about the connection between Antispyware(dot)com and C-NetMedia (whose marketing practises may raise a few questions)? As documented by Ben Edelman, as highlighted in SiteAdvisor page about the said domain: http://www.benedelman.org/news/021408-1.html http://www.benedelman.org/spyware/images/cnet/antispyware-tm-021208.png Instead of just blindly bashing a big corporation :) Out of curiousity, what about the connection between Antispyware(dot)com and C-NetMedia (whose marketing practises may raise a few questions)?

As documented by Ben Edelman, as highlighted in SiteAdvisor page about the said domain:
http://www.benedelman.org/news/021408-1.html
http://www.benedelman.org/spyware/images/cnet/antispyware-tm-021208.png

Instead of just blindly bashing a big corporation :)

]]> By: few bux http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866/comment-page-1#comment-743680 few bux Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:19:16 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866#comment-743680 errr "cippic" not ciipic errr puch=push someone give me a speel check! errr “cippic” not ciipic
errr puch=push

someone give me a speel check!

]]> By: few bux http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866/comment-page-1#comment-743678 few bux Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:18:38 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16866#comment-743678 This is a case i wish ciipic would take on to show the bigwigs like mcaffee they can't puch people around. This is a case i wish ciipic would take on to show the bigwigs like mcaffee they can’t puch people around.

]]>