Comments on: Higher than high definition TV? http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1709 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1709/comment-page-1#comment-2685 Reader's Write Fri, 18 Jun 2004 22:52:05 +0000 #comment-2685 If you are greater than 2 to 4 ft away from the face of TV no major health hazards should occur. How many times have I scolded my kids laying on the floor a couple of feet from the TV face ? Saying its bad for your eyes when in fact the microwave radiation is bad for their health. 1000 to 1200 Watt Microwaves can also cook food. Try an experiment, put your head 6 inches from the CRT/TV for 4 hours and observe the effect. If you are greater than 2 to 4 ft away from the face of TV no major health hazards should occur.

How many times have I scolded my kids laying on the floor a couple of feet from the TV face ? Saying its bad for your eyes when in fact the microwave radiation is bad for their health.

1000 to 1200 Watt Microwaves can also cook food.

Try an experiment, put your head 6 inches from the CRT/TV
for 4 hours and observe the effect.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1709/comment-page-1#comment-2680 Reader's Write Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:56:53 +0000 #comment-2680 I like the idea of higher resolution. However, the comment about "high energy" "microwave electromagnetic radiation" is a contradiction of terms. Microwave energy is low energy. I've never considered my CRT a radiation health risk. I like the idea of higher resolution.

However, the comment about “high energy” “microwave electromagnetic radiation” is a contradiction of terms. Microwave energy is low energy. I’ve never considered my CRT a radiation health risk.

]]>