The power of P2P
p2pnet news view | P2P:- The CBC has a fascinating feature slugged The rise of Facebook activism.
It’s all about how Facebook is changing the world because it allows people to effectively organize online.
“Copyright reform must have seemed an unlikely hot-button issue in the winter of 2007 — that is, until 50 protesters arrived at Industry Minister Jim Prentice’s constituency office in Calgary in December,” says the post, going on
They were there to voice their complaints about the government’s plans to introduce a bill that would, among other changes, allow copyright holders to place digital locks on content, thus preventing copies from being made.
The small protest got a huge boost when, in a matter of days, 20,000 people joined a group protesting the rumoured legislation on the popular social networking website Facebook.
In part because of the opposition, the introduction of the legislation, Bill C-61, was delayed until June.
The group, which now has more than 90,000 members, was the brainchild of University of Ottawa professor Michael Geist, an outspoken critic of both the substance of the bill and what he says is the government’s lack of public consultation on the issue.
After 7,000 new members joined the group within days of the government’s introduction of the bill, Geist said it was the beginning of a new wave of political activism on the internet.
“What we’ve seen over the past 24 hours has been nothing short of remarkable,” he said. “Literally tens of thousands of Canadians are speaking out with an element of shock that the government would introduce this legislation in the manner that it has.”
Geist’s group, “stands as one of the most successful examples of ‘Facebook activism,” tapping into, “the ready-made structure of online social networks to make joining a group as quick as a click of a button,” say sthe story.
It has that right. But Facebook is a commercial enterprise operated solely for profit and although there’s not the slightest question members use it for entirely noncommercial activities —- a fact deeply regretted by its creators —- it would be a mistake to credit it alone with the massive changes which are taking place thanks to the fact people around the world are now able to communicate with each other, completely by-passing the traditional media which until the World Wide Web, were responsible for 99% of everything people heard and saw.
Facebook is only one element of online P2P (people to people) communications. There are other formal and informal social networks and equally powerful, but less visible, are IM, chats, blogs, web sites and even cellphones.
People talking to people. One-on-one, and group-to-group. By whatever means. And they’re what’s making the difference.
Will Facebook survive?
For the first time in history, politicians (and others) have to answer directly to the people who elected them, a reality that’s creating shock-waves which are rocking the Powers that Used To Be to their cores.
It used to be that government or corporate “leaders” could hatch a scheme knowing it’d be a done deal before the public had time to react. But time is no longer on their side. Almost immediately after the latest infamy is announced, the Net is buzzing with the news and minutes later ………
“One way or another, p2p technologies will be the primary backbone for communications in this century,” I said in a discussion with Slyck three years ago.
“Thousands of new people are going online every day meaning for the first time in history, ‘we’ have a voice ‘they’ have to listen to. Look at what’s happening in the entertainment industry, for example. They’re going blue trying to avoid the issues, but they’ll eventually be forced to acknowledge their customers as active participants rather than mindless cash-cows.”
Facebook doesn’t depend on its members. It relies on advertisers who are beginning to learn they’ll have to stop treating the people they’re trying to reach a lot more respect than hitherto.
Will Facebook survive? At the moment, it and others of its ilk are examining Dubbed Engagement Ads, each of which, “encourages users to interact with brands and share that interaction with their friends – without requiring them to visit brands’ profile pages or exit the site”.
Whether Facebook or any of the other commercial social networking sites will still be around in another two or three years remains to be seen. But if they’re not, the Net and P2P are here to stay because Facebook is only just the beginning —- the edge of the envelope.
And there’s another factor that’s rarely, if ever, taken into consideration.
The companies and governments forget the people they’re threatening in various ways are also the ones who are conceiving, developing, servicing and administering the very systems which keep the wheels turning and the money coming in, I said in the Slyck item, adding:
“Think about it. So world corporate community and governments really will soon have to mend their ways.”
And IMHO, what that means is, we, the people, are being recognized as active collaborators instead of cash cows to be cynically exploited at any and every opportunity.
Tip of the iceberg
The CBC has Geist saying online and offline activism play off each other and spawn a more far-reaching kind of protest and, “For that reason, he expects these kinds of protests to grow in popularity.”
