Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

P2P and human evolution

p2pnet news view Freedom | P2P:- Sam I am and Henry Ermich have an interesting and spirited copyright, copywrong, thread going in Sam I Am and the Statute of Anne.

Check it out ;)

Meanwhile, Henry (his real name) suggests Sam I am (obviously not his real name) might want to check out the P2P Foundation, which also has an editable Wiki.

It kicks off with a quote from Buckminster Fuller: “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”

I had a look at the foundation site and thought some of you might be interested as well.

Here’s what it says in the About section »»»

The Foundation for P2P Alternatives proposes to be a meeting place for those who can broadly agree with the following propositions, which are also argued in the essay or book in progress, P2P and Human Evolution:

  • that peer-to-peer based technology reflects a change of consciousness towards participation, and in turn strengthens it

  • that the “distributed network” format, expressed in the specific manner of peer to peer relations, is a new form of political organizing and subjectivity, and an alternative for the current political/economic order, which though it does not offer solutions per se, points the way to a variety of dialogical and self-organizing formats, i.e. it represents different processes for arriving at such solutions; it ushers in a era of ‘nonrepresentational democracy’, where an increasing number of people are able to manage their social and productive life through the use of a variety of autonomous and interdependent networks and peer circles; that global governance, and the global market will be, and will have to be, more influenced by modes of governance involving multistakeholdership

  • that it creates a new public domain, an information commons, which should be protected and extended, especially in the domain of common knowledge creation; and that this domain, where the cost of reproducing knowledge is near zero, requires fundamental changes in the intellectual property regime, as reflected by new forms such as the free software movement; that universal common property regimes, i.e. modes of peer property, such as the General Public Licese and the Creative Commons licenses should be himpromoted and extended

  • that the principles developed by the free software movement, in particular the General Public License, and the general principles behind the open source and open access movements, provides for models that could be used in other areas of social and productive life

  • that it reconnects with the older traditions and attempts for a more cooperative social order, but this time obviates the need for authoritarianism and centralization; it has the potential of showing that the new more egalitarian digital culture, is connected to the older traditions of cooperation of the workers and peasants, and to the search for an engaged and meaningful life as expressed in one’s work, which becomes an expression of individual and collective creativity, rather than as a salaried means of survival

  • that it offers youth a vision of renewal and hope, to create a world that is more in tune with their values; that it creates a new language and discourse in tune with the new historical phase of ‘cognitive capitalism’; P2P is a language which every ‘digital youngster’ can understand. However, ‘peer to peer theory’ addresses itself not just to the network-enabled and to knowledge workers, but to the whole of civil society (the ‘multitudes’), and to whoever agrees that the core of decision-making should be located in civil society, and not in the market or in the state, and that the latters should be the servants of civil society

  • it combines subjectivity (new values), intersubjectivity (new relations), objectivity (an enabling technology) and interobjectivity (new forms of organization) that mutually strengthen each other in a positive feedback loop, and it is clearly on the offensive and growing, but lacking ‘political self-consciousness’. It is this form of awareness that the P2P Foundation wants to promote.Bruton

The foundation Wiki also quotes Margaret Mead, to wit, “never doubt that a small group of committed citizens can change the world”.

JN

 (Cheers, Henry)

Add to Technorati Favorites


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe
to p2pnet.net
| | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.

HOME

8 Responses to “P2P and human evolution”

  1. chronoss Says:

    Just so you know i created a pseudo coded white paper that was very like bittorent that had encryption
    6 months before bram dreamed up or stole the idea.

    Certain things about evolution mean they are natural to happen.

    Sharing is one of them.
    finding ways to help you maximize your bandwidth when you have ISPS that scrape you nickeled and dimed to the bare butt/
    If you have fuel you will invent fire
    if you have fire you WILL invent a vehicle
    etc…..

  2. Graychin Says:

    “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world.” - Margaret Mead.

    The rest of the quote:

    “Indeed - it’s the only thing that ever has.”

  3. Henry Emrich Says:

    Jon:
    Thanks for the kind words.
    Just to let everybody know, I’m no longer participating in that pathetic shadowplay masquerading as “debate” with “Sam” — My failure to unthinkingly support the existing Status Quo makes me — and every other “Intellectual Property Skeptic”, in his view, nothing but damn dirty “anarcho-communists” who should “grow a pair and learn to compete” (presumably by lobbying Government for an ever-wider sphere of coercive monopoly.)

    I’m not “debating” him anymore, because to do so would, quite frankly, be a colossal waste of my time.

    To say the least, my views on this topic have changed quite extensively, in no small part due to your own efforts. Sam evidently believes that I don’t think creators/innovators are “worth protecting”.

    I can only ask: is such “protection” worth things like THIS:
    http://sharealike.org/index.php/2004/06/16/bloomsday-and-copyright-run-amok/

    To my pathetic li’l pea-brain, things like THIS would appear NOT to be “promoting the useful arts and sciences”. In fact, I’m stupid enough to believe that such events actually pose a THREAT to creativity and innovation.

    But hey, what do I know — I’m just a damn dirty Anarcho-communist Hippie. :)

    Cheers, y’all

  4. Henry Emrich Says:

    http://www.mindjack.com/feature/killingfields.html

    Another link for all of you damn dirty anarcho-commies reading this :)
    I’ll only point out the fact that THIS is an instance where an entrepreneur — a BUSINESSMAN — has had his “firm and his life” (supposedly what SammyBoy believes Copy’right’ law protects) smashed to bits. Ain’t life-plus-70 years GRAND?

    To be honest, it’s things like THIS — not “digital piracy” — that are the REAL injustices.

  5. Henry Emrich Says:

    One more link for Y’all (and then I’ll go back to my underground lair and continue to work on my evil anarcho-commie plot to destroy creativity.) :)

    www.willfulinfringement.com/WillfulinfringementFLM.asp

    Watch this documentary. I realize that a goodly chunk of the stuff in this film will be “preaching to the converted”, but — speaking as the damn dirty anarcho-commie Eunuch that “Sam” belives me to be — I can only hope that “he” watches this, and sees what his precious “fundamental human right” to a century-long monopoly is really doing…..

  6. Jon Says:

    What’s your email addie, Henry? p2pnet @ shaw dot ca

    Cheers!

  7. Henry Ermich Says:

    “Shaw.ca?”
    Just ran a Google search on that, and it appears to be a Canadian ISP.
    Sorry if I’m not familiar with the reference, but I take it that they’ve been less than stellar as regards privacy or somesuch?

  8. Henry Emrich Says:

    I think I finally got the reference.
    Is “Shaw.ca” your ISP?
    Clever…..

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
Teksavvy