<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EU Council balks at releasing secret ACTA papers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17551/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17551</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ya leaked on purpose</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17551/comment-page-1#comment-879561</link>
		<dc:creator>ya leaked on purpose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17551#comment-879561</guid>
		<description>bal balh blah?

ya could break up paragraphs and hit that famous enter key?

oh summed up , if it takes 6 years to get the documents then they need ot know we mean literal business.

OUR FORE FATHERS DIDNT FIGHT THE NAZIS to have a bunch a facists ( see musilini quotes about what facism to him was)
to have a bunch a dweeb stiff suits take out rights away.

As the new signs around peterbourgh ontario say &quot;eggs a farmers choice&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bal balh blah?</p>
<p>ya could break up paragraphs and hit that famous enter key?</p>
<p>oh summed up , if it takes 6 years to get the documents then they need ot know we mean literal business.</p>
<p>OUR FORE FATHERS DIDNT FIGHT THE NAZIS to have a bunch a facists ( see musilini quotes about what facism to him was)<br />
to have a bunch a dweeb stiff suits take out rights away.</p>
<p>As the new signs around peterbourgh ontario say &#8220;eggs a farmers choice&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17551/comment-page-1#comment-879091</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/17551#comment-879091</guid>
		<description>Several groups have tried to get the ACTA documents. While it all sounds so plausible about guarding the process from corporations trying to steal the march through patenting, given the past examples of this sort of closed door processes leads one into strong doubt. 

For a while the one about broadcast carriers having their own copyright granted through the act of the broadcast was also very secret. One thing we can be sure of, it is not being hidden out of sight for no reason. They are more concerned that if the knowledge were known that in each country their own populations would be putting pressure on killing support for it or wanting to make needed changes. This is exactly how Bush got many of his own little pets through. Limit the time to respond in vote, limit the time to even read what the proposed vote is for, title it something that wraps it up in a flag or kids name, and push it on the public as a done deal. Having seen that method used so long, is it any wonder that I or anyone else is highly skeptical about the outcome of any such secret planning for any treaty expected to be globalized across the world? 

Don&#039;t even mention in the same sentence nor paragraph, that the copyright industries, their past actions in all countries around the world is deeply involved with this and all of a sudden it takes on a whole new aspect. I would suspect that it will have to be issued in the next few months, prior to the new president taking office here or it is liable to be shot down. This is the last grasp effort for what I hope is a stoppage of the excessive reign they&#039;ve had of having their lobbies heard, bills formulated over them, and rubber stamped through the legal machine. I am hoping we might have a swing in the pendulum towards a more saner copyright rather than the draconian one we have seen supported time after time to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several groups have tried to get the ACTA documents. While it all sounds so plausible about guarding the process from corporations trying to steal the march through patenting, given the past examples of this sort of closed door processes leads one into strong doubt. </p>
<p>For a while the one about broadcast carriers having their own copyright granted through the act of the broadcast was also very secret. One thing we can be sure of, it is not being hidden out of sight for no reason. They are more concerned that if the knowledge were known that in each country their own populations would be putting pressure on killing support for it or wanting to make needed changes. This is exactly how Bush got many of his own little pets through. Limit the time to respond in vote, limit the time to even read what the proposed vote is for, title it something that wraps it up in a flag or kids name, and push it on the public as a done deal. Having seen that method used so long, is it any wonder that I or anyone else is highly skeptical about the outcome of any such secret planning for any treaty expected to be globalized across the world? </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t even mention in the same sentence nor paragraph, that the copyright industries, their past actions in all countries around the world is deeply involved with this and all of a sudden it takes on a whole new aspect. I would suspect that it will have to be issued in the next few months, prior to the new president taking office here or it is liable to be shot down. This is the last grasp effort for what I hope is a stoppage of the excessive reign they&#8217;ve had of having their lobbies heard, bills formulated over them, and rubber stamped through the legal machine. I am hoping we might have a swing in the pendulum towards a more saner copyright rather than the draconian one we have seen supported time after time to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


