Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
TekSavvy
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

1st Canadian convicted of movie ‘piracy’

p2pnet news view Politics | Movies:- Hollywood copyright enforcer the MPAA has scored a victory in Canada.

“Anytime an individual goes into a movie theatre and captures a motion picture by way of photographic or video recording, it’s now considered unlawful.”

But that wasn’t MPAA mouthpiece Dan Glickman. Rather, it was a Calgary detective, Asif Rashid, said p2pnet in January.

And now Richard Craig Lissaman, the subject of the comment, has become the first person in Canada to be convicted under the Stephen Harper Bill C-59, Hollywood’s Canadian anti-camcording law.

Lissaman, who admitted recording  Sweeney Todd, was sentenced to $1,495 in fines and placed on probation for a year by provincial court Judge Catherine Skene, says the Canwest News Service.

He’s also barred from going to the movies or from purchasing, owning or taking  video recording equipment, including on a cellphone, outside his home during his probation period, says the story, which doesn’t explain how the ’sentences’ will be enforced.

But these penalties weren’t even nearly strong enough, says a Hollywood spokeswoman.

“We would have liked to see jail,” the Calgary Herald has Virginia Jones, of the Canadian Motion Picture Distributors Association, stating.

Lissaman was arrested in December last year and the camcorder was, “concealed in his clothing, the National Post quoted Rashid as saying, going on:

Gregory Hagen, an assistant professor of law at the University of Calgary with expertise in intellectual property and Internet law, said the changes to the Criminal Code were the result of a lobbying efforts by the association and other groups representing studios and filmmakers.

“This was not so much a legal effort but a public relations effort,” he said. “It’s to get people associating camcording in theatres with doing something that is criminal.”

But Mr. Hagen said the law could have unforeseen ramifications. Under the new act, even those who record a film for legitimate purposes — such as for criticism or a review — could be charged. Under the old law, copying snippets of films for these purposes was protected as “fair dealing,” he said.

“Under the Copyright Act, it had to be proven that the image in the camera was for some sale, or rental or distribution,” he said. “Now all you have to do is find the image and prove it was recorded without consent and that person is liable for imprisonment for up to two years.”

With America as the top country for movie piracy, Hollywood says Canada is the place for camcording crooks, backed by such as David Wilkins, Hollywood ambassador to Canada.

“Accordingly,” p2pnet posted, “new Canadian anti-piracy laws were introduced with embarrassingly indecent haste, leaping ahead of other purely Canadian problems which needed to be urgently addressed.”

The story also highlighted the case of Gérémi Adam, 25, a Montreal man who, “became the RCMP’s poster boy for the federal government’s recently adopted copyright legislation during a news conference yesterday,” said the Montreal Gazette.

There has grown up in the minds of certain groups … the notion that because a man or corporation has made a profit out of the public for a number of years, the government and the courts are charged with the duty of guaranteeing such profit in the future, even in the face of changing circumstances and contrary to public interest.

This strange doctrine is not supported by statute or common law. Neither individuals nor corporations have any right to come into court and ask that the clock of history be stopped, or turned back.

- Robert A. Heinlein, Lifeline (1938)

Defence lawyer Steve Jenuth said there was no evidence his client was reproducing copies of films and selling them, says the Calgary Sun.

There is, of course, no such offence as movie ‘piracy’.

Did you enjoy this story, or find it interesting/useful? Help keep the posts coming by donating. No amount is too small. Cheers! And thanks.
Add to Technorati Favorites

p2pnet – 2nd Canadian charged with camcording, January 18, 2008
Canwest News Service
– Calgary man convicted of movie piracy, November 15, 2008
Calgary Herald
– Movie pirate banned from theatres, November 15, 2008
National Post
– Alberta man charged with video piracy, January 17, 2008
p2pnet
– Montreal ‘movie pirate’ faces jail, December 5, 2007
Montreal Gazette
– Alleged movie pirate faces fine or jail, December 5, 2007
Calgary Sun
– Sweeney Todd sinks pirate, November 15, 2008


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details.

HOME

6 Responses to “1st Canadian convicted of movie ‘piracy’”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    10 years for an American.

    Probation for a Canadian.

    10 years for a Chinese person.

  2. Jay Says:

    “He’s also barred from going to the movies”

    Bah hahahahahaha. Now the movie studious will be losing his dollars that he would have given them to see movies.

    Doesnt the hollywood people know you have to do a lot more then cam a movie to get thrown in jail. B&E suspects, car thieves, hit and run drivers, grow op opperators, drug trafficers etc dont even get a year in jail if that.

    I still think it is stupid for anyone to even try to cam a movie. You paid for 9 bucks anyways, sit there and enjoy the movie. Then later download it at home from someone who at least knows how to cam.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    He got off a lot lighter than the 50,000 or so people who got caught by the RIAA using Kazaa or Limewire.

    I know one drive-in movie theater that has a screen visible to the public (and no bright perimeter lights like those x-rated drive-ins of old).

    Would it be a crime for people living on the nearby hill to open their curtains, point a camcorder at the screen, and record the movie from their own living rooms?

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    So now he is sentenced not to pay to go to the movie theater stay home instead watching the movies he downloaded from internet or copied from friends. This is really harsh. . . . for the parasites of the movie industry companies!

    I sentenced myself to the same thing because I am boycotting. Not one of my penny is going to the movie industry since I started to boycott them 2 years ago.

    I saved tons of moneys that I could use to spray pest killer on the RIAA and MPAA parasites.

    Please everyone, sentence yourself to the same thing: Boycott the MPAA and the RIAA members!

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    I had a great carrier and comfy life in movie industry, then was forced into situation where I could tell the truth or lie. I told the truth and was fired, more like destroyed. Haven’t had work since because of it. So now I’ve created my own hobby by providing free movies and software for donations.
    It’s a bit better now, and am making more cash than when I worked by ass off.

    Piss on the rich elite lying bastards!

  6. Reader's Write Says:

    They were hoping for Jail Time? Are you kidding me! Canada barely gives murderers, rapists and child molestors jail time (usually back on the streets in a couple of years). How does jail time for recording a movie in a movie theatre make sense! Canada needs to get tough on real crime!

Leave a Reply

Please no Spam, flaming (attacking others), trolling, and posting off-topic. Thanks.

    Advertisements
MP3Rocket


Remove Spyware with AntiSpyware for Windows®