Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

No response from CRTC: Why not?

p2pnet news view Freedom | P2P:- October 31 has come and gone.

“So I filed a complaint with the CRTC,” posts filed on dslreports, going on, “I said this »»»

Hi,

This is in regards to the CAIP vs Bell filing found at »www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2008/···5153.htm, 2008-04-03 – #: 8622-C51-200805153 – Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) – Application requesting certain orders directing Bell Canada to cease and desist from throttling its wholesale ADSL Access Services

The CRTC said they would rule on the matter by October 31, 2008. So far there is no ruling on the CRTC website.

In addition to this, I came across a CBC news report that said the CRTC has delayed its Oct. 31st deadline. I do not see this date ammendment anywhere on the above mentioned CRTC website.

Per this Commission letter: »www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Lette···808c.htm

“It is noted that the Commission expects to issue a final determination by 31 October 2008 , which meets the service standard for a Type 2 Part VII application.”

I would like to know when the CRTC plans on its ruling. What is the new date?

I would also like to see this new date and ammendment specified on the above mentioned website since many people are involved and following this and see zero reference from the Commission on this date ammendment/change.

Should changes not be addressed by the Commission? Or should the people just find out from an obscure CBC article?

This isn’t right.

It isn’t.

But then CRTC chairman Konrad von Finckenstein, a former judge, is clearly finding it extremely difficult to weigh the vested, self-serving interests of giant telecommunications company Bell Canada against the genuine interests of its customers, as well as those of smaller ISPs who rely on it.

“You can file a complaint also,” posts oh yeah, “via: www.crtc.gc.ca/RapidsCCM/Register.asp?lang=E

“I suggest you do it to get the point across to them that what they are pulling here isn’t right.”

Definitely stay tuned.
Add to Technorati Favorites

dslreports – Trick or Treat – CRTC Decision, October 31, 2007
delayed its Oct. 31st deadline
– CRTC delays Bell traffic throttling decision, October 17, 2008


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!

Subscribe
to p2pnet.net
| | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

4 Responses to “No response from CRTC: Why not?”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    well done, and im staying tuned for the crtc’s reply

  2. ComeonComcast Says:

    If it ever comes lol =P

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    thousands of people are following this.

    The CRTC never had so many complaints submitted in support of a party, Nor had they ever had so many complaints.

    Yet the CRTC deems it fit to keep these thousands of people in the dark and uninformed.

    Shows you what the Canadian government is all about.

  4. freeman Says:

    OUCH
    Seems like Canadians have spoken and there’s nowhere for gov. and corp. to run
    I’d say one judge and his buddies are screwed. 50 + court cases compared to Bell’s one. Actually 1000’s of court cases against Bell’s and CTRC’s one … hmmm

    Even better, that’s 1000’s of Notices with full retroactive payback/remedy since throttling started, at full losses per each ;)
    Wow, I ran out of fingers counting millions just in damages

    I’m in :D

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy