The Net, Replicator of Information: isoHunt
p2pnet news view Freedom | P2P:- “Our first dealing with copyright takedown was Microsoft,” isoHunt founder Gary Fung told p2pnet yesterday when we asked him when his problems with anti-P2P attacks began.
“After that came a whole range of software companies, movie studios like Paramount, and industry associations like RIAA and CRIA,” he said, with the CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association of America) number one on the list of Korporate Kopyright Klans trying to close isoHunt down.
But he isn’t just sitting there and taking it.
“Canadian BitTorrent and P2P search engine isoHunt has become the first such site to go from defense to attack in the online file-sharing wars,” p2pnet posted in September
In a landmark case, it`s suing Canadian RIAA clone the CRIA, asking a court in British Columbia to make the first ruling on whether or not BitTorrent search engines should be held liable for .torrent files that might link to copyrighted data.
Now, Join the Copyfight! – “Since I’ve been sued by both the MPAA (Hollywood) and the CRIA (Canadian recording industry), I’ve talked about what’s been happening with our cases,” says Fung on isoHunt, going on »»»
Our CRIA case has also recently received mainstream press attention by the Canadian Press and Globe & Mail. But the question is why? Why do they insist on suing their own customers? Why do they sue search engines like us, who make the internet more useful for everyone?
The problem lies in something fundamentally broken with the copyright system. A choice quote from Cory Doctorow’s article on the “copyfight”:
So the natural inclination of anyone who is struck by a piece of creative work is to share it. And since “sharing” on the Internet is the same as “copying,” this puts you square in copyright’s crosshairs. Everyone copies. Dan Glickman, the ex-Congressman who now heads up the Motion Picture Association of America (as pure a copyright maximalist as you could hope to meet) admitted to copying Kirby Dick’s documentary This Film is Not Yet Rated (a scorching critique of the MPAA’s rating system) but excused it because the copy was “in [his] vault.” To pretend that you do not copy is to adopt the twisted hypocrisy of the Victorians who swore that they never, ever masturbated. Everyone knows that they themselves are lying, and a large number of us know that everyone else is lying too.
When the head of the MPAA has to admit to copying the film that criticizes the very industry he represents, an industry group of lobbyists and litigators against such copying, it highlights an important fact beyond the obvious hypocrisy. The internet has completely changed the economics of sharing. When sharing equals copying on the internet and the direct cost of that sharing is effectively $0 (it doesn’t cost you anything to share videos on Youtube or BitTorrent), it makes copyright infringement so easy that even Dan Glickman can do it.
So easy that a mom like Stephanie Lenz can do it when she posted a video of her 13-month-old son dancing to Prince’s music. And I mean no disrespect to them.
This is an age of rampant sharing and remixing, and if you can make the connection between sharing and culture as Doctorow has, you will see this war between rightsholders and consumers will never end and the rightsholders will never win. The band Girl Talk and Lessig and James Boyle and Terry McBride of Nettwerk Remixing and sharing is good for culture, suing consumers and technologists who enable sharing is destructive for everyone.
The internet is a more efficient information machine than the printing press or VCR ever was, and also a whole different animal. It’s time the content industries learn to put it to better use as well, by discarding past notions of how business is done based on an economy of scarcity.
In Star Trek, currency becomes irrelevant with virtually unlimited “copying” of physical objects with the Replicator.
The internet is the Replicator of information. When a 13-month-old dances to Prince’s music, copyright infringement is nowhere near his consciousness. It’s an endorsement that he likes it, pure and simple. and isoHunt all echo a common point:
I’ve said a number of times that I’m not against copyright, but copyright does need significant reform in the internet age. If all this rampant copying on BitTorrent and the internet has not made a dent in Hollywood’s record earnings, why can’t we all just get along without rabid lawsuits? Why can’t they see that sharing and remixing is a human urge for culture, and when we share and remixes art, it’s not a liability but an endorsement for the artist or author or producer?
When the majority of society has no ethical conviction of wrongdoing when they violate copyright law, it’s not society that’s wrong, it’s the law. Because no one can really own ideas.
Newton once said, “If I have seen further it is only by standing on the shoulders of Giants.” It’s how the arts and sciences progresses. We share, we inspire and we remix.
If you want to join the copyfight, simply share your thoughts by replying, share this post with your friends, and join isoHunt’s Facebook group. With our pending lawsuit against the CRIA in our home country, we may need your voice real soon, especially if you are Canadian. For more on Copyfight and where the word came from, go here.
p2pnet – isoHUNT sues record labels` CRIA, September 6, 2008
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It`s really easy!Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.
November 10th, 2008 at 2:35 pm
John,
I’m trying to register, but I haven’t gotten my password yet.
November 10th, 2008 at 2:58 pm
Youâre in the dbase but you don’t seem to have included a password. Iâve added one for you and emailed it to you.
Cheers!
November 10th, 2008 at 10:56 pm
Basically, the internet is the most efficient copying machine ever produced. It’s what it does, it is it’s natural function to copy. If there is to be an internet at all then there necessarily must be copying. Read this: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/kelly08/kelly08_index.html
February 25th, 2009 at 4:56 am
Wow netizen, very well put!
The root of the word copy is from copious. It use to mean something good, like the abundance of nature and the harvest.
It’s too bad we can’t appreciate this richness of copying for what it is and instead want to tax each little transfer as if such measures would create more wealth. Sharing is good.