<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python 2.6 final now online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17213/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17213</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:09:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Silly Ratfaced Git</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17213/comment-page-1#comment-820911</link>
		<dc:creator>Silly Ratfaced Git</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 23:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17213#comment-820911</guid>
		<description>Note to Sam I am.

This is another example of inventor/developers &quot;giving away their work for free&quot;.  You probably think that they are not capitalists.

The details on why they do this are difficult for some people to understand.

They do this because the development is a community/group effort.  The end result is superior to what you would get if you do it any other way.  The developers are not really &#039;giving it away for free&#039;.  They receive &#039;payment in kind&#039; by others who contribute code to the effort.  The people that work on these programs actually care that it works correctly since they use it.  I always care more about the code I contribute to FLOSS projects than the code I am paid to write.  That does not imply that I write garbage for my employer, I just don&#039;t care about it as much.

Free as in Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS) is extensively distributed using p2p technology.  I was rather alarmed when I heard what Bell Canada and Comcast were doing since I knew it would block people from getting the iso&#039;s of the latest Fedora, Ubuntu, etc. distros.  All of this P2P activity is completely legal.  Blocking it is an unlawful outrage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to Sam I am.</p>
<p>This is another example of inventor/developers &#8220;giving away their work for free&#8221;.  You probably think that they are not capitalists.</p>
<p>The details on why they do this are difficult for some people to understand.</p>
<p>They do this because the development is a community/group effort.  The end result is superior to what you would get if you do it any other way.  The developers are not really &#8216;giving it away for free&#8217;.  They receive &#8216;payment in kind&#8217; by others who contribute code to the effort.  The people that work on these programs actually care that it works correctly since they use it.  I always care more about the code I contribute to FLOSS projects than the code I am paid to write.  That does not imply that I write garbage for my employer, I just don&#8217;t care about it as much.</p>
<p>Free as in Libre, and Open Source Software (FLOSS) is extensively distributed using p2p technology.  I was rather alarmed when I heard what Bell Canada and Comcast were doing since I knew it would block people from getting the iso&#8217;s of the latest Fedora, Ubuntu, etc. distros.  All of this P2P activity is completely legal.  Blocking it is an unlawful outrage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
