Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

PickupPal — the bigger story

p2pnet news view Freedom | P2P:- Coach company Trentway-Wagar, based in Peterborough, Ontario, apparently doesn’t think green, said p2pnet recently, going on:

“PickupPal says it was launched online to help people reduce their carbon footprints.

“It’s simple, and it’s all about P2P sharing. With about 15,000 registered users in Ontario and organising some 100 rides a day, the site operates in the same way as off-line carpools. People who are going to the same place share rides, reducing the number of exhaust emitting vehicles on the road, cutting back on dwindling gas reserves and saving money, and all at the same time.”

But, “Notwithstanding the benefits, Trentway-Wagar argues that the service violates the Ontario Public Vehicles Act because it allows drivers to collect money by offering strangers a ride,” as Michael Geist blogs, going on »»»

This is not the first time that the company has targeted ride sharing services.  In 2000, it succeeded in stopping Allo-Stop, then Quebec’s biggest ride sharing company, from operating in Ontario. The PickupPal debate has thus far focused on an outdated provincial law (the government has promised to review the legislation) and the environmental impact of rules that appear to discourage ride sharing.

Yet there is a bigger story here. The law has been rendered out of date because the Internet facilitates new modes of production and organization that enable thousands of people to connect, share, and work together in ways that were previously limited larger, well-organized, and well-funded companies. As scholars such as Yochai Benkler and Clay Shirky have persuasively argued, these modes of production provide great promise.

Ride sharing is an obvious example.  Before the widespread use of the Internet, small scale ride sharing organization was possible, whether through ride boards in schools or announcements at community events.  Those methods hardly posed a threat to established bus services, however.  Once thousands began to connect online at virtually no cost, a parallel, community-created ride sharing service emerged that now challenges established companies for market share.

The same is true in dozens of other sectors. For example, the recent news that an open source advocacy group has sued the Quebec government for failing to consider open source software alternatives in its procurement processes serve as an important reminder of how far open source software has advanced in recent years.  The Linux operating system, the Firefox browser, and the Apache web server have all gobbled growing market share from proprietary software companies by using a different model that uses the Internet for both self-organizing and product distribution.

Many businesses that have relied upon their ability to aggregate and organize as a competitive advantage now find themselves facing similar challenges. Whether it is the remarkable success of Wikipedia as a peer-created online knowledge sharing site, the emergence of Craigslist as a dominant, free classified advertising marketplace, the viability of user-generated content to attract massive audiences, or the use of social networking sites such as Facebook for advocacy purposes, the network economy offers as an “industrial scale” organizing tool at a fraction of the conventional cost.

Businesses that face this new form of competition – competition that effectively comes from their own customers – must adjust or face diminishing market share.  Moreover, attempts to leverage the law to maintain increasingly outdated business models should be rejected.

Indeed, policy makers must recognize that their responsibility involves more than just addressing outdated laws.  Rather, it requires fostering a level playing field for Internet-enabled models and ensuring that our telecommunications networks treat content in a neutral and transparent manner.  In other words, lawmakers must ensure that as the Internet develops, the public is not taken for a ride.

 Michael Geist
[Geist is the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa. He can be reached by email at mgeist[at]uottawa.ca and is on-line at www.michaelgeist.ca.]

Add to Technorati Favorites

p2pnet – Trentway-Wagar goes after PickupPal, August 22, 2008
blogs
– PickupPal Controversy Highlights Power of Networked Economy, September 1, 2008


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!

Subscribe
to p2pnet.net
| | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

HOME

One Response to “PickupPal — the bigger story”

  1. chronoss Says:

    would be nice to get a ride from someone going to my doctor once a month that might actually cost me less.
    BUUUUTTTTT NOOOO greedy bastards have to enter picture and keep another monopoly going while stuffing more CO2 into the atmosphere.

    LIKE YA CHANGE the law then.
    K.I.S.S.

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy