Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

‘Monetizing’ music downloads

p2pnet news view | P2P | Music:- 1972 – First removable media, the 8-inch floppy disk is developed by an IBM team led by David Noble. It it opens the way to hand-to-hand file transfer over a “sneakernet,” the first kind of Person-2-Person sharing.

Twenty years later, Don’t copy that floppy is the punch-line to a campaign launched by the Software Publisher Association, aimed at teens.

The two clips sited above are just a few from a long list of others on the Wikipedia’s fascinating Timeline of file sharing which serve to underscore three principal realities in 2008:

  1. File sharing has been elevated by vested interests in the music, movie and software industries from an obscure way for people to share with each other, to a major crime of international proportions;
  2. Taxpayer funded government and  police agencies around the world have becomed corporate proxies, sucking up valuable manpower and other scarce resources which would clearly be far better employed on more important matters than protecting, and enhancing, corporate bottom lines.
  3. The corporations still don’t know which way is up.

When it comes to music, the major record labels, Vivendi Universal (France), Sony BMG (Japan and Germany), EMI (Britain), and Warner Music (US), have in particular completely misread and mismanaged things, turning what should have been an exciting and innovative way to distribute ‘product’ and to interface directly with people who keep them in business, into a massive, world-wide conflict, alienating their customers on all sides and further tarnishing their already seriously tattered images.

And they still haven’t succeeded in ‘monetizing’ downloading.

Maybe they should re-read suggestions from p2pnet reader Julian Bond from four years back.”How much are you really prepared to pay for music?” – he asked, going on »»»

Here’s my answer.

The first thing I want is a product I actually want to buy. That’s a minimum of an mp3 digitised at 192Kb VBR with no DRM. That’s the point where the product is as good as something I rip myself from a CD. … And I can play it anywhere. On my home PC, on my laptop, my portable music player, my mp3 CD player, or in the car. Without jumping through the DRM hoops and with the ability to back it up.

At the top end, for me $0.99 (or whatever the UK equivalent is) per song is too much. I have to think about whether I want to blow $10 on this album instead of that one. At the bottom end, grabbing it for free from a p2p service means too much hassle in locating it, fixing the tags and file names, assembling the album and discarding the badly ripped or corrupted copies.

Some p2p services are better than others but as one wag put it, it’s hard work at below minimum wage.

Now, what I’ve discovered is: if I buy it from AllOfMp3.com [an indie music service killed by the Big 4] at $0.01 per Mb or about $0.06 per song, I don’t even think about the cost. $1 per album is so low that I’ll just do it. The end result is that I’m buying more music and listening to more music, and I’m actually spending more than I used to when buying CDs.

So for me, at least, the price point where I’ll switch from trying to get it for free and actually paying for downloads is somewhere between $0.06 and $0.99, or $1 and $10 per CD.

My guess is that for most people the point where they stop thinking about the price and download huge quantities is around $0.25 per song. I’m a cheapskate, so my personal boundary is probably $0.10. But I suspect the tipping point for most of us is a bit higher.

So, putting this together with the detail from The Long Tail, it seems clear to me that the best strategy for the music industry is to go flat out for scale so that the overheads drop well below $0.25. And then offer up everything they’ve got, even it only gets a couple of downloads a year.

Offer it at three price points:

  • $0.50 for recent big name launches.
  • Drop that to $0.25 for reasonably current releases after 6 months.
  • And then sell everything else at $0.10 per song or $0.02 per Mb

From the labels’ point of view, this should look like Free Money. It’s from inventory that’s already covered it’s costs and wasn’t earning anything anyway.

And then we can all just forget about DRM, suing customers, price cartels and regional price differences.

And at that point maybe the p2p file sharing networks will just fade away because nobody can be bothered any more.

Now, someone go tell the Big 4.

JN

Add to Technorati Favorites



Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe
to p2pnet.net
| | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

4 Responses to “‘Monetizing’ music downloads”

  1. KChan Says:

    I like the discount rack, were music is sold by the pound (Mb), I’m sure the big4 would like to get something for the old back catalog. And it would stop out the sell of old CD and records to all but collector of vinyl. Where could I get my fix of Ann Murray ?

  2. nigerian bank has money for YOU Says:

    nothing
    after what these pieces a crap have done to our planet, with the ruination of lives in pursuit of greed.
    Let them all go broke 1st.

    when arts and entertainment are given freely , don’t that feel better.

    We need a tv-forge.net
    and a
    movie-forge.net
    and a arts-forge.net

    Say no to monetizing the net.
    NET NEUTRALITY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    only way it works is each country elects via the internet REAL PEOPLE who have no ties to the entertainment industry.

    THATS ONLY WAY WE MIGHT TRUST IT.
    other wise go screw another light bulb in, we ain’t buying it and i hope in 5 years when your sales are totally gutted with the screwey economy you really get the hint hollywood.

  3. surfer Says:

    I agree, I pay nothing now because they refuse to adopt a digital distribution model.

    Besides file-sharing is already free, and contains more content than iTunes.

  4. surfer Says:

    smell the blood…

    Online video chips away at TV

    online, digital, distribution

    what do these three things have in common, let me think…..

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®