Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

Harry Potter Lexicon author appeals Rowling win

p2pnet news view | Freedom:- “I guess I underestimated the resolve of the defendants and defendants’ lawyers, who include the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society,” says Recording Industry vs The People’s Ray Beckerman.

Harry Potter author JK Rowling had apparently won her case against small online publisher Steven Vander Ark (right), said p2pnet in September.

Rowling and her partners, Warner Bros, had sued him in a copyright dispute.

The Stanford Law School’s Fair Use Project represented RDR Books, which’d been planning to publish Vander Ark’s online Harry Potter Lexicon.

“The Harry Potter Lexicon – This is such a great site that I have been known to sneak into an internet café while out writing and check a fact rather than go into a bookshop and buy a copy of Harry Potter (which is embarrassing),” Rowling herself once said of it.

“A website for the dangerously obsessive; my natural home.”

But she took a diametrically opposing view when the news broke that RDR was planning to turn it into a hardback book.

Or did Warner Bros raise the initial objection?

Either way, Rowling sued and won and Beckerman suggested it was unlikely Stanford or Vander Ark would appeal.

But he was wrong.

“Copyright and Fair Use” at Stanford Law School reports that the defendant publisher, RDR Books, has filed an appeal from the Judge’s decision in Warner Bros. Pictures v. RDR Books, the case involving the Harry Patter Lexicon,” he says, adding:

“The Judge, after a bench trial, issued an injunction and statutory damages of $6750 holding that the Lexicon was not protected by fair use due to (a) sloppiness in attribution in sections, (b) the length of some of the quotes, and (c) imitation of J.K. Rowling’s writing style in portions.”

Add to Technorati Favorites

Recording Industry vs The People – Harry Potter Lexicon decision appealed, November 11, 2008
p2pnet
– JK Rowling wins Harry Potter copyright case, September 9, 2008


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe
to p2pnet.net
| | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®