Comments on: You have a nude picture (sorry, call) waiting

By: Liz Newton

Liz Newton — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:08:26 +0000

I agree in general with the tone of the above postings but as a female (and not necessarily a feminist) the thing that struck me was that none of the cases reported on nude pictures of males circulated by their girlfriends. Is it that females have a greater respect for what is presumably intended as a private communication between two individuals?

And what did the girls do when their partners sent their nude pics out into the blue yonder?

By: Rekrul

Rekrul — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:20:04 +0000

They claim that they need to crack down on child porn to protect the “children”, and here they are, ready to ruin the lives of a bunch of kids who took pictures of THEMSELVES!

This country really is getting to the point where it’s too screwed up to function…

By: Malcolm Boura

Malcolm Boura — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:33:49 +0000

In most of Europe it would be no big deal and the results of that lack of concern may be surprising. When people don’t get uptight over the human body and nudity they are much more likely to talk about it with young people. The results are predictable. In Denmark or the Netherlands young people don’t on average become sexually active until about a year older than in the USA and when they do they are much more likely to use a condom and contraception and less likely to be promiscuous. The results are predictable. About one tenth the number of pregnancies, one tenth the number of abortions and over seventy times fewer cases of gonorrhea. Countries such as the UK which are in between in attitudes have outcomes that are also in between. Prudery is a form a child abuse and these laws encourage that child abuse. Are the police and prosecutors prepared to stand in front of 10 pregnant teenagers and explain to them why it is that if they were in Denmark or The Netherlands nine of them would not be pregnant? Or 10 in the waiting room of an abortion clinic? Or 70 at a STD clinic?

By: ¿uoods

¿uoods — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:02:47 +0000

This would be really funny, if it wasn’t sad.

Had no idea minors could be convicted for having nude photo’s of people their own age. I’m sure we all still remember the Vanessa Hudgens (However her names spelled.) incident.

This sounds like a messed up movie satire. It Made much more sense once I saw Texas mentioned.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:10:52 +0000

In America, this is called democracy.

By: Mostly Harmless

Mostly Harmless — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:54:03 +0000

“Licking Valley High School”? That is hysterical! It sounds like it came right out of a low brow high school comedy farce movie… Combined with the story it is the kind of stuff a person couldn’t even make up. Priceless.

By: Jon

Jon — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:02:21 +0000

The state IS the parent. And the entertainment cartels, of course. Ask George W.

Cheers!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:20:18 +0000

Enought is enought with these extremist-bigots!

These craked pots zealots have better to leave our kid alone our else!

This is the job of the parents to deal with this type of issue, not to some freaken crappy stupid judges or greedy prosecutors who don’t know what they are doing!

They poluted the list of sexual sex ofended with so much crap that it has become useless!

It like the terrorist list! Good job!