<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Finland put W3.org on anti-porn list?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17148/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17148</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lordpake</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17148/comment-page-1#comment-806082</link>
		<dc:creator>lordpake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17148#comment-806082</guid>
		<description>You have no idea.

Basically, we have some faceless, anonymous bureaucrat(s) somewhere within the National Bureau of Investigations (KRP) who decides what is blocked and what not. There is no oversight whatsover! No one really knows what they blocking. Shouldn&#039;t the police be under civilian supervision in a free society?

As far as I have understood the current system relies on blocking entire domains, instead of just individual suspect URLs. And as this case demonstrates, apparently they do not investigate much, or then their Information Technology skills are seriously lacking (next question would be why people who don&#039;t know their stuff are given this kind of power?). Nothing else can explain blocking W3C. Even if it was just for short time ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have no idea.</p>
<p>Basically, we have some faceless, anonymous bureaucrat(s) somewhere within the National Bureau of Investigations (KRP) who decides what is blocked and what not. There is no oversight whatsover! No one really knows what they blocking. Shouldn&#8217;t the police be under civilian supervision in a free society?</p>
<p>As far as I have understood the current system relies on blocking entire domains, instead of just individual suspect URLs. And as this case demonstrates, apparently they do not investigate much, or then their Information Technology skills are seriously lacking (next question would be why people who don&#8217;t know their stuff are given this kind of power?). Nothing else can explain blocking W3C. Even if it was just for short time &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silly Ratfaced Git</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17148/comment-page-1#comment-805967</link>
		<dc:creator>Silly Ratfaced Git</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 20:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17148#comment-805967</guid>
		<description>Links at W3.org tend to be be links to documents at the sites, pointers into particular entries in the specifications, and links to other standards bodies and consortia and their documents.  If they can find a link to porn at w3.org I would be amazed.

To me this sounds like a case of terminal cranial/rectal insertion syndrome combined with terminal cluelessness.

SRG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links at W3.org tend to be be links to documents at the sites, pointers into particular entries in the specifications, and links to other standards bodies and consortia and their documents.  If they can find a link to porn at w3.org I would be amazed.</p>
<p>To me this sounds like a case of terminal cranial/rectal insertion syndrome combined with terminal cluelessness.</p>
<p>SRG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