It’s, “the tip of the iceberg,” he wrote, says the story, adding:
“I think we will see far more online activism and all organizations â both business and government â working to respond to the online activity.”
And there’s even more to it than that.
The online spokespeople and activists today of today are the government and corporate leaders of tomorrow. And they know only too well the people they’re dealing with are no longer a shapeless mass to be safely kept out of sight and at arm’s length.
Instead, they’re billions upon billions of individual men and, women and children and eventually, they’ll all be online in one way or another.
Then, the shapes of ‘government’ and corporate enterprises will be changed forever.
(Thanks, Luvie)
Jon Newton – p2pnet
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.





September 9th, 2008 at 3:55 pm
http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstnew.htm
Read the pdfs. This book — better even than Lessig’s book “Free culture” — points out what is wrong with IP in all forms. It also points out the flaw in the notion that such coercive monopoly power CAN be put to “good uses”.
The current mess is nothing new. Patents and Copyright have ALWAYS been about supressing competition by means of Government largesse. One must be at least a tad bit suspicious of those who believe that guaranteed coercive monopoly is a “fundamental human right”.
Read the book.
September 9th, 2008 at 10:09 pm
The thing that nobody’s taking into consideration yet is that there IS no divide between “online” and “IRL’ (In Real Life).
The notion of “IRL” is actually really dangerous because it has allowed the “Powers that Were” to pretend that what happened online didn’t impact “the real world”. I wonder if, 500 years ago, people were trying to pawn off a distinction between “In Real Life” and “IPM” (In Printed Matter.)
Martin Luther’s 99 theses were disseminated by means of the printing press. His nascent “heresy” couldn’t be constrained, and it blew the existing sociopolitical and religious hierarchies TO BITS. With the convergence of computer technology, widespread (and increasing) skepticism about existing cultural forms, and a steadily-increasing commitment to various forms of “Civil Disobedience”, there’s literally no way that the lawsuits, harrassment, or misrepresentations will work anymore. This is WAY bigger than “music piracy” — it’s about finally being able to create a world where resistance is NOT futile.
September 10th, 2008 at 11:42 am
Jon, here is what I received from a Facebook group called “I want to hear Elizabeth May in the next televised leader’s debate.”
— cut —
Hello all 4,500 members(!),
Apparently the Green Party offices across Canada are overwhelmed with support. Conversely, if even a fraction of the emails I am forwarded to the NDP offices are actually sent, the NDP offices are also ‘overwhelmed’. This group has become a very powerful message board and the media is watching. You are making an impact on reversing the ‘Consortium’s’ decision to exclude May. Also I am told by the Greens that they have retained a lawyer and filed a complaint with the CRTC. The very latest is that they have a News Conference scheduled tomorrow sometime.
I have attached an article in today’s Glove and Mail written by former Conservative Party Leader and Canada’s 16th Prime Minister. He is not impressed with this decision and has written an article that I consider a must read. See below.
Thank you all for joining the group and inviting others. This group began in the winter when a spring election was possible. It will fold in a matter of weeks – after the debates. I only hope that when I shut it down and email the final email thanking you for your attention and effort in this cross-party objective, we were successful. I also hope that record numbers of Canadians tune in to watch Elizabeth May debate and the voter turnout on the 14th is a record high.
David J. Danyluk
LET ELIZABETH MAY SPEAK
JOE CLARK
From Wednesday’s Globe and Mail
September 10, 2008 at 12:44 AM EDT
— end —
Article was attached, but I will put a link instead:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080910.COCLARK10/TPStory/TPComment/Television/
September 10th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
Here it comes
‘The people have spoken’
Giest is right, The internet is only really coming into play now… Imagine all the Corey Worthingtons of the world in just 5 years time
September 10th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
To see the power of online association one can see how anonymous is truncing into pieces the business of scientology.
It is true that since Scientology is based on deceptions crimes and extotions it is very vunerable to the light.
Still it is a pretty good demo. Scientology have to stop their criminals and extortion practice or die. I dont’ think they will stop because they make way too much money. So they will die.
September 30th, 2008 at 11:09 am
look at 4chan and anonymous, hacktivists banding together