Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

Death knell sounds for Canadian copyright bill

p2pnet news view Politics | P2P:- From the look of it, Canada will next week be in the throes of a(nother) general election and if that’s the case, Bill C-61, Canada’s version of America’s corporate-inspired DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) will die.

And that’s a, “prospect that bitterly disappoints many artists,” says the National Post.

But, “Some critics said it could make criminals out Canadians who wanted to make a backup copy of music, movie or software discs,” says the story, quoting industry minister Jim Prentice as stating:

“The copyright bill is an important piece of legislation. I look forward to getting the bill in front of Parliament when the time comes.”

He’s been looking forward to that for some considerable time but has been repeatedly thwarted by angry Canadians, principally those with Net accounts, who’ve managed to block him at every turn.

Meanwhile, “C-61 may dead but copyright reform Canada is still very much alive,” says Ottawa law professor Michael Geist, going on »»»

Regardless of who forms the next government, copyright will almost certainly be on the agenda. Indeed, Prentice is quoted as saying that he would like to be the Minister that sees it through.

I plan to complete the 61 Reforms to C-61 and C-61 in 61 Seconds projects since these same issues are obviously bound to return when the next copyright bill is introduced.

Second, the election campaign provides an exceptionally important opportunity to speak out on copyright.  Over the past two months, the reaction to C-61 has overwhelmed many politicians.  Some have acknowledged that it was the top issue among constituent correspondence, others have held town hall meetings in response to local concerns, and yet others have sought to make it an election issue.

There are indications of some Conservative MPs expressing some misgivings about the bill.  Several Liberals have articulated their own copyright principles and committed to a public consultation and the NDP has remained the most vocal critic of C-61.

Raising the profile of copyright has required thousands of Canadians to pro-actively contact their elected representatives. Starting next week, those same representatives (and would-be representatives) will be seeking you out.  They will be knocking on doors, making phone calls, attending all-candidates meetings, and generally doing their best to convince voters that they will best represent their interests. I believe that this presents an exceptional opportunity to ask the question - where do you stand on important digital issues such as C-61 and Canadian copyright reform?  Does your local Conservative candidate support the reintroduction of Bill C-61 or would they work toward amendments before it returns?  Is your local Liberal candidate willing to commit to public consultations before the introduction of any new copyright bill?  Is your NDP or Green candidate firmly against the approach in C-61?  These are the questions (along with positions on net neutrality, telecom competition, broadband access, and privacy) that need to be asked again and again and again this fall.  Bill C-61 may be about to die, but the prospect of Canadian DMCA-like legislation remains very much alive.

Add to Technorati Favorites

corporate-inspired DMCA - Bill C-61 Revisited: The Video, September 2, 2008
National Post
- Contentious copyright bill would die with election, September 2, 2008
Michael Geist
- The End of Bill C-61, September 3, 2008


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe
to p2pnet.net
| | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.

HOME

8 Responses to “Death knell sounds for Canadian copyright bill”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    Perhaps we should try pure democracy? our current form of democracy is nothing more than swapping one despotic party for another.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    Jon I love your graphics. Good job.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    “And that’s a, “prospect that bitterly disappoints many artists,” says the National Post.”

    That National Post.
    I recalled another article where the National Post put out a statement about how a certain songwriter said he wanted copyright law toughened to ensure compensation to creators for their work. (ya right)
    Who would even say such a thing if have even been on the Internet for any length of time I wondered.
    So I googled the named songwriter.
    Turned out he was not only the Songwriter… he’s also the President! of the SOCAN Foundation!!
    The National Post forgot to mention that.
    and I found the article:
    http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=253564

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    When reading the article, I noticed the same as above.

    So, write to the newspaper and post it online, because this is not good journalism.

  5. Devil's Advocate Says:

    “…this is not good journalism…”

    That shouldn’t be too surprising - you’re talking about the National Post!
    Sound, responsible journalism isn’t something I’ve been seeing on NP’s site.

  6. Reader's Write Says:

    hurray
    death to the progressive commy’s and Bill C-61

  7. CHRoNoSS Says:

    i will say this again
    WHOM SO EVER SHALL VOTE FOR THIS KIND OF LAW,
    WHOM SO EVER SHALL BRING IT FORTH,

    SHALL SUFFER TILL END OF DAYS.

    remember that if it weren’t for facebookers and faircopyright
    this would have been law before the summer break.

    AND
    id have gotten 6 million in fines for material that has no copyright but was dvdriped
    and then i would have done a section 12 charter challenge

    oh who am i?
    well just look at the past two months how many pre 1960 movies came out of that lovely scene…..
    someone knows i always keep my word.

    Section 12 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Cruel and Unusual Punishment.
    does 6 million in fines sound CRUEL or UNUSAL for stuff that isn’t copyrighted?
    does 1 day per 10$ maximum in jail sound CRUEL or UNUSUAL when the total fine is 6 million?
    ( note average fine fer time = 20$ for each day )

    YOU BET.

    So little word of advice to DION and liberals so far since the bill we’ve seen counterfeit major bust and a few other things the so called industry says need help, listen to your heart and common sense instead of that pocket book for a change.

  8. CHRoNoSS Says:

    oh and just try and threaten ISPS with lawsuits MPAA/RIAA(CRIA) and see what you unleash in canada next.
    Just try lawsuits of any kind on anyone…..

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
Teksavvy