<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Make Net neutrality an election issue!&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17188</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Silly Ratfaced Git</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17188#comment-815828</link>
		<author>Silly Ratfaced Git</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17188#comment-815828</guid>
		<description>It would be helpful to call a spade a spade.

Throttling is really censorship.  OK, they block packets in order to prevent network congestion and so they call it throttling.  Looking at it from the consumer's point of view, instead of from the network corporation's point of view, blocking packets is censorship.

With DPI you can program any kind of censorship you want.  First they censored P2P.  What will they censor next?  

They will always call it 'network management' even when their intent is really censorship.

It's those damn 'they' again.

HAND.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be helpful to call a spade a spade.</p>
<p>Throttling is really censorship.  OK, they block packets in order to prevent network congestion and so they call it throttling.  Looking at it from the consumer&#8217;s point of view, instead of from the network corporation&#8217;s point of view, blocking packets is censorship.</p>
<p>With DPI you can program any kind of censorship you want.  First they censored P2P.  What will they censor next?  </p>
<p>They will always call it &#8216;network management&#8217; even when their intent is really censorship.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s those damn &#8216;they&#8217; again.</p>
<p>HAND.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
