<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Microsoft anti-Apple ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:39:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055/comment-page-1#comment-979951</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 02:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055#comment-979951</guid>
		<description>i like the new ad&#039;s they are great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the new ad&#8217;s they are great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnnyg0</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055/comment-page-1#comment-793982</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnnyg0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 11:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055#comment-793982</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say its more of a &quot;pro PC&quot; ad than an &quot;anti apple&quot; ad. Apple has been making the negative ads all along (and alone as well). I&#039;ve never seen any corporation ridicule another corporation like this in publicity before. Good for apple? Not so sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say its more of a &#8220;pro PC&#8221; ad than an &#8220;anti apple&#8221; ad. Apple has been making the negative ads all along (and alone as well). I&#8217;ve never seen any corporation ridicule another corporation like this in publicity before. Good for apple? Not so sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f4te</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055/comment-page-1#comment-791204</link>
		<dc:creator>f4te</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 04:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055#comment-791204</guid>
		<description>ms is dropping ie?! after 8 or what?
10 bucks says they buy out opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ms is dropping ie?! after 8 or what?<br />
10 bucks says they buy out opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055/comment-page-1#comment-789940</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055#comment-789940</guid>
		<description>Beside the mac is just a PC with basically the same hardware as any Widow machine. Only the Bios differ.
This is so true that you can hack OS X to run on a PC while the MAC can run Windows just fine.

As far as hardware is concern I am not dying for the Apple desktop systems but I must say that the laptops are little marvels of design and quality matched only by Lenovo right now. Also the OSX socket (just like the Linux sockets) is vastly superior to the window soxket and Safari is way better than IE. Microsoft are planning to drop IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beside the mac is just a PC with basically the same hardware as any Widow machine. Only the Bios differ.<br />
This is so true that you can hack OS X to run on a PC while the MAC can run Windows just fine.</p>
<p>As far as hardware is concern I am not dying for the Apple desktop systems but I must say that the laptops are little marvels of design and quality matched only by Lenovo right now. Also the OSX socket (just like the Linux sockets) is vastly superior to the window soxket and Safari is way better than IE. Microsoft are planning to drop IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f4te</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055/comment-page-1#comment-788666</link>
		<dc:creator>f4te</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 04:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055#comment-788666</guid>
		<description>hahaha at the last 2 posts
i like this new ad
i found the second in the gates and seinfeild series QUITE funny, but this one is really good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha at the last 2 posts<br />
i like this new ad<br />
i found the second in the gates and seinfeild series QUITE funny, but this one is really good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055/comment-page-1#comment-788276</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055#comment-788276</guid>
		<description>^^ Good one, Rekrul. And it’d probably work.

But it wouldn&#039;t be used.

It didn’t take (at a minimum) a creative director, graphic artist, story board artist, copyrighter (billable) and seven brainstorming sessions over lunch (billable) to come up with nine ‘concepts’ (billable), three focus groups (billable), four rough takes (billable), the final screening (billable), the final shoot (billable), and 13 high level executive media briefing lunches (billable) and then the final media lunch where it’s presented, with freebies, to low level media hacks (billable).

I’m just making it up, but it’d be something along those lines — if not worse. ;)

Final cost? $2.9 milllion.

Cheers!


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^ Good one, Rekrul. And it’d probably work.</p>
<p>But it wouldn&#8217;t be used.</p>
<p>It didn’t take (at a minimum) a creative director, graphic artist, story board artist, copyrighter (billable) and seven brainstorming sessions over lunch (billable) to come up with nine ‘concepts’ (billable), three focus groups (billable), four rough takes (billable), the final screening (billable), the final shoot (billable), and 13 high level executive media briefing lunches (billable) and then the final media lunch where it’s presented, with freebies, to low level media hacks (billable).</p>
<p>I’m just making it up, but it’d be something along those lines — if not worse. <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Final cost? $2.9 milllion.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rekrul</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055/comment-page-1#comment-788104</link>
		<dc:creator>Rekrul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055#comment-788104</guid>
		<description>As much as I dislike Micro$oft...

Want an ad that will actually work and catch people&#039;s attention? Show the Windows guy surrounded by piles of software boxes including tons of games, with more being continuously delivered as the ad goes on. So much software that he can&#039;t even keep up with it. Meanwhile the Mac guy has one or two little piles. Every time the delivery guy comes on the screen, Mac gets all excited and then depressed as the guy walks right by the Mac to deliver all the software to Windows. Finally at the end of the ad, Mac gets one single piece of new software. Windows looks over and comments &quot;That&#039;s a great one, I had that last year.&quot; :)

(You&#039;ll probably notice that I didn&#039;t call the Windows guy &quot;PC&quot;. That&#039;s because PC stands for &quot;Personal Computer&quot;, which means ANY computer. Despite current usage, &quot;PC&quot; is not a name owned by Micro$soft or any other Intel/Windows based company.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I dislike Micro$oft&#8230;</p>
<p>Want an ad that will actually work and catch people&#8217;s attention? Show the Windows guy surrounded by piles of software boxes including tons of games, with more being continuously delivered as the ad goes on. So much software that he can&#8217;t even keep up with it. Meanwhile the Mac guy has one or two little piles. Every time the delivery guy comes on the screen, Mac gets all excited and then depressed as the guy walks right by the Mac to deliver all the software to Windows. Finally at the end of the ad, Mac gets one single piece of new software. Windows looks over and comments &#8220;That&#8217;s a great one, I had that last year.&#8221; <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(You&#8217;ll probably notice that I didn&#8217;t call the Windows guy &#8220;PC&#8221;. That&#8217;s because PC stands for &#8220;Personal Computer&#8221;, which means ANY computer. Despite current usage, &#8220;PC&#8221; is not a name owned by Micro$soft or any other Intel/Windows based company.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055/comment-page-1#comment-787405</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17055#comment-787405</guid>
		<description>Two years too late! Apple has been showing their ads for about two years, and Microsoft responds now? I would have praised Microsoft&#039;s new ad two years ago, but to counter an ad campaign that&#039;s already two years old just makes Microsoft look slow and behind the times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years too late! Apple has been showing their ads for about two years, and Microsoft responds now? I would have praised Microsoft&#8217;s new ad two years ago, but to counter an ad campaign that&#8217;s already two years old just makes Microsoft look slow and behind the times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
