Joel Tenenbaum vs the RIAA
p2pnet news view | RIAA News:- Yesterday, “Vivendi Universal, EMI, Warner Music and Sony BMG’s RIAA has so many thorns in its side it’s starting to look like a porcupine,” p2pnet posted, continuing:
“And one of the most painful must be professor Charles Nesson of Harvard Law School. Harvard is the one senior US teaching institution the Big 4 have been unable (afraid?) to touch in their twisted campaign to reduce every American university to the status of marketing-unit-cum-copyright-cop, and every American student to servile consumer of corporate ‘product,’ and only corporate ‘product’.”
Harvard’s CyberOne: Law in the Court of Public Opinion blog posts, “Nesson and a crack team of CyberOne students is in the process of defending Joel Tenenbaum, a digital native, from the RIAA,” Recording Industry vs The People points out.
The item below is excerpted from their defense of their counterclaim against the RIAA and the music companies that back it, giving a pretty good idea of the stakes involved, and what Joel is up against, it says, continuing »»»
We are in the process of building out the docket from the case for public scrutiny. View the motion to add the RIAA as a defendant in our counterclaim here, and the amendment to the counterclaim itself here.
The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is in the process of bringing to bear upon the defendant, Joel Tenenbaum, the full might of its lobbying influence and litigating power. Joel Tenenbaum was a teenager at the time of the alleged copyright infringements, in every way representative of his born-digital generation.
The plaintiffs and the RIAA are seeking to punish him beyond any rational measure of the damage he allegedly caused.
They do this, not for the purpose of recovering compensation for actual damage caused by Joel`s individual action, nor for the primary purpose of deterring him from further copyright infringement, but for the ulterior purpose of creating an urban legend so frightening to children using computers, and so frightening to parents and teachers of students using computers, that they will somehow reverse the tide of the digital future.
The plaintiffs in the suit and the RIAA are abusing law and this court’s civil process. Because Joel Tenenbaum allegedly downloaded seven songs from a file-sharing network comprised of millions of his peers doing likewise, the plaintiffs have already imposed upon him process filling a docket sheet running back over years.
Representing himself pro se with help from his mother he has responded with constitutional defenses and a counterclaim against the plaintiffs and against the RIAA for their abuse of law and this court`s civil process.
Joel challenges the constitutionality of the process and statute being wielded against him. The “Digital Theft Deterrence Act of 1999″ is essentially a criminal statute, punitively deterrent in its every substantive aspect.
Joel seeks damages to compensate for the actual damage RIAA has done to him and his family.
He claims the right to trial by jury including the right to offer proof and argument to the jury about what is right and what is wrong on both sides of this case.
In the face of the onslaught the plaintiffs have imposed and are continuing to impose upon him he seeks justice from both judge and jury.
At core his defenses and counterclaim raise a profoundly conceptual question: Is the law just the grind of a statutory machine to be carried out by judge and jury as cogs in the machine, or do judge and jury claim the right and duty and power of constitution and conscience to do justice.
Stay tuned.
p2pnet – Harvard`s Charles Nesson battles the RIAA, October 28, 2008
Recording Industry vs The People – Announcement from Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Students about SONY v. Tenenbaum, October 28, 2008
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.






October 29th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
Well. It is up to us to creat another urbain legend that may well become reality agaisnt the RIAA with our pest killer. This fools are asking for it and their are going to get it.
October 30th, 2008 at 6:29 pm
Sony BMG: 3rd quarter loss 740m, looking at bankruptcy,
EMI: 3rd quarter loss 700b, thats a b for billion, looking at bankruptcy,
Warner, 3rd quarter loss 300b
Vivendi, who the fsck cares about vivendi…
Logistep is being sued for criminal activity,
MediaSentry is being sued for criminal activity,
and now the Harvard Professor of Law is going to hand them their spleen, i love it…
@ 200usd/song for innocent infringement violation, i am currently at 112,341,400,000usd and counting…
Retarded Idiots Association of Asshats, die.
stw = share the wealth
keep file-sharing and they will all die..
remember, file-sharing is a civil infraction, not murder as they would lead you to think.
December 16th, 2008 at 11:16 am
so its okay to steal music Joel? Shame shame shame on you!!! My daughter has been an independent musician for several years and people just take her music off of the internet. shame on all of you file sharers!!!!!!!!!!