Comments on: Who needs Bell Canada? Or Comcast?

By: Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:19:18 +0000

From RW’s link:
“Members of Q6/17 have declined to release key documents, and meetings are closed to the public.”

What else is new, eh?
Isn’t that “the Standard” on everything these days?!

George Orwell’s shoutin’ from the grave… “What did I tell ya, huh?!”

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:20:43 +0000

It’s about time to do it.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10040152-38.html

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:10:16 +0000

To that should be added a mesh of point-to-point wireless links.

Bell won’t interfere with those, because they are highly directional.

By: Devil's Advocate

Devil's Advocate — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:34:55 +0000

Should the expansion of this idea become reality, I wonder how long would it take Bell to start a legal campaign against city governments (for “subsidizing and allowing the formation of an anti-competitive venture” to cut into their profits). Ya know something like that will come out of it.

Either that, or Bell will start building “more wireless transmission points” that actually interfere with FreeWAN.

Sticking it to Bell, though… hmmm… I could live with that!
: )

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:48:55 +0000

Ther is allready some software to build network via WIFi cards.

In theory this type of network could go arround the word and be basically undestructable and unstollable.

May be it is time to leave the corporate thieves alone on the internet we builded but that they stold from us.

Let’s start our world wide wifi network.

Bye bye WWW Hello WWWi!

They will not be able to rob it or destroy it this time!