Comments on: ‘Monetizing’ music downloads

By: surfer

surfer — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:49:18 +0000

smell the blood…

Online video chips away at TV

online, digital, distribution

what do these three things have in common, let me think…..

By: surfer

surfer — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:55:07 +0000

I agree, I pay nothing now because they refuse to adopt a digital distribution model.

Besides file-sharing is already free, and contains more content than iTunes.

By: nigerian bank has money for YOU

nigerian bank has money for YOU — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:25:04 +0000

nothing
after what these pieces a crap have done to our planet, with the ruination of lives in pursuit of greed.
Let them all go broke 1st.

when arts and entertainment are given freely , don’t that feel better.

We need a tv-forge.net
and a
movie-forge.net
and a arts-forge.net

Say no to monetizing the net.
NET NEUTRALITY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
only way it works is each country elects via the internet REAL PEOPLE who have no ties to the entertainment industry.

THATS ONLY WAY WE MIGHT TRUST IT.
other wise go screw another light bulb in, we ain’t buying it and i hope in 5 years when your sales are totally gutted with the screwey economy you really get the hint hollywood.

By: KChan

KChan — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:24:43 +0000

I like the discount rack, were music is sold by the pound (Mb), I’m sure the big4 would like to get something for the old back catalog. And it would stop out the sell of old CD and records to all but collector of vinyl. Where could I get my fix of Ann Murray ?