<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is print going the way of the DoDo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16938/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16938</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Henry Emrich</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16938/comment-page-1#comment-766588</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Emrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16938#comment-766588</guid>
		<description>The REAL critical &quot;deal-breaker&quot; on this type of technology is whether the companies producing such units opt for REAL competition -- open, readily-available standards etc. -- or attempt to force some sort of &quot;vendor lock-in&quot;.  That&#039;s what&#039;s pretty much neutered the &quot;E-book&quot; thing up to this point -- companies doing evil, counterproductive bullshit like taking &quot;public domain&quot; literature and attempting to &quot;lock it up&quot; via DRM and &quot;software licenses&quot; etc.

   Doubtless our friend &quot;Sam I am&quot; would find no problem with that, since complaining about such things makes one a &quot;commie anarchist&quot;.  

   Yes, Jon, I AM still rather dismayed by that.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The REAL critical &#8220;deal-breaker&#8221; on this type of technology is whether the companies producing such units opt for REAL competition &#8212; open, readily-available standards etc. &#8212; or attempt to force some sort of &#8220;vendor lock-in&#8221;.  That&#8217;s what&#8217;s pretty much neutered the &#8220;E-book&#8221; thing up to this point &#8212; companies doing evil, counterproductive bullshit like taking &#8220;public domain&#8221; literature and attempting to &#8220;lock it up&#8221; via DRM and &#8220;software licenses&#8221; etc.</p>
<p>   Doubtless our friend &#8220;Sam I am&#8221; would find no problem with that, since complaining about such things makes one a &#8220;commie anarchist&#8221;.  </p>
<p>   Yes, Jon, I AM still rather dismayed by that&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Emrich</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16938/comment-page-1#comment-766580</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Emrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16938#comment-766580</guid>
		<description>The notion that something like this being introduced will cause something like print to &quot;Go away&quot; is just the sort of shortsighted thinking that makes the &quot;technorati&quot; look bad:
   
    There&#039;s a big difference between hardcopies not being used for frivolous crap like daily newspapers and there being NO use for hardcopies at all.  For starters, non-volatile &quot;backups&quot; are going to become increasingly critical over time.  Everybody seems to believe that stuff will just sit &quot;in memory&quot;, but that discounts stuff like EMP, drive failures, etc. 

    To be honest, &quot;newspapers&quot; have been irrelevant since the advent of Television and radio broadcasting -- primarily because all they ever really DID was regurgitate the stuff supplied by the wire services, interspersed with local-flavored human interest &quot;fluff&quot;.

    Sometimes you really &quot;nail&quot; one, but sometimes -- like now -- you really miss bigtime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion that something like this being introduced will cause something like print to &#8220;Go away&#8221; is just the sort of shortsighted thinking that makes the &#8220;technorati&#8221; look bad:</p>
<p>    There&#8217;s a big difference between hardcopies not being used for frivolous crap like daily newspapers and there being NO use for hardcopies at all.  For starters, non-volatile &#8220;backups&#8221; are going to become increasingly critical over time.  Everybody seems to believe that stuff will just sit &#8220;in memory&#8221;, but that discounts stuff like EMP, drive failures, etc. </p>
<p>    To be honest, &#8220;newspapers&#8221; have been irrelevant since the advent of Television and radio broadcasting &#8212; primarily because all they ever really DID was regurgitate the stuff supplied by the wire services, interspersed with local-flavored human interest &#8220;fluff&#8221;.</p>
<p>    Sometimes you really &#8220;nail&#8221; one, but sometimes &#8212; like now &#8212; you really miss bigtime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hahaha</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16938/comment-page-1#comment-766358</link>
		<dc:creator>hahaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16938#comment-766358</guid>
		<description>Print will never go away. It takes a lot less to get rid of electronic data than the printed page. There are books that are hundreds of years old--how old will a file last?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Print will never go away. It takes a lot less to get rid of electronic data than the printed page. There are books that are hundreds of years old&#8211;how old will a file last?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16938/comment-page-1#comment-765937</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/16938#comment-765937</guid>
		<description>I still prefer paper. ebooks need power and power costs a ever increasing amount of money. With paper its got a zero upkeep cost and can be recycled. also power cuts could be a problem if you need wireless to update the display. hard disk falior could also be a problem for those who don&#039;t back up.

on the plus side you can change the font size and some you can even change the font.(harry potter in windings anyone)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still prefer paper. ebooks need power and power costs a ever increasing amount of money. With paper its got a zero upkeep cost and can be recycled. also power cuts could be a problem if you need wireless to update the display. hard disk falior could also be a problem for those who don&#8217;t back up.</p>
<p>on the plus side you can change the font size and some you can even change the font.(harry potter in windings anyone)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


